GNU bug report logs - #71370
30.0.50; Please un-obsolete buffer-substring as a generalized variable

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Adam Porter <adam <at> alphapapa.net>

Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2024 01:34:02 UTC

Severity: wishlist

Found in version 30.0.50

Full log


Message #91 received at 71370 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: Stefan Monnier <monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca>
Cc: 71370 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, yantar92 <at> posteo.net, michael_heerdegen <at> web.de,
 stefankangas <at> gmail.com, adam <at> alphapapa.net, acorallo <at> gnu.org,
 spwhitton <at> spwhitton.name
Subject: Re: bug#71370: 30.0.50;
 Please un-obsolete buffer-substring as a generalized variable
Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2025 15:07:55 +0200
> Cc: 71370 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Ihor Radchenko <yantar92 <at> posteo.net>,
>  Stefan Kangas <stefankangas <at> gmail.com>, Adam Porter <adam <at> alphapapa.net>,
>  Andrea Corallo <acorallo <at> gnu.org>, Sean Whitton <spwhitton <at> spwhitton.name>
> Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2025 18:43:00 -0500
> From:  Stefan Monnier via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs,
>  the Swiss army knife of text editors" <bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org>
> 
> > Let's better please wait for Stefan.  I'm sure that what he has is
> > already much much better than the simplistic setter we have.  I hope he
> > continues.  And if he doesn't, we still would have to go on with his
> > approach.
> 
> I'm not sure how to continue because it mostly depends on what Stefan
> and Eli (and Andrea) can agree to do.  At this point I don't really
> understand what Eli wants.  Nobody replied to may last message from
> a week and a half ago, in that bug#76313.

Are we discussing this bug, or are we discussing bug#76313?




This bug report was last modified 84 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.