Subject: bug#71214: closed (Re: bug#71214: bordeaux linux-libre-6.8.10-guix.tar.gz corrupt nar)

From: [email-masked] (GNU bug Tracking System)
Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2024 13:11:03 +0000

Your bug report

#71214: bordeaux linux-libre-6.8.10-guix.tar.gz corrupt nar

which was filed against the guix package, has been closed.

The explanation is attached below, along with your original report.
If you require more details, please reply to [email-masked].

-- 
71214: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=71214
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact [email-masked] with problems

Subject: Re: bug#71214: bordeaux linux-libre-6.8.10-guix.tar.gz corrupt nar
From: Richard Sent <[email-masked]>
To: Christopher Baines <[email-masked]>
Cc: [email-masked]
Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2024 08:54:12 -0400
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>

Christopher Baines <[email-masked]> writes:

> I've investigated this now

Thanks for looking into this!

-- 
Take it easy,
Richard Sent
Making my computer weirder one commit at a time.

Subject: bordeaux linux-libre-6.8.10-guix.tar.gz corrupt nar
From: Richard Sent <[email-masked]>
To: [email-masked]
Date: Sun, 26 May 2024 15:01:55 -0400
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>

Hi Guix!

The nar for
/gnu/store/y813phs2n9xnb7zbcr07g0j9509bzbsb-linux-libre-6.8.10-guix.tar.xz
on Bordeaux seems to have been corrupted by some mechanism. The URL in
question is

> URL: nar/none/y813phs2n9xnb7zbcr07g0j9509bzbsb-linux-libre-6.8.10-guix.tar.xz

>From comments by cbaines on an earlier issue [1] that had misdiagnosed
the problem:

> Yeah, something's up here specifically with the bordeaux build farm,
> feel free to open a new issue.
> 
> You can tell something is wrong just by looking at the narinfo:
> 
>   https://bordeaux.guix.gnu.org/y813phs2n9xnb7zbcr07g0j9509bzbsb.narinfo
> 
> Given there's no compression here, the file size should be the same as
> the nar size, but it's not, it's missing a few bytes.

For reference:

> NarSize: 143081664
> Compression: none
> FileSize: 143081472

On a related note, whatever issue is going on here seems to cause [2].
The actual issues are distinct.

[1]: https://issues.guix.gnu.org/71133
[2]: https://issues.guix.gnu.org/71160
-- 
Take it easy,
Richard Sent
Making my computer weirder one commit at a time.