GNU bug report logs - #71300
[PATCH v3] doc: Document SRFI 64.

Previous Next

Package: guile;

Reported by: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>

Date: Sat, 1 Jun 2024 02:19:01 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: patch

Done: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #14 received at 71300 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Tomas Volf <~@wolfsden.cz>
To: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 71300 <at> debbugs.gnu.org,
 Filip Łajszczak <filip <at> lajszczak.dev>,
 Maxime Devos <maximedevos <at> telenet.be>
Subject: Re: bug#71300: [PATCH v4] doc: Document SRFI 64.
Date: Sun, 22 Sep 2024 14:30:16 +0200
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com> writes:

> This is an import of the 'Abstract', 'Rationale', and 'Specification'
> sections from the upstream specification text, with some manual
> adjustment.
>
> * doc/ref/srfi-modules.texi (SRFI 64): New subsection.

I think important question to ask here is whether this manual section
documents SRFI-64 or what Guile ships as SRFI-64.  Current
implementation shipped by Guile has many quirks that do not conform to
the specification.

> +@c This SRFI 64 documentation was "snarfed" from upstream specification
> +@c HTML document using the 'snarfi' script.

Based on this I believe it describes the specification.

I think either of those is fine (albeit describing the Guile's flavor
would be preferred), but is should be stated (that the behavior
described by the manual does not match the implementation shipped).

Have a nice day,
Tomas

-- 
There are only two hard things in Computer Science:
cache invalidation, naming things and off-by-one errors.
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

This bug report was last modified 145 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.