From unknown Mon Jun 23 18:34:07 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#71462: Default ntp service configuration not working on IPv6 network Resent-From: Guillaume Le Vaillant Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: leo@famulari.name, bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2024 09:26:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: report 71462 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 71462@debbugs.gnu.org Cc: Leo Famulari X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-guix@gnu.org X-Debbugs-Original-Xcc: Leo Famulari Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.171801150523511 (code B ref -1); Mon, 10 Jun 2024 09:26:01 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Jun 2024 09:25:05 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48520 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1sGbGz-000675-2P for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 10 Jun 2024 05:25:05 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:49832) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1sGbGu-00065i-3f for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 10 Jun 2024 05:25:02 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sGaQP-0003F9-Jm for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Jun 2024 04:30:48 -0400 Received: from mout02.posteo.de ([185.67.36.66]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sGaQM-0002nk-Qs for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Jun 2024 04:30:45 -0400 Received: from submission (posteo.de [185.67.36.169]) by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0C364240105 for ; Mon, 10 Jun 2024 10:30:33 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1718008234; bh=NeEKEO1COUgZ6M7NFdAuzqWMeICfGSywZiZ+Weg1Xbw=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type:From; b=NRl56k0Dll1VORJPfdgoKkYjhb9cRDxmeaRYRwIeZPrWqpVJqi3UJ2BgN3EB4FuJf 9d0RF8FS15UYmPAvSMXdsPQfmQUgQbjEK/YOOKTED6KLrumNZPSJ8aK0X17PTY8jf9 0eEA6PPCWYTRdMDs0wEu2cM26eWSshFPqDe+Ik8DNUfcJFQD7xTVJUArtKoX6xwiTg /s4t+fQA/GdnI8FkBtcO0TiWeMP02qheiAdttnjkg/DzSAVqm6qKI002LzveJ4yaaY eHLAORp+jJYDMD5f9DLqm4P+UF845A/ytFwzvl94YGfoXh58CU7RKnMgTdaqFLP1he i2dCERd/fs5vg== Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4VyQ3s2S0Vz6trs for ; Mon, 10 Jun 2024 10:30:33 +0200 (CEST) From: Guillaume Le Vaillant Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2024 08:30:32 +0000 Message-ID: <87ikyhfbdj.fsf@kitej> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.67.36.66; envelope-from=glv@posteo.net; helo=mout02.posteo.de X-Spam_score_int: -43 X-Spam_score: -4.4 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: -1.3 (-) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain On an IPv6-only network, the default configuration for ntp-service-type doesn't work, because the default pool used (<0.guix.pool.ntp.org>) doesn't have IPv6 addresses. In fact, the <1.guix.pool.ntp.org> and <3.guix.pool.ntp.org> pools don't have IPv6 addresses either. Only the <2.guix.pool.ntp.org> pool works with IPv6. Would it be possible to add IPv6 support to pools 0, 1 and 3? --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iIUEAREKAC0WIQTLxZxm7Ce5cXlAaz5r6CCK3yH+PwUCZma5qA8cZ2x2QHBvc3Rl by5uZXQACgkQa+ggit8h/j+DoAD/YjUvwa5uM72l0rl5ND+w8HypLsMCgHynoOUV w/jBzyEA/1dEHUjt1l1wIOTz0Gs4SBYxZZroK67DZSaKQCC4T4CK =3NIH -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- From unknown Mon Jun 23 18:34:07 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#71462: Default ntp service configuration not working on IPv6 network Resent-From: Leo Famulari Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2024 23:19:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 71462 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Guillaume Le Vaillant Cc: 71462@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 71462-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B71462.171866631410050 (code B ref 71462); Mon, 17 Jun 2024 23:19:01 +0000 Received: (at 71462) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Jun 2024 23:18:34 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38484 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1sJLcP-0002c1-Qf for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 17 Jun 2024 19:18:34 -0400 Received: from fout8-smtp.messagingengine.com ([103.168.172.151]:52459) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1sJLcL-0002bj-M8 for 71462@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 17 Jun 2024 19:18:32 -0400 Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.46]) by mailfout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id F21921380810; Mon, 17 Jun 2024 19:18:21 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 17 Jun 2024 19:18:21 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=famulari.name; h=cc:cc:content-type:content-type:date:date:from:from :in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :reply-to:subject:subject:to:to; s=mesmtp; t=1718666301; x= 1718752701; bh=M1UBauJ0H5Mo5spXLXPKgx2BQJhJ6+gbAkm+7w9c718=; b=R /LXUi1VOYbpEAnJX0op3l5i1+Ig/BFYjo8gVfiBEyxqipUJvc6GTpVx/LxfB2kCD qGbdzgpbu8sDjeFBvFsjIJJJInaYuwbt1efzy1yUa8RaPz0gSiOxTb5xrC/mKIA7 CtCKa5bmW9WOriDvM/dhZTM/cmnq8zebfb7hV/jzp4= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-type:content-type:date:date :feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject:subject:to :to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s= fm1; t=1718666301; x=1718752701; bh=M1UBauJ0H5Mo5spXLXPKgx2BQJhJ 6+gbAkm+7w9c718=; b=hVL+FvZXXLAk3Zsu3D5AbbUVvp730VENA9KQwELRO3bV I/zV8FvxwdzNBaqjETXsEEgk4UmHWObxiJjH//a4im/U++OFUTKZ0KfkMpSOa3TB VZ7aMdL0xNWBErB9qUARY+GZY+KmJoyK8chaH1vhSv0MyTjiPKShlSBKvqJucNqb NW0VXjQvLwqnOwdRen0lYkUKeVSoD1lGqZ2sJkmuus/xnPyUvkhb+GZ01ihDV6Su 4h9XFLXzmSkYpZuVIbsavkSKDNvSARwU84jXk4LD3TCjxCFOfhYy/c57LPlmflhr 1YkTQSvp89AubP+xcAP0uViNLfpAjoU317ErDRbVYA== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvledrfedviedgvddtucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpeffhffvvefukfhfgggtuggjsehttd ertddttddvnecuhfhrohhmpefnvghoucfhrghmuhhlrghrihcuoehlvghosehfrghmuhhl rghrihdrnhgrmhgvqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpefffeefgefhteeukeekleeugedvhe fggffgteeggfdvudefhfekffetvddtjeeiieenucffohhmrghinhepnhhtphdrohhrghdp nhhtphhpohholhdrohhrghenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmh grihhlfhhrohhmpehlvghosehfrghmuhhlrghrihdrnhgrmhgv X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: i819c4023:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Mon, 17 Jun 2024 19:18:21 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2024 19:18:20 -0400 From: Leo Famulari Message-ID: References: <87ikyhfbdj.fsf@kitej> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87ikyhfbdj.fsf@kitej> X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) On Mon, Jun 10, 2024 at 08:30:32AM +0000, Guillaume Le Vaillant wrote: > On an IPv6-only network, the default configuration for ntp-service-type > doesn't work, because the default pool used (<0.guix.pool.ntp.org>) > doesn't have IPv6 addresses. > > In fact, the <1.guix.pool.ntp.org> and <3.guix.pool.ntp.org> pools don't > have IPv6 addresses either. Only the <2.guix.pool.ntp.org> pool works > with IPv6. > > Would it be possible to add IPv6 support to pools 0, 1 and 3? It's not something that we, as Guix, can do. The NTP pool is run by a separate organization, and the question of which DNS names should return AAAA (IPv6) records is open: https://community.ntppool.org/t/the-time-has-come-we-must-enable-ipv6-entirely/1968 However, the reason they give us 4 different addresses is so that we can spread the load around. Our NTP services should choose randomly at run-time. Or we could just make number 2 the default, and then we'll have IPv6 support. Or something more complicated... From unknown Mon Jun 23 18:34:07 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#71462: Default ntp service configuration not working on IPv6 network Resent-From: Guillaume Le Vaillant Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2024 08:23:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 71462 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Leo Famulari Cc: 71462@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 71462-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B71462.17186989322352 (code B ref 71462); Tue, 18 Jun 2024 08:23:02 +0000 Received: (at 71462) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Jun 2024 08:22:12 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41551 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1sJU6W-0000br-Et for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 18 Jun 2024 04:22:12 -0400 Received: from mout02.posteo.de ([185.67.36.66]:32843) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1sJU6T-0000bW-77 for 71462@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 18 Jun 2024 04:22:11 -0400 Received: from submission (posteo.de [185.67.36.169]) by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AF4B6240103 for <71462@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 18 Jun 2024 10:21:54 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1718698914; bh=rzASaVTkXY4mbZuEghrH2SWEomwFlZ2WC318AWI7Fq8=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type: From; b=YwXAkMFrossFNj7FXY7aiBe5Otx/Sv/SVvWKg+JRCpQPbwXLMhSWzrvkrcqXvZohM HXYi9xYUDPD4WIzXr5os72EyyMc5QZ7nEttIghryn3MOjP/uzshBSJQRW5lTCJ9VNU BjzUmMAc/WFbswsYf1ex1ALeSea7HUg9WjzrbwIPxjJRXloJeRCnWrw1xXi/SxRA+Y LpnpkVERPz9Xfnd1q84SHyfDE+CV6BzJ3h0qDhSdmEo5jvbBBw/QlHV9ItS9QULSaf BWgGC/hMAzqET/XCtCjCTZDYhn0kqMHKcSxVfO5V2PNhRfZRTEKE2egX5k+navPNZ1 Pe3di/ubmmpfw== Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4W3KV92f9wz9rxF; Tue, 18 Jun 2024 10:21:53 +0200 (CEST) From: Guillaume Le Vaillant In-Reply-To: (Leo Famulari's message of "Mon, 17 Jun 2024 19:18:20 -0400") References: <87ikyhfbdj.fsf@kitej> Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2024 08:21:51 +0000 Message-ID: <8734pay82o.fsf@kitej> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Leo Famulari skribis: > On Mon, Jun 10, 2024 at 08:30:32AM +0000, Guillaume Le Vaillant wrote: >> On an IPv6-only network, the default configuration for ntp-service-type >> doesn't work, because the default pool used (<0.guix.pool.ntp.org>) >> doesn't have IPv6 addresses. >>=20 >> In fact, the <1.guix.pool.ntp.org> and <3.guix.pool.ntp.org> pools don't >> have IPv6 addresses either. Only the <2.guix.pool.ntp.org> pool works >> with IPv6. >>=20 >> Would it be possible to add IPv6 support to pools 0, 1 and 3? > > It's not something that we, as Guix, can do. > > The NTP pool is run by a separate organization, and the question of > which DNS names should return AAAA (IPv6) records is open: > > https://community.ntppool.org/t/the-time-has-come-we-must-enable-ipv6-ent= irely/1968 > > However, the reason they give us 4 different addresses is so that we can > spread the load around. Our NTP services should choose randomly at > run-time. Or we could just make number 2 the default, and then we'll > have IPv6 support. Or something more complicated... Thanks for the info. I'm now using pool 2 as the default on my IPv6-only machines, and it works well. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iIUEAREKAC0WIQTLxZxm7Ce5cXlAaz5r6CCK3yH+PwUCZnFDnw8cZ2x2QHBvc3Rl by5uZXQACgkQa+ggit8h/j9ddwEAlXCc8TwfewLf0/FJZV0AdUsOpNjjLodIH9YW hhdGasUBAISQgliFHEzScAl5J/74xMAc4km/h15Pr5nRrxFLLyWn =cqVE -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- From unknown Mon Jun 23 18:34:07 2025 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.505 (Entity 5.505) X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org From: help-debbugs@gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System) To: Guillaume Le Vaillant Subject: bug#71462: closed (Re: bug#71462: Default ntp service configuration not working on IPv6 network) Message-ID: References: <87y12kcl29.fsf@gmail.com> <87ikyhfbdj.fsf@kitej> X-Gnu-PR-Message: they-closed 71462 X-Gnu-PR-Package: guix Reply-To: 71462@debbugs.gnu.org Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2024 12:54:02 +0000 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1729342442-25190-1" This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1729342442-25190-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Your bug report #71462: Default ntp service configuration not working on IPv6 network which was filed against the guix package, has been closed. The explanation is attached below, along with your original report. If you require more details, please reply to 71462@debbugs.gnu.org. --=20 71462: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D71462 GNU Bug Tracking System Contact help-debbugs@gnu.org with problems ------------=_1729342442-25190-1 Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received: (at 71462-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Oct 2024 12:53:20 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41810 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1t28xM-0006X4-4W for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 19 Oct 2024 08:53:20 -0400 Received: from mail-pj1-f42.google.com ([209.85.216.42]:61583) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1t28xH-0006Wn-VF for 71462-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 19 Oct 2024 08:53:19 -0400 Received: by mail-pj1-f42.google.com with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-2e2eba31d3aso2108367a91.2 for <71462-done@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 19 Oct 2024 05:52:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1729342306; x=1729947106; darn=debbugs.gnu.org; h=mime-version:user-agent:message-id:date:references:in-reply-to :subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=2ykbPLKvNCOES4tRvxC4MNTF8Ji3vHTC1z5AxmpGw3Q=; b=grunm9r9je8e3OuxInrVNsTiQUkPfSToG33C6qFVqc1CjW6YijcdMnzZJ5VCMNfXAt NA0o/4xcayj58vPtMkRmPHtNWRofTluQ6z3gbxW9yvOUbenm+XpFMJ1uZs+zXmrTTVms tb295pli8LXyYuhtSNcV16oKzwElwhB7SvUnnFXJq0U8H6L74tAHd8v5FqGSwH0Wol6/ EyXRFGkLpPpyF2fJhRtSw8E2yR0dlA2YCVY+a93t89HTQD1ffSnbntp0ZAjmrlBauGlo 6i5jBUrjTV+aJ6I2M/U2SFXx1665zFOXoRfTgYcPDm1EwdXq+4fv7n6IUaf1dYEovOjS aWPA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1729342306; x=1729947106; h=mime-version:user-agent:message-id:date:references:in-reply-to :subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=2ykbPLKvNCOES4tRvxC4MNTF8Ji3vHTC1z5AxmpGw3Q=; b=PRbfcIrP1jKwztfmtsd4qwJj3vTFtbc8rhGIvqzs8/dQkMTNwzxaCdeOHpPeMa2S8V IrkEL9I6KRTTfXr3qeXUv5bwqCZqX3KjQuX2wbyfYeXPThv7cOiGpfOkJVc4AhsEIql9 /QJ6s38AolYRRI0skjB/Nm6yQF9Ik592Rm73DlzUdVguHv+dz5Lxzxkzp1FljdyQ14nO v1wbnup+bQVzRBrJkuSnn6XsxN+TN0a2TncfmKzS93jtMbKMOV2dCSwfcx/bUH/GkDFy /yDH1PsR3T0JuGab/l2GkGIMWCnW26kA6X7sZVLm1LtYxithUnkdNpgdcpe1xbbQtXvP Fvlg== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCUEfaskD/Ux7iJS1K7bBHA+U0a9Vx2/1pHjKuBg3qPyrI76PSRksflkqY+E/qAL7hRm1sB9JR75JPVt@debbugs.gnu.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxfSlqggrF0oeEx6U8w6yJFLiGXdCLF696LFclsrQVhk7bLBl17 +ldJCMBuQN0Byi6tnDanKZKcGBkpFggHdw8S62ldYnQMcmDKS6nljqh00g== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEgFxqixde0oKD17c0Cg988meDpcK2ezV183WErlgc2OCpClGaQRO1EEVlzJafdv+55kOWoHg== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:17ce:b0:2e2:d3a0:4716 with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-2e56165ea0bmr6708854a91.18.1729342305647; Sat, 19 Oct 2024 05:51:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from terra ([2405:6586:be0:0:c8ff:1707:9b9:af89]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 98e67ed59e1d1-2e5611d601esm4035494a91.21.2024.10.19.05.51.44 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sat, 19 Oct 2024 05:51:45 -0700 (PDT) From: Maxim Cournoyer To: Guillaume Le Vaillant Subject: Re: bug#71462: Default ntp service configuration not working on IPv6 network In-Reply-To: <8734pay82o.fsf@kitej> (Guillaume Le Vaillant's message of "Tue, 18 Jun 2024 08:21:51 +0000") References: <87ikyhfbdj.fsf@kitej> <8734pay82o.fsf@kitej> Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2024 21:51:42 +0900 Message-ID: <87y12kcl29.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 71462-done Cc: 71462-done@debbugs.gnu.org, Leo Famulari X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Hi Guillaume, Guillaume Le Vaillant writes: > Leo Famulari skribis: > >> On Mon, Jun 10, 2024 at 08:30:32AM +0000, Guillaume Le Vaillant wrote: >>> On an IPv6-only network, the default configuration for ntp-service-type >>> doesn't work, because the default pool used (<0.guix.pool.ntp.org>) >>> doesn't have IPv6 addresses. >>> >>> In fact, the <1.guix.pool.ntp.org> and <3.guix.pool.ntp.org> pools don't >>> have IPv6 addresses either. Only the <2.guix.pool.ntp.org> pool works >>> with IPv6. >>> >>> Would it be possible to add IPv6 support to pools 0, 1 and 3? >> >> It's not something that we, as Guix, can do. >> >> The NTP pool is run by a separate organization, and the question of >> which DNS names should return AAAA (IPv6) records is open: >> >> https://community.ntppool.org/t/the-time-has-come-we-must-enable-ipv6-entirely/1968 >> >> However, the reason they give us 4 different addresses is so that we can >> spread the load around. Our NTP services should choose randomly at >> run-time. Or we could just make number 2 the default, and then we'll >> have IPv6 support. Or something more complicated... > > Thanks for the info. I'm now using pool 2 as the default on my IPv6-only > machines, and it works well. I've now made pool 2 our default configuration address, in commit 503919fcf0 ("services: ntp: Default to an address that supports IPv6."). Closing. -- Thanks, Maxim ------------=_1729342442-25190-1 Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Jun 2024 09:25:05 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48520 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1sGbGz-000675-2P for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 10 Jun 2024 05:25:05 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:49832) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1sGbGu-00065i-3f for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 10 Jun 2024 05:25:02 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sGaQP-0003F9-Jm for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Jun 2024 04:30:48 -0400 Received: from mout02.posteo.de ([185.67.36.66]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sGaQM-0002nk-Qs for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Jun 2024 04:30:45 -0400 Received: from submission (posteo.de [185.67.36.169]) by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0C364240105 for ; Mon, 10 Jun 2024 10:30:33 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1718008234; bh=NeEKEO1COUgZ6M7NFdAuzqWMeICfGSywZiZ+Weg1Xbw=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type:From; b=NRl56k0Dll1VORJPfdgoKkYjhb9cRDxmeaRYRwIeZPrWqpVJqi3UJ2BgN3EB4FuJf 9d0RF8FS15UYmPAvSMXdsPQfmQUgQbjEK/YOOKTED6KLrumNZPSJ8aK0X17PTY8jf9 0eEA6PPCWYTRdMDs0wEu2cM26eWSshFPqDe+Ik8DNUfcJFQD7xTVJUArtKoX6xwiTg /s4t+fQA/GdnI8FkBtcO0TiWeMP02qheiAdttnjkg/DzSAVqm6qKI002LzveJ4yaaY eHLAORp+jJYDMD5f9DLqm4P+UF845A/ytFwzvl94YGfoXh58CU7RKnMgTdaqFLP1he i2dCERd/fs5vg== Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4VyQ3s2S0Vz6trs for ; Mon, 10 Jun 2024 10:30:33 +0200 (CEST) From: Guillaume Le Vaillant To: bug-guix@gnu.org Subject: Default ntp service configuration not working on IPv6 network X-Debbugs-CC: Leo Famulari Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2024 08:30:32 +0000 Message-ID: <87ikyhfbdj.fsf@kitej> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.67.36.66; envelope-from=glv@posteo.net; helo=mout02.posteo.de X-Spam_score_int: -43 X-Spam_score: -4.4 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: -1.3 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain On an IPv6-only network, the default configuration for ntp-service-type doesn't work, because the default pool used (<0.guix.pool.ntp.org>) doesn't have IPv6 addresses. In fact, the <1.guix.pool.ntp.org> and <3.guix.pool.ntp.org> pools don't have IPv6 addresses either. Only the <2.guix.pool.ntp.org> pool works with IPv6. Would it be possible to add IPv6 support to pools 0, 1 and 3? --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iIUEAREKAC0WIQTLxZxm7Ce5cXlAaz5r6CCK3yH+PwUCZma5qA8cZ2x2QHBvc3Rl by5uZXQACgkQa+ggit8h/j+DoAD/YjUvwa5uM72l0rl5ND+w8HypLsMCgHynoOUV w/jBzyEA/1dEHUjt1l1wIOTz0Gs4SBYxZZroK67DZSaKQCC4T4CK =3NIH -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- ------------=_1729342442-25190-1--