GNU bug report logs - #70784
Abolish string resizing

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: Po Lu <luangruo <at> yahoo.com>
To: Drew Adams <drew.adams <at> oracle.com>
Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>, "70784 <at> debbugs.gnu.org" <70784 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>, "mattias.engdegard <at> gmail.com" <mattias.engdegard <at> gmail.com>, "monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca" <monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca>
Subject: bug#70784: Abolish string resizing
Date: Mon, 06 May 2024 09:01:16 +0800

Drew Adams <drew.adams <at> oracle.com> writes:

> No, I didn't - you did.  I said nothing about
> any enemies of Lisp, nor did I suggest that
> anyone here is an enemy of Lisp.
>
> Please stop with the hyperbole and insinuation.
> You appear to be trying to spin my position
> into something it's not.
>
> It would be a mistake, IMHO, to do away with
> mutable strings or lists in Elisp.  That's my
> opinion: that would _impoverish Lisp_.  The
> former (make strings immutable) is exactly the
> question raised in this thread, IIUC.
>
> It would also be unfortunate to do away with
> the use of nil as meaning false, or as the
> empty list.  Again, that would _impoverish
> Lisp_.  That's my opinion.
>
> Such suggestions don't jibe with Lisp; they
> would, in effect mutate Lisp away from its
> fundament.  Let's not go down that road.

I agree, but alas, the dubious practice of removing time-honored
facilities for their supposed disuse, virtually on impulse, and giving
Emacs a new motto inspired by line 6186 of dispnew.c, is much in vogue
with Mattias these days.

One can only hope that calmer heads will prevail.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.