Subject: bug#7083: closed (Re: bug#7083: Why is `copy-tree's symbol-plist carrying side-effect-free error-free?)

From: [email-masked] (GNU bug Tracking System)
Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2010 21:34:02 +0000

Your bug report

#7083: Why is `copy-tree's symbol-plist carrying side-effect-free error-free?

which was filed against the emacs package, has been closed.

The explanation is attached below, along with your original report.
If you require more details, please reply to [email-masked].

-- 
7083: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=7083
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact [email-masked] with problems

Subject: Re: bug#7083: Why is `copy-tree's symbol-plist carrying side-effect-free error-free?
From: Andreas Schwab <[email-masked]>
To: MON KEY <[email-masked]>
Cc: [email-masked]
Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2010 23:35:56 +0200
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>

MON KEY <[email-masked]> writes:

> It (potentially) `nconc's `nreverse's and `aset's the TREE arg recursively.

Only the copy.

Andreas.

-- 
Andreas Schwab, [email-masked]
GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756  01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."

Subject: Why is `copy-tree's symbol-plist carrying side-effect-free error-free?
From: MON KEY <[email-masked]>
To: [email-masked]
Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2010 02:31:41 -0400
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>

Why is `copy-tree' side-effect-free error-free?

(symbol-plist 'copy-tree)
=> (side-effect-free error-free)

It (potentially) `nconc's `nreverse's and `aset's the TREE arg recursively.

At revno: 45675 `copy-tree' was moved into subr.el from cl.el

,----
|
| committer: Colin Walters <[email-masked]>
| timestamp: Sat 2002-06-08 20:48:15 +0000
| message:
|   (copy-list): Moved here from cl.el.
|   (copy-tree): Renamed here from `cl-copy-tree' in cl.el.
|
`----

--
/s_P\