GNU bug report logs - #71381
[PATCH] gnu: git: Update to 2.45.2.

Previous Next

Package: guix-patches;

Reported by: ashish.is <at> lostca.se

Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2024 14:32:01 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: patch

Done: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 71381 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 71381 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.

Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.

View this report as an mbox folder, status mbox, maintainer mbox


Report forwarded to guix-patches <at> gnu.org:
bug#71381; Package guix-patches. (Wed, 05 Jun 2024 14:32:01 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Acknowledgement sent to ashish.is <at> lostca.se:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to guix-patches <at> gnu.org. (Wed, 05 Jun 2024 14:32:01 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: ashish.is <at> lostca.se
To: guix-patches <at> gnu.org
Cc: Ashish SHUKLA <ashish.is <at> lostca.se>
Subject: [PATCH] gnu: git: Update to 2.45.2.
Date: Wed,  5 Jun 2024 14:30:18 +0000
From: Ashish SHUKLA <ashish.is <at> lostca.se>

* gnu/packages/version-control.scm (git): Update to 2.45.2.

Change-Id: I6bcbc5f0f12a50cbfc0fdc51c30b26e765005d28
---
 gnu/packages/version-control.scm | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gnu/packages/version-control.scm b/gnu/packages/version-control.scm
index 4280d4fab8..559e5679b1 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/version-control.scm
+++ b/gnu/packages/version-control.scm
@@ -242,14 +242,14 @@ (define git-cross-configure-flags
 (define-public git
   (package
    (name "git")
-   (version "2.45.1")
+   (version "2.45.2")
    (source (origin
             (method url-fetch)
             (uri (string-append "mirror://kernel.org/software/scm/git/git-"
                                 version ".tar.xz"))
             (sha256
              (base32
-              "1gqj5xrlmzs4amrj7xgxx7qpqj8br8f6bk4bzcnf4yk2iq538kg6"))))
+              "1nws1vjgj54sv32wxl1h3n1jkcpabqv7a605hhafsby0n5zfigsi"))))
    (build-system gnu-build-system)
    (native-inputs
     `(("native-perl" ,perl)
@@ -269,7 +269,7 @@ (define-public git
                 version ".tar.xz"))
           (sha256
            (base32
-            "1w6r2liifafsxydmc48p578z7z70ys0spm6qp5ygdd0l26mxf8p6"))))
+            "1pqrp46kwbxycqld39027ph1cvkq9am156y3sswn6w2khsg30f09"))))
       ;; For subtree documentation.
       ("asciidoc" ,asciidoc)
       ("docbook2x" ,docbook2x)

base-commit: 425cf1fbe2fff25bda1b5eb948ce01170d23ab6a
-- 
2.45.1





bug closed, send any further explanations to 71381 <at> debbugs.gnu.org and ashish.is <at> lostca.se Request was from Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com> to control <at> debbugs.gnu.org. (Mon, 24 Jun 2024 02:55:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Information forwarded to guix-patches <at> gnu.org:
bug#71381; Package guix-patches. (Mon, 24 Jun 2024 04:09:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #10 received at 71381 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: "Ashish SHUKLA" <ashish.is <at> lostca.se>
To: <71381 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Subject: Why is this closed ?
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2024 04:07:52 +0000
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Hi!

I'm wondering why is this bug report closed, as I don't see any commit
to git derivation in the master branch atm.

Could you please elaborate ?

Thanks!
-- 
Ashish SHUKLA | GPG: F682 CDCC 39DC 0FEA E116  20B6 C746 CFA9 E74F A4B0

"If I destroy you, what business is it of yours ?" (Dark Forest, Liu Cixin)
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Information forwarded to guix-patches <at> gnu.org:
bug#71381; Package guix-patches. (Wed, 26 Jun 2024 14:26:01 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #13 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Leo Famulari <leo <at> famulari.name>
To: Ashish SHUKLA via Guix-patches via <guix-patches <at> gnu.org>
Cc: 71381 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [bug#71381] Why is this closed ?
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2024 10:25:40 -0400
On Mon, Jun 24, 2024 at 04:07:52AM +0000, Ashish SHUKLA via Guix-patches via wrote:
> I'm wondering why is this bug report closed, as I don't see any commit
> to git derivation in the master branch atm.

This patched was pushed to master as commit 26c0ff98cf4302fc69539272d646c0ef28991991

https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git/commit/?id=26c0ff98cf4302fc69539272d646c0ef28991991

Now, I see that some other change was included to
'gnu/packages/linux.scm', probably by accident. I'm going to look into
that now.

Thanks for the contribution!




Information forwarded to guix-patches <at> gnu.org:
bug#71381; Package guix-patches. (Wed, 26 Jun 2024 14:26:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Information forwarded to guix-patches <at> gnu.org:
bug#71381; Package guix-patches. (Wed, 26 Jun 2024 14:39:01 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #19 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Leo Famulari <leo <at> famulari.name>
To: Ashish SHUKLA via Guix-patches via <guix-patches <at> gnu.org>
Cc: 71381 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [bug#71381] Why is this closed ?
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2024 10:38:24 -0400
On Wed, Jun 26, 2024 at 10:25:40AM -0400, Leo Famulari wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 24, 2024 at 04:07:52AM +0000, Ashish SHUKLA via Guix-patches via wrote:
> > I'm wondering why is this bug report closed, as I don't see any commit
> > to git derivation in the master branch atm.
> 
> This patched was pushed to master as commit 26c0ff98cf4302fc69539272d646c0ef28991991
> 
> https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git/commit/?id=26c0ff98cf4302fc69539272d646c0ef28991991
> 
> Now, I see that some other change was included to
> 'gnu/packages/linux.scm', probably by accident. I'm going to look into
> that now.

I went ahead and reverted this change to bcc, leaving the Git update in
place.

Maxim, let us know if I shouldn't have done that, and the bcc change
should be reinstated.




Information forwarded to guix-patches <at> gnu.org:
bug#71381; Package guix-patches. (Wed, 26 Jun 2024 14:39:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Information forwarded to guix-patches <at> gnu.org:
bug#71381; Package guix-patches. (Wed, 26 Jun 2024 19:03:01 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #25 received at 71381-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>
To: Leo Famulari <leo <at> famulari.name>
Cc: 71381-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Ashish SHUKLA <ashish.is <at> lostca.se>
Subject: Re: [bug#71381] Why is this closed ?
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2024 15:01:17 -0400
Hi Leo,

Leo Famulari <leo <at> famulari.name> writes:

> On Wed, Jun 26, 2024 at 10:25:40AM -0400, Leo Famulari wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 24, 2024 at 04:07:52AM +0000, Ashish SHUKLA via Guix-patches via wrote:
>> > I'm wondering why is this bug report closed, as I don't see any commit
>> > to git derivation in the master branch atm.
>> 
>> This patched was pushed to master as commit 26c0ff98cf4302fc69539272d646c0ef28991991
>> 
>> https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git/commit/?id=26c0ff98cf4302fc69539272d646c0ef28991991
>> 
>> Now, I see that some other change was included to
>> 'gnu/packages/linux.scm', probably by accident. I'm going to look into
>> that now.
>
> I went ahead and reverted this change to bcc, leaving the Git update in
> place.
>
> Maxim, let us know if I shouldn't have done that, and the bcc change
> should be reinstated.

Seems I had squashed the bcc change in the wrong commit while working on
a stack of patches to commit.  It's still useful (as 'guix lint bcc'
would say), so I've reinstated that in its own commit and the git update
too:

03459ca165 master gnu: git: Update to 2.45.2.
a3b8a9627b gnu: bcc: Add bash-minimal to inputs.

Thanks for the heads-up.

-- 
Maxim




Information forwarded to guix-patches <at> gnu.org:
bug#71381; Package guix-patches. (Wed, 26 Jun 2024 19:23:01 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #28 received at 71381-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: "Leo Famulari" <leo <at> famulari.name>
To: "Maxim Cournoyer" <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 71381-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Ashish SHUKLA <ashish.is <at> lostca.se>
Subject: Re: [bug#71381] Why is this closed ?
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2024 15:21:56 -0400
On Wed, Jun 26, 2024, at 15:01, Maxim Cournoyer wrote:
> Seems I had squashed the bcc change in the wrong commit while working on
> a stack of patches to commit.  It's still useful (as 'guix lint bcc'
> would say), so I've reinstated that in its own commit and the git update
> too:

Ah, I meant to only revert the bcc changes. I am rusty!




bug archived. Request was from Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs <at> gnu.org> to internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org. (Thu, 25 Jul 2024 11:24:13 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

This bug report was last modified 1 year and 25 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.