From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Sep 25 20:04:27 2010 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Sep 2010 00:04:27 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OzejD-0005Ib-6Z for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 25 Sep 2010 20:04:27 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OzejA-0005IW-IM for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 25 Sep 2010 20:04:25 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ozeln-0006O9-MA for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 25 Sep 2010 20:07:08 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.1 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]:37890) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ozeln-0006O5-KN for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 25 Sep 2010 20:07:07 -0400 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=38951 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ozell-0004xo-Sv for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 25 Sep 2010 20:07:07 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ozelk-0006Np-N4 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 25 Sep 2010 20:07:05 -0400 Received: from mailout1-4.pacific.net.au ([61.8.2.211]:42715 helo=mailout1.pacific.net.au) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ozelk-0006NN-B5 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 25 Sep 2010 20:07:04 -0400 Received: from mailproxy1.pacific.net.au (mailproxy1.pacific.net.au [61.8.2.162]) by mailout1.pacific.net.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98F805D804D for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 10:06:58 +1000 (EST) Received: from blah.blah (ppp2FF9.dyn.pacific.net.au [61.8.47.249]) by mailproxy1.pacific.net.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DD518C0A for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 10:06:56 +1000 (EST) Received: from gg by blah.blah with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1OzelP-0005AG-U8 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 10:06:43 +1000 From: Kevin Ryde To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Subject: 23.2; walk-windows docstring "WINDOW" Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 10:06:43 +1000 Message-ID: <87zkv5id0s.fsf@blah.blah> User-Agent: Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-Spam-Score: -5.5 (-----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -5.5 (-----) The docstring of walk-windows says, ALL-FRAMES nil or omitted means cycle through all windows on WINDOW's frame, ... Anything else means cycle through all windows on WINDOW's frame and no others. but I couldn't tell what WINDOW is referring to there. Is it too much cut and paste from `next-window'? Does "WINDOW's frame" in each of those places in fact means the selected frame, per the Emacs 22 docstring? In GNU Emacs 23.2.1 (i486-pc-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 2.20.0) of 2010-05-16 on raven, modified by Debian configured using `configure '--build' 'i486-linux-gnu' '--build' 'i486-linux-gnu' '--prefix=/usr' '--sharedstatedir=/var/lib' '--libexecdir=/usr/lib' '--localstatedir=/var/lib' '--infodir=/usr/share/info' '--mandir=/usr/share/man' '--with-pop=yes' '--enable-locallisppath=/etc/emacs23:/etc/emacs:/usr/local/share/emacs/23.2/site-lisp:/usr/local/share/emacs/site-lisp:/usr/share/emacs/23.2/site-lisp:/usr/share/emacs/site-lisp:/usr/share/emacs/23.2/leim' '--with-x=yes' '--with-x-toolkit=gtk' '--with-toolkit-scroll-bars' 'build_alias=i486-linux-gnu' 'CFLAGS=-DDEBIAN -g -O2' 'LDFLAGS=-g' 'CPPFLAGS='' From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Sep 25 20:38:49 2010 Received: (at 7105-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Sep 2010 00:38:50 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OzfGT-0005a6-0e for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 25 Sep 2010 20:38:49 -0400 Received: from mail-iw0-f172.google.com ([209.85.214.172]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OzfGR-0005a1-4Y for 7105-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 25 Sep 2010 20:38:47 -0400 Received: by iwn3 with SMTP id 3so3477112iwn.3 for <7105-done@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 25 Sep 2010 17:41:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=QyND0T/sDJm5xpZ9q6aEJ0EXHiMbu8uHIg9ByuieDkY=; b=DfM1qY4NOWAxWxnkIA2AomAL3z4kPGBEd0rPzq5ejf7lBPNapGb83HL3fhYrWmfdAw 40+/FHL12hBm5dzj0sGt3ZbHCNEL6vFTQH+idaLaxHZgDN76VqA958rZhFx92rmh87JK akGlWT4S1L7jw/8KpmBsZK/lmsb6SxENzzVTE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=Avon5W2QpieVdSXpoMEhFO9WN7+Htliz6YStPJ5xScD1xFPm62S7ch8twTI5y7trJB IKBUTcMUxfLQWP4TtYeBhkcE9teLhfWzX2TRU5wchU/I7z1urpnRaWkgdHlzENsONfGh 6me5/ROTFIf4MxwWiubsjbdq5ClTcYX7ctua8= Received: by 10.231.191.147 with SMTP id dm19mr6590907ibb.6.1285461690571; Sat, 25 Sep 2010 17:41:30 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.196.71 with HTTP; Sat, 25 Sep 2010 17:40:50 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87zkv5id0s.fsf@blah.blah> References: <87zkv5id0s.fsf@blah.blah> From: Juanma Barranquero Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 02:40:50 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#7105: 23.2; walk-windows docstring "WINDOW" To: Kevin Ryde Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -2.7 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 7105-done Cc: 7105-done@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.7 (--) On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 02:06, Kevin Ryde wrote: > Does "WINDOW's frame" > in each of those places in fact means the selected frame, per the Emacs > 22 docstring? Yes. Fixed, thanks. =C2=A0 =C2=A0 Juanma From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Sep 26 04:56:31 2010 Received: (at 7105) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Sep 2010 08:56:31 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ozn27-0000Rh-2E for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 04:56:31 -0400 Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([213.165.64.23] helo=mail.gmx.net) by debbugs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ozn24-0000Rc-4V for 7105@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 04:56:29 -0400 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 26 Sep 2010 08:59:11 -0000 Received: from 62-47-63-90.adsl.highway.telekom.at (EHLO [62.47.63.90]) [62.47.63.90] by mail.gmx.net (mp071) with SMTP; 26 Sep 2010 10:59:11 +0200 X-Authenticated: #14592706 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX18zMYh6CvYzrdzybSTQfozZZYxsltJxUfPMfPFNSK NmnP3VETPTWTwv Message-ID: <4C9F0B5E.1090300@gmx.at> Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 10:59:10 +0200 From: martin rudalics User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Windows/20090302) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: 7105@debbugs.gnu.org, lekktu@gmail.com Subject: Re: bug#7105: 23.2; walk-windows docstring "WINDOW" References: <87zkv5id0s.fsf@blah.blah> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 7105 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--) >> Does "WINDOW's frame" >> in each of those places in fact means the selected frame, per the Emacs >> 22 docstring? > > Yes. > > Fixed, thanks. My bad. Thanks to both of you for reporting and fixing. martin From unknown Sat Jun 14 19:02:50 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2010 11:24:03 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator