GNU bug report logs - #71094
[PATCH] Prefer to run find and grep in parallel in rgrep

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Spencer Baugh <sbaugh <at> janestreet.com>

Date: Tue, 21 May 2024 14:36:01 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: patch

Done: Andrea Corallo <acorallo <at> gnu.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: Spencer Baugh <sbaugh <at> janestreet.com>
Cc: rgm <at> gnu.org, 71094 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, dmitry <at> gutov.dev
Subject: bug#71094: [PATCH] Prefer to run find and grep in parallel in rgrep
Date: Thu, 30 May 2024 17:52:25 +0300
> From: Spencer Baugh <sbaugh <at> janestreet.com>
> Cc: rgm <at> gnu.org,  71094 <at> debbugs.gnu.org,  dmitry <at> gutov.dev
> Date: Thu, 30 May 2024 08:29:04 -0400
> 
> Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> writes:
> 
> >> From: Spencer Baugh <sbaugh <at> janestreet.com>
> >> Cc: rgm <at> gnu.org,  71094 <at> debbugs.gnu.org,  dmitry <at> gutov.dev
> >> Date: Wed, 22 May 2024 08:54:25 -0400
> >> 
> >> > In any case, please modify the patch so that 'exec-plus' is still
> >> > preferred on MS-Windows (because most Windows ports of xargs are IME
> >> > abysmally buggy, so better avoided as much as possible).
> >> >
> >> > A comment there with the justification of the order will also be
> >> > appreciated.
> >> 
> >> Done, attached.
> >
> > Thanks, LGTM.
> 
> So is this OK to install now?

As far as I'm concerned, yes.  I don't know if the other participants
of this discussion are okay with this or they still have some
comments.




This bug report was last modified 1 year and 14 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.