GNU bug report logs - #71094
[PATCH] Prefer to run find and grep in parallel in rgrep

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Spencer Baugh <sbaugh <at> janestreet.com>

Date: Tue, 21 May 2024 14:36:01 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: patch

Done: Andrea Corallo <acorallo <at> gnu.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: Spencer Baugh <sbaugh <at> janestreet.com>
Cc: rgm <at> gnu.org, 71094 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, dmitry <at> gutov.dev
Subject: bug#71094: [PATCH] Prefer to run find and grep in parallel in rgrep
Date: Thu, 30 May 2024 17:52:25 +0300
> From: Spencer Baugh <sbaugh <at> janestreet.com>
> Cc: rgm <at> gnu.org,  71094 <at> debbugs.gnu.org,  dmitry <at> gutov.dev
> Date: Thu, 30 May 2024 08:29:04 -0400
> 
> Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> writes:
> 
> >> From: Spencer Baugh <sbaugh <at> janestreet.com>
> >> Cc: rgm <at> gnu.org,  71094 <at> debbugs.gnu.org,  dmitry <at> gutov.dev
> >> Date: Wed, 22 May 2024 08:54:25 -0400
> >> 
> >> > In any case, please modify the patch so that 'exec-plus' is still
> >> > preferred on MS-Windows (because most Windows ports of xargs are IME
> >> > abysmally buggy, so better avoided as much as possible).
> >> >
> >> > A comment there with the justification of the order will also be
> >> > appreciated.
> >> 
> >> Done, attached.
> >
> > Thanks, LGTM.
> 
> So is this OK to install now?

As far as I'm concerned, yes.  I don't know if the other participants
of this discussion are okay with this or they still have some
comments.




This bug report was last modified 326 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.