GNU bug report logs -
#70982
test suite failures on OpenBSD
Previous Next
Reported by: Bruno Haible <bruno <at> clisp.org>
Date: Thu, 16 May 2024 13:48:01 UTC
Severity: normal
Done: Ileana Dumitrescu <ileanadumitrescu95 <at> gmail.com>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
Full log
Message #13 received at 70982-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Hi Ileana,
Ileana Dumitrescu wrote:
> Tests 34 and 81 have been fixed [1] with these commits [2][3] in
> OpenBSD, and an additional test, 173, for using local versions of shared
> libraries is fixed by utilizing functionality added in this commit [4].
> The entire OpenBSD testsuite should be fixed in development now!
>
> [1] https://github.com/gnu-libtool/ci-check/actions/runs/11726885546
> [2]
> https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/libtool.git/commit/?h=development&id=7c310c9b0439a020add4c23d84ab33eeb486bd75
> [3]
> https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/libtool.git/commit/?h=development&id=c7bfd6884ceae4e792b17c9ea89097e8d00dbe2b
> [4]
> https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/libtool.git/commit/?h=development&id=3996b1fddcaa543c8bf349314cac3ab4b07b4d1d
Thanks for working on this!
However, there are two things that I don't understand:
* Why two options, --test and --check, that do the same thing?
In my understanding, "check" means doing a "test" with the a certain
expectation, whereas "test" is unbiased.
* In which situations is the user expected to pass one of these options?
- Is it only for libtool's own test suite?
- Is it also for the test suite of a package (like GNU gettext)?
If yes, does this mean that instead of executing a program through
../src/prog <some_arguments>
the package's test suite needs to run
../libtool --mode=execute --test ../src/prog <some_arguments> ?
And what about interactive invocations of src/prog then?
Bruno
This bug report was last modified 268 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.