GNU bug report logs - #71202
gnu: lisp.scm: add roswell package

Previous Next

Package: guix-patches;

Reported by: not emma <bigbookofbug <at> proton.me>

Date: Sun, 26 May 2024 02:28:01 UTC

Severity: normal

Done: Guillaume Le Vaillant <glv <at> posteo.net>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Guillaume Le Vaillant <glv <at> posteo.net>
Cc: tracker <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#71202: closed (gnu: lisp.scm: add roswell package)
Date: Tue, 28 May 2024 13:49:01 +0000
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Your message dated Tue, 28 May 2024 13:47:43 +0000
with message-id <875xuynj40.fsf <at> kitej>
and subject line Re: [bug#71202] gnu: lisp.scm: add roswell package
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #71202,
regarding gnu: lisp.scm: add roswell package
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs <at> gnu.org.)


-- 
71202: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=71202
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems
[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]
From: not emma <bigbookofbug <at> proton.me>
To: "guix-patches <at> gnu.org" <guix-patches <at> gnu.org>
Subject: gnu: lisp.scm: add roswell package
Date: Sun, 26 May 2024 02:26:29 +0000
[Message part 3 (text/plain, inline)]
I was unsure whether this would fit better under lisp.scm, or lisp-xyz.scm, but think the former is a better choice because it's independent of any specific common lisp implementation.

Sent with [Proton Mail](https://proton.me/) secure email.
[Message part 4 (text/html, inline)]
[roswell-diff.scm (text/x-scheme, attachment)]
[Message part 6 (message/rfc822, inline)]
From: Guillaume Le Vaillant <glv <at> posteo.net>
To: not emma <bigbookofbug <at> proton.me>
Cc: 71202-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [bug#71202] gnu: lisp.scm: add roswell package
Date: Tue, 28 May 2024 13:47:43 +0000
[Message part 7 (text/plain, inline)]
Patch applied as 542b18709a46e361de8f25e3fece29860532743c with a few
modifications.
Thanks.
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

This bug report was last modified 1 year and 50 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.