GNU bug report logs -
#71360
large manifests when adding packages
Previous Next
Full log
View this message in rfc822 format
I think (maybe part of) the problem is that inside entry->gexp in
manifest->gexp things get compared using (the hash of)
(manifest-entry-item entry) which will be a package object for the new
entries but a store path "/gnu/store/*" for packages already present in
the profile.
Also right afterwards we test if the visited previous-entry is
'manifest-entry=?' to entry again causing a potential problem if one has
a string and one a package as item entry.
Would this be worth fixing?
On 04.06.24 13:38, Dariqq wrote:
> Hi Guix,
>
> I was trying to figure out if the "repeated" tag inside a profiles
> manifest file is reliable to detect duplicate entries in a profile.
> While it was working fine for my home and system profile for the normal
> .guix-profile it was not:
>
> This is related to https://issues.guix.gnu.org/55499#0 resp.
> https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git/commit/?id=4ff12d1de7cd617b791996ee7ca1240660b4c20e which marks duplicate entries in a profiles as repeated inside the profile manifest file.
>
> * Steps to reproduce
>
> To stick with the original example: Instead of adding the r packages all
> in one add them one by one
>
> #+begin_example
> guix package -p /tmp/wrong -i r-cicero-monocle3
> guix package -p /tmp/wrong -i r-monocle3
> #+end_example
>
> The resulting manifest file at /tmp/wrong/manifest has the huge tree for
> r-monocle3 twice.
>
> So the lookup mechanism in manifest->gexp does not seem to work with the
> install mechanism of profiles. I haven't looked more deeply into it yet.
>
> An smaller example is using zlib and glib (which propagates zlib).
>
> * Expected Behaviour
>
> It should not matter whether you install things in multiple transactions
> or in one.
>
> Thanks.
This bug report was last modified 1 year and 10 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.