GNU bug report logs - #71038
[PATCH 0/2] Enable specifying the available builtin builders.

Previous Next

Package: guix-patches;

Reported by: Christopher Baines <mail <at> cbaines.net>

Date: Sat, 18 May 2024 13:13:01 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: patch

Done: Christopher Baines <mail <at> cbaines.net>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: Christopher Baines <mail <at> cbaines.net>
To: Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com>
Cc: Josselin Poiret <dev <at> jpoiret.xyz>, Mathieu Othacehe <othacehe <at> gnu.org>, Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me <at> tobias.gr>, Ricardo Wurmus <rekado <at> elephly.net>, Christopher Baines <guix <at> cbaines.net>, 71038 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: [bug#71038] [PATCH 1/2] guix: store: Enable specifying the available builtin builders.
Date: Sun, 26 May 2024 09:10:40 +0100
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com> writes:

> On sam., 18 mai 2024 at 14:19, Christopher Baines <mail <at> cbaines.net> wrote:
>
>> diff --git a/guix/store.scm b/guix/store.scm
>> index 58ddaa8d15..0c734cdca7 100644
>> --- a/guix/store.scm
>> +++ b/guix/store.scm
>> @@ -571,7 +571,7 @@ (define* (connect-to-daemon uri #:key non-blocking?)
>>
>>  (define* (open-connection #:optional (uri (%daemon-socket-uri))
>>                            #:key port (reserve-space? #t) cpu-affinity
>> -                          non-blocking?)
>> +                          non-blocking? assume-available-builtin-builders)
>
> Why add the variable %assume-available-builtin-builders and default to
> it?
>
> Something like:
>
> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
> (define %assume-available-builtin-builders
>   "List of builtin builders supported by the builder Guix daemon."
>   (list "download" "git-download"))
>
> (define* (open-connection #:optional (uri (%daemon-socket-uri))
>                           #:key port (reserve-space? #t) cpu-affinity
>                           non-blocking?)
>                           non-blocking?
>                           (assume-available-builtin-builders %assume-available-builtin-builders))
> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
>
> And then default to this %assume-available-builtin-builders elsewhere in
> [PATCH 2/2].  IMHO, it changes almost nothing but it would help to know
> (document) what to pass as argument.

I think it's sensible to not use a fixed list by default, but check what
the daemon supports.
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

This bug report was last modified 1 year ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.