GNU bug report logs - #71117
30.0.50; output of describe-function

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Andreas Röhler <andreas.roehler <at> easy-emacs.de>

Date: Wed, 22 May 2024 13:54:01 UTC

Severity: normal

Found in version 30.0.50

Done: Andrea Corallo <acorallo <at> gnu.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #53 received at 71117 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: Kévin Le Gouguec <kevin.legouguec <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 71117 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, acorallo <at> gnu.org, andreas.roehler <at> easy-emacs.de
Subject: Re: bug#71117: 30.0.50; output of describe-function
Date: Wed, 29 May 2024 14:38:49 +0300
> From: Kévin Le Gouguec <kevin.legouguec <at> gmail.com>
> Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>,  71117 <at> debbugs.gnu.org,
>   andreas.roehler <at> easy-emacs.de
> Date: Wed, 29 May 2024 00:04:26 +0200
> 
> I don't actually have concrete examples where my allegedly-not-so-smart
> serving suggestion might fail 😉 The best I can come up with are
> what-ifs, e.g. "what if a user advises describe-* functions to rename
> *Help* buffers to something non-standard like *Help <SYM>*";

First, AFAICT describe-* functions don't know about the name of the
buffer.  So advising them will not affect the buffer name.

Second, if someone advises the functions which do know about that,
they have an uphill battle to fight, and IMNSHO they get what they
deserve.

Last, but not least, if we want to be holier that the Pope, we can use
the function help-buffer to get at the buffer, whatever its name.




This bug report was last modified 357 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.