From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Jun 10 05:25:05 2024 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Jun 2024 09:25:05 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48520 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1sGbGz-000675-2P for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 10 Jun 2024 05:25:05 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:49832) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1sGbGu-00065i-3f for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 10 Jun 2024 05:25:02 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sGaQP-0003F9-Jm for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Jun 2024 04:30:48 -0400 Received: from mout02.posteo.de ([185.67.36.66]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sGaQM-0002nk-Qs for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Jun 2024 04:30:45 -0400 Received: from submission (posteo.de [185.67.36.169]) by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0C364240105 for ; Mon, 10 Jun 2024 10:30:33 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1718008234; bh=NeEKEO1COUgZ6M7NFdAuzqWMeICfGSywZiZ+Weg1Xbw=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type:From; b=NRl56k0Dll1VORJPfdgoKkYjhb9cRDxmeaRYRwIeZPrWqpVJqi3UJ2BgN3EB4FuJf 9d0RF8FS15UYmPAvSMXdsPQfmQUgQbjEK/YOOKTED6KLrumNZPSJ8aK0X17PTY8jf9 0eEA6PPCWYTRdMDs0wEu2cM26eWSshFPqDe+Ik8DNUfcJFQD7xTVJUArtKoX6xwiTg /s4t+fQA/GdnI8FkBtcO0TiWeMP02qheiAdttnjkg/DzSAVqm6qKI002LzveJ4yaaY eHLAORp+jJYDMD5f9DLqm4P+UF845A/ytFwzvl94YGfoXh58CU7RKnMgTdaqFLP1he i2dCERd/fs5vg== Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4VyQ3s2S0Vz6trs for ; Mon, 10 Jun 2024 10:30:33 +0200 (CEST) From: Guillaume Le Vaillant To: bug-guix@gnu.org Subject: Default ntp service configuration not working on IPv6 network X-Debbugs-CC: Leo Famulari Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2024 08:30:32 +0000 Message-ID: <87ikyhfbdj.fsf@kitej> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.67.36.66; envelope-from=glv@posteo.net; helo=mout02.posteo.de X-Spam_score_int: -43 X-Spam_score: -4.4 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: -1.3 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain On an IPv6-only network, the default configuration for ntp-service-type doesn't work, because the default pool used (<0.guix.pool.ntp.org>) doesn't have IPv6 addresses. In fact, the <1.guix.pool.ntp.org> and <3.guix.pool.ntp.org> pools don't have IPv6 addresses either. Only the <2.guix.pool.ntp.org> pool works with IPv6. Would it be possible to add IPv6 support to pools 0, 1 and 3? --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iIUEAREKAC0WIQTLxZxm7Ce5cXlAaz5r6CCK3yH+PwUCZma5qA8cZ2x2QHBvc3Rl by5uZXQACgkQa+ggit8h/j+DoAD/YjUvwa5uM72l0rl5ND+w8HypLsMCgHynoOUV w/jBzyEA/1dEHUjt1l1wIOTz0Gs4SBYxZZroK67DZSaKQCC4T4CK =3NIH -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Jun 17 19:18:34 2024 Received: (at 71462) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Jun 2024 23:18:34 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38484 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1sJLcP-0002c1-Qf for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 17 Jun 2024 19:18:34 -0400 Received: from fout8-smtp.messagingengine.com ([103.168.172.151]:52459) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1sJLcL-0002bj-M8 for 71462@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 17 Jun 2024 19:18:32 -0400 Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.46]) by mailfout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id F21921380810; Mon, 17 Jun 2024 19:18:21 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 17 Jun 2024 19:18:21 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=famulari.name; h=cc:cc:content-type:content-type:date:date:from:from :in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :reply-to:subject:subject:to:to; s=mesmtp; t=1718666301; x= 1718752701; bh=M1UBauJ0H5Mo5spXLXPKgx2BQJhJ6+gbAkm+7w9c718=; b=R /LXUi1VOYbpEAnJX0op3l5i1+Ig/BFYjo8gVfiBEyxqipUJvc6GTpVx/LxfB2kCD qGbdzgpbu8sDjeFBvFsjIJJJInaYuwbt1efzy1yUa8RaPz0gSiOxTb5xrC/mKIA7 CtCKa5bmW9WOriDvM/dhZTM/cmnq8zebfb7hV/jzp4= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-type:content-type:date:date :feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject:subject:to :to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s= fm1; t=1718666301; x=1718752701; bh=M1UBauJ0H5Mo5spXLXPKgx2BQJhJ 6+gbAkm+7w9c718=; b=hVL+FvZXXLAk3Zsu3D5AbbUVvp730VENA9KQwELRO3bV I/zV8FvxwdzNBaqjETXsEEgk4UmHWObxiJjH//a4im/U++OFUTKZ0KfkMpSOa3TB VZ7aMdL0xNWBErB9qUARY+GZY+KmJoyK8chaH1vhSv0MyTjiPKShlSBKvqJucNqb NW0VXjQvLwqnOwdRen0lYkUKeVSoD1lGqZ2sJkmuus/xnPyUvkhb+GZ01ihDV6Su 4h9XFLXzmSkYpZuVIbsavkSKDNvSARwU84jXk4LD3TCjxCFOfhYy/c57LPlmflhr 1YkTQSvp89AubP+xcAP0uViNLfpAjoU317ErDRbVYA== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvledrfedviedgvddtucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpeffhffvvefukfhfgggtuggjsehttd ertddttddvnecuhfhrohhmpefnvghoucfhrghmuhhlrghrihcuoehlvghosehfrghmuhhl rghrihdrnhgrmhgvqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpefffeefgefhteeukeekleeugedvhe fggffgteeggfdvudefhfekffetvddtjeeiieenucffohhmrghinhepnhhtphdrohhrghdp nhhtphhpohholhdrohhrghenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmh grihhlfhhrohhmpehlvghosehfrghmuhhlrghrihdrnhgrmhgv X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: i819c4023:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Mon, 17 Jun 2024 19:18:21 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2024 19:18:20 -0400 From: Leo Famulari To: Guillaume Le Vaillant Subject: Re: bug#71462: Default ntp service configuration not working on IPv6 network Message-ID: References: <87ikyhfbdj.fsf@kitej> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87ikyhfbdj.fsf@kitej> X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 71462 Cc: 71462@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) On Mon, Jun 10, 2024 at 08:30:32AM +0000, Guillaume Le Vaillant wrote: > On an IPv6-only network, the default configuration for ntp-service-type > doesn't work, because the default pool used (<0.guix.pool.ntp.org>) > doesn't have IPv6 addresses. > > In fact, the <1.guix.pool.ntp.org> and <3.guix.pool.ntp.org> pools don't > have IPv6 addresses either. Only the <2.guix.pool.ntp.org> pool works > with IPv6. > > Would it be possible to add IPv6 support to pools 0, 1 and 3? It's not something that we, as Guix, can do. The NTP pool is run by a separate organization, and the question of which DNS names should return AAAA (IPv6) records is open: https://community.ntppool.org/t/the-time-has-come-we-must-enable-ipv6-entirely/1968 However, the reason they give us 4 different addresses is so that we can spread the load around. Our NTP services should choose randomly at run-time. Or we could just make number 2 the default, and then we'll have IPv6 support. Or something more complicated... From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Jun 18 04:22:12 2024 Received: (at 71462) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Jun 2024 08:22:12 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41551 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1sJU6W-0000br-Et for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 18 Jun 2024 04:22:12 -0400 Received: from mout02.posteo.de ([185.67.36.66]:32843) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1sJU6T-0000bW-77 for 71462@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 18 Jun 2024 04:22:11 -0400 Received: from submission (posteo.de [185.67.36.169]) by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AF4B6240103 for <71462@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 18 Jun 2024 10:21:54 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1718698914; bh=rzASaVTkXY4mbZuEghrH2SWEomwFlZ2WC318AWI7Fq8=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type: From; b=YwXAkMFrossFNj7FXY7aiBe5Otx/Sv/SVvWKg+JRCpQPbwXLMhSWzrvkrcqXvZohM HXYi9xYUDPD4WIzXr5os72EyyMc5QZ7nEttIghryn3MOjP/uzshBSJQRW5lTCJ9VNU BjzUmMAc/WFbswsYf1ex1ALeSea7HUg9WjzrbwIPxjJRXloJeRCnWrw1xXi/SxRA+Y LpnpkVERPz9Xfnd1q84SHyfDE+CV6BzJ3h0qDhSdmEo5jvbBBw/QlHV9ItS9QULSaf BWgGC/hMAzqET/XCtCjCTZDYhn0kqMHKcSxVfO5V2PNhRfZRTEKE2egX5k+navPNZ1 Pe3di/ubmmpfw== Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4W3KV92f9wz9rxF; Tue, 18 Jun 2024 10:21:53 +0200 (CEST) From: Guillaume Le Vaillant To: Leo Famulari Subject: Re: bug#71462: Default ntp service configuration not working on IPv6 network In-Reply-To: (Leo Famulari's message of "Mon, 17 Jun 2024 19:18:20 -0400") References: <87ikyhfbdj.fsf@kitej> Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2024 08:21:51 +0000 Message-ID: <8734pay82o.fsf@kitej> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 71462 Cc: 71462@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Leo Famulari skribis: > On Mon, Jun 10, 2024 at 08:30:32AM +0000, Guillaume Le Vaillant wrote: >> On an IPv6-only network, the default configuration for ntp-service-type >> doesn't work, because the default pool used (<0.guix.pool.ntp.org>) >> doesn't have IPv6 addresses. >>=20 >> In fact, the <1.guix.pool.ntp.org> and <3.guix.pool.ntp.org> pools don't >> have IPv6 addresses either. Only the <2.guix.pool.ntp.org> pool works >> with IPv6. >>=20 >> Would it be possible to add IPv6 support to pools 0, 1 and 3? > > It's not something that we, as Guix, can do. > > The NTP pool is run by a separate organization, and the question of > which DNS names should return AAAA (IPv6) records is open: > > https://community.ntppool.org/t/the-time-has-come-we-must-enable-ipv6-ent= irely/1968 > > However, the reason they give us 4 different addresses is so that we can > spread the load around. Our NTP services should choose randomly at > run-time. Or we could just make number 2 the default, and then we'll > have IPv6 support. Or something more complicated... Thanks for the info. I'm now using pool 2 as the default on my IPv6-only machines, and it works well. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iIUEAREKAC0WIQTLxZxm7Ce5cXlAaz5r6CCK3yH+PwUCZnFDnw8cZ2x2QHBvc3Rl by5uZXQACgkQa+ggit8h/j9ddwEAlXCc8TwfewLf0/FJZV0AdUsOpNjjLodIH9YW hhdGasUBAISQgliFHEzScAl5J/74xMAc4km/h15Pr5nRrxFLLyWn =cqVE -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Oct 19 08:53:20 2024 Received: (at 71462-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Oct 2024 12:53:20 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41810 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1t28xM-0006X4-4W for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 19 Oct 2024 08:53:20 -0400 Received: from mail-pj1-f42.google.com ([209.85.216.42]:61583) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1t28xH-0006Wn-VF for 71462-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 19 Oct 2024 08:53:19 -0400 Received: by mail-pj1-f42.google.com with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-2e2eba31d3aso2108367a91.2 for <71462-done@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 19 Oct 2024 05:52:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1729342306; x=1729947106; darn=debbugs.gnu.org; h=mime-version:user-agent:message-id:date:references:in-reply-to :subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=2ykbPLKvNCOES4tRvxC4MNTF8Ji3vHTC1z5AxmpGw3Q=; b=grunm9r9je8e3OuxInrVNsTiQUkPfSToG33C6qFVqc1CjW6YijcdMnzZJ5VCMNfXAt NA0o/4xcayj58vPtMkRmPHtNWRofTluQ6z3gbxW9yvOUbenm+XpFMJ1uZs+zXmrTTVms tb295pli8LXyYuhtSNcV16oKzwElwhB7SvUnnFXJq0U8H6L74tAHd8v5FqGSwH0Wol6/ EyXRFGkLpPpyF2fJhRtSw8E2yR0dlA2YCVY+a93t89HTQD1ffSnbntp0ZAjmrlBauGlo 6i5jBUrjTV+aJ6I2M/U2SFXx1665zFOXoRfTgYcPDm1EwdXq+4fv7n6IUaf1dYEovOjS aWPA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1729342306; x=1729947106; h=mime-version:user-agent:message-id:date:references:in-reply-to :subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=2ykbPLKvNCOES4tRvxC4MNTF8Ji3vHTC1z5AxmpGw3Q=; b=PRbfcIrP1jKwztfmtsd4qwJj3vTFtbc8rhGIvqzs8/dQkMTNwzxaCdeOHpPeMa2S8V IrkEL9I6KRTTfXr3qeXUv5bwqCZqX3KjQuX2wbyfYeXPThv7cOiGpfOkJVc4AhsEIql9 /QJ6s38AolYRRI0skjB/Nm6yQF9Ik592Rm73DlzUdVguHv+dz5Lxzxkzp1FljdyQ14nO v1wbnup+bQVzRBrJkuSnn6XsxN+TN0a2TncfmKzS93jtMbKMOV2dCSwfcx/bUH/GkDFy /yDH1PsR3T0JuGab/l2GkGIMWCnW26kA6X7sZVLm1LtYxithUnkdNpgdcpe1xbbQtXvP Fvlg== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCUEfaskD/Ux7iJS1K7bBHA+U0a9Vx2/1pHjKuBg3qPyrI76PSRksflkqY+E/qAL7hRm1sB9JR75JPVt@debbugs.gnu.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxfSlqggrF0oeEx6U8w6yJFLiGXdCLF696LFclsrQVhk7bLBl17 +ldJCMBuQN0Byi6tnDanKZKcGBkpFggHdw8S62ldYnQMcmDKS6nljqh00g== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEgFxqixde0oKD17c0Cg988meDpcK2ezV183WErlgc2OCpClGaQRO1EEVlzJafdv+55kOWoHg== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:17ce:b0:2e2:d3a0:4716 with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-2e56165ea0bmr6708854a91.18.1729342305647; Sat, 19 Oct 2024 05:51:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from terra ([2405:6586:be0:0:c8ff:1707:9b9:af89]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 98e67ed59e1d1-2e5611d601esm4035494a91.21.2024.10.19.05.51.44 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sat, 19 Oct 2024 05:51:45 -0700 (PDT) From: Maxim Cournoyer To: Guillaume Le Vaillant Subject: Re: bug#71462: Default ntp service configuration not working on IPv6 network In-Reply-To: <8734pay82o.fsf@kitej> (Guillaume Le Vaillant's message of "Tue, 18 Jun 2024 08:21:51 +0000") References: <87ikyhfbdj.fsf@kitej> <8734pay82o.fsf@kitej> Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2024 21:51:42 +0900 Message-ID: <87y12kcl29.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 71462-done Cc: 71462-done@debbugs.gnu.org, Leo Famulari X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Hi Guillaume, Guillaume Le Vaillant writes: > Leo Famulari skribis: > >> On Mon, Jun 10, 2024 at 08:30:32AM +0000, Guillaume Le Vaillant wrote: >>> On an IPv6-only network, the default configuration for ntp-service-type >>> doesn't work, because the default pool used (<0.guix.pool.ntp.org>) >>> doesn't have IPv6 addresses. >>> >>> In fact, the <1.guix.pool.ntp.org> and <3.guix.pool.ntp.org> pools don't >>> have IPv6 addresses either. Only the <2.guix.pool.ntp.org> pool works >>> with IPv6. >>> >>> Would it be possible to add IPv6 support to pools 0, 1 and 3? >> >> It's not something that we, as Guix, can do. >> >> The NTP pool is run by a separate organization, and the question of >> which DNS names should return AAAA (IPv6) records is open: >> >> https://community.ntppool.org/t/the-time-has-come-we-must-enable-ipv6-entirely/1968 >> >> However, the reason they give us 4 different addresses is so that we can >> spread the load around. Our NTP services should choose randomly at >> run-time. Or we could just make number 2 the default, and then we'll >> have IPv6 support. Or something more complicated... > > Thanks for the info. I'm now using pool 2 as the default on my IPv6-only > machines, and it works well. I've now made pool 2 our default configuration address, in commit 503919fcf0 ("services: ntp: Default to an address that supports IPv6."). Closing. -- Thanks, Maxim From unknown Mon Jun 23 18:33:01 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2024 12:24:12 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator