Subject: bug#71068: 30.0.50; Incorrect xref positions for eglot-execute

From: Dmitry Gutov <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 29 May 2024 04:37:00 +0300

On 26/05/2024 11:00, Eshel Yaron wrote:
> +    (or (and (re-search-forward (format cl--generic-find-defgeneric-regexp name)
> +                                nil t)
> +             (or (funcall search ":method[ \t\n]+"
> +                          (save-excursion (end-of-defun) (point)))
> +                 (not (goto-char (point-min)))))
> +        (funcall search base-re)

Should the second clause also be wrapped in some save-excursion or similar?

And I'd probably change the order (looking for the variations on 
defmethod first), but that's not too important.