GNU bug report logs - #71094
[PATCH] Prefer to run find and grep in parallel in rgrep

Previous Next

Full log

Message #80 received at 71094 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Spencer Baugh <sbaugh <at> janestreet.com>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
Cc: rgm <at> gnu.org, 71094 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, dmitry <at> gutov.dev
Subject: Re: bug#71094: [PATCH] Prefer to run find and grep in parallel in
 rgrep
Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2024 10:03:01 -0400

Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> writes:
>> From: Spencer Baugh <sbaugh <at> janestreet.com>
>> Cc: rgm <at> gnu.org,  71094 <at> debbugs.gnu.org,  dmitry <at> gutov.dev
>> Date: Thu, 30 May 2024 08:29:04 -0400
>> 
>> Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> writes:
>> 
>> >> From: Spencer Baugh <sbaugh <at> janestreet.com>
>> >> Cc: rgm <at> gnu.org,  71094 <at> debbugs.gnu.org,  dmitry <at> gutov.dev
>> >> Date: Wed, 22 May 2024 08:54:25 -0400
>> >> 
>> >> > In any case, please modify the patch so that 'exec-plus' is still
>> >> > preferred on MS-Windows (because most Windows ports of xargs are IME
>> >> > abysmally buggy, so better avoided as much as possible).
>> >> >
>> >> > A comment there with the justification of the order will also be
>> >> > appreciated.
>> >> 
>> >> Done, attached.
>> >
>> > Thanks, LGTM.
>> 
>> So is this OK to install now?
>
> As far as I'm concerned, yes.  I don't know if the other participants
> of this discussion are okay with this or they still have some
> comments.

Since no-one else has made any comments, could this be installed now?

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.