From unknown Wed Jun 18 23:18:07 2025 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.509 (Entity 5.509) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 From: bug#70779 <70779@debbugs.gnu.org> To: bug#70779 <70779@debbugs.gnu.org> Subject: Status: [PATCH] Emacs 30 and warning about missing lexical-binding declaration Reply-To: bug#70779 <70779@debbugs.gnu.org> Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2025 06:18:07 +0000 retitle 70779 [PATCH] Emacs 30 and warning about missing lexical-binding de= claration reassign 70779 auctex submitter 70779 Arash Esbati severity 70779 normal tag 70779 patch thanks From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun May 05 07:04:08 2024 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 May 2024 11:04:08 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59120 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1s3Zf5-00015n-Rk for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 05 May 2024 07:04:08 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:470:142::17]:36282) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1s3Zf4-00014e-4s for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 05 May 2024 07:04:07 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1s3Zea-0004u0-Es for bug-auctex@gnu.org; Sun, 05 May 2024 07:03:37 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1s3ZeZ-0006X3-Pu for bug-auctex@gnu.org; Sun, 05 May 2024 07:03:36 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-Version:Date:Subject:To:From:in-reply-to: references; bh=Tw9sNfO6ncxX5uF/DlC9aiE5fCwG8GZT0gh7uTK9Yb4=; b=pwTphJiZmQZusQ 2+YrQB6pq0OtzexbtujfiymR+QWSuEc0veKVuo8eQYEx8xSib2PXjGPD9A+DPLytfWYSM7TaPFcRN K9mOuMFeky6marhx+cnbF0FYZhOwP65ayrreByzvdtfjvmfiesz0qxjVro+lv8nAZJdq7/NWZQ5JI nfZJfp3qNg+xqRN+AhM7gA+0Eez7TMzGGbvfhA02smjKpWwyj1qKTZZWIIU9JlqTmgwCp4haw34B8 TSiwHAFS07T1XY8iXi4nSfr8E4O1e34eiP4b2LBI/nzljx7le49QPe0PVUnwASMyXKiKww9G0AJmw YfhNYDm7mmfa/BvAWuog==; From: Arash Esbati To: "auctex-bugs" Subject: [PATCH] Emacs 30 and warning about missing lexical-binding declaration Date: Sun, 05 May 2024 13:03:26 +0200 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Hi all, Emacs 30 now emits a warning when it loads an .el file without the lexical-binding cookie (commits 81bad84a6 and 1121f17d7c). This is the entry from Emacs NEWS: *** Warn about missing 'lexical-binding' directive. The compiler now warns if an Elisp file lacks the standard '-*- lexical-binding: ... -*-' cookie on the first line. This line typically looks something like ;;; My little pony mode -*- lexical-binding: t -*- It is needed to inform the compiler about which dialect of ELisp your code is using: the modern dialect with lexical binding or the old dialect with only dynamic binding. Lexical binding avoids some name conflicts and allows the compiler to detect more mistakes and generate more efficient code, so it is recommended. For how to adapt your code to lexical binding, see the manual section "(elisp) Converting to Lexical Binding". If your code cannot be converted to lexical binding, you can insert the line ;;; -*- lexical-binding: nil -*- first in the file to declare that it uses the old dialect. This change affects all auto-parsed style files when AUCTeX loads them. I suggest the following change to `TeX-auto-store' in tex.el: --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- diff --git a/tex.el b/tex.el index cda1d7f6..32cfd21e 100644 --- a/tex.el +++ b/tex.el @@ -4267,6 +4267,8 @@ If TEX is a directory, generate style files for all files in the directory." (TeX-unload-style style) (with-current-buffer (generate-new-buffer file) (erase-buffer) + (insert (concat ";;" (make-string 40 ?\s) + "-*- lexical-binding: t; -*-\n\n")) (insert "(TeX-add-style-hook\n \"" style "\"\n (lambda ()") (unless (string= tex-cmd-opts "") --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- Any comments welcome. Best, Arash From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun May 05 08:43:31 2024 Received: (at 70779) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 May 2024 12:43:32 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59534 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1s3bDE-0004h8-0A for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 05 May 2024 08:43:31 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:51444) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1s3bDA-0004h1-B1 for 70779@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 05 May 2024 08:43:27 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1s3bCh-00063i-Ci for 70779@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 05 May 2024 08:42:55 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-Version:Date:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:To: From; bh=seyh5bO+VyCT5bbsdRqZFrzQFqA167jriMXXZuJIAMA=; b=aOUExwJXPRo5Plvlxwrx GPLyMRP2B9bLpnMBeJKMaZe3WUGI2ZqYbh6Z64hOhiDDAhB1ifyHrecNvJthc6UVJRkIZuqJUqsa9 PLr1HCTHrcslGkBE6bJT7YuLsVNfqxO4ooZETQkqAmTXLHrY2vM+6MSEP4lYCxLAZMVUYA6A1Vo24 8CL4h+RBBuscO0JcVyJE04IYRbEvOSgq9tVhJnuxheoXnw8TJjhP/WM5RqiDF6wfpsMpjOTyOV7Du 53gHNcZuEoFJDaGnOw6w/o/4Fn5viceNwoKo5jBP3OcnmrTLh1zH4p/I7ryOzEWbt2ywyi0f7MZAy AzdW71T0Om4LDQ==; From: Arash Esbati To: 70779@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#70779: [PATCH] Emacs 30 and warning about missing lexical-binding declaration In-Reply-To: (Arash Esbati's message of "Sun, 05 May 2024 13:03:26 +0200") References: Date: Sun, 05 May 2024 14:42:51 +0200 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 70779 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Arash Esbati writes: > I suggest the following change to `TeX-auto-store' in tex.el: Which can be reduced to: --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- diff --git a/tex.el b/tex.el index cda1d7f6..30f80c7e 100644 --- a/tex.el +++ b/tex.el @@ -4267,6 +4267,7 @@ If TEX is a directory, generate style files for all files in the directory." (TeX-unload-style style) (with-current-buffer (generate-new-buffer file) (erase-buffer) + (insert ";;" (make-string 40 ?\s) "-*- lexical-binding: t; -*-\n\n") (insert "(TeX-add-style-hook\n \"" style "\"\n (lambda ()") (unless (string= tex-cmd-opts "") --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- Any comments welcome. Best, Arash From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon May 06 01:28:01 2024 Received: (at 70779) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 May 2024 05:28:01 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35723 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1s3qtM-0004Mx-TM for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 06 May 2024 01:28:01 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:56030) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1s3qtL-0004Mr-9c for 70779@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 06 May 2024 01:27:59 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1s3qsr-0004T6-Ps for 70779@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 06 May 2024 01:27:29 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-Version:Date:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:To: From; bh=eHXNHVfZAv0gJ3/JPYZauVj5Nu98AQcAb3xXRWN3/uo=; b=i0Pj4DJAcK8GB/qXcm1j /i/30I9zd/HLsYztERpVqp15ldU+5xT+6mv4odxR++CY5yWt6c/vX/DTsMSDsKT/C/fsZSUuwf070 fW+22DVWqzPglNDLbhrf5bDowiCClPrSjyMArU2B9knS6pN8jXSsc1n1mNFUgZBk+R5fvbCxzesQb P2Fj+BDcwXD2NT/OsR4IMt1XgQoJYPjFzNI8AFl+Lsv1JFi7KOS5qgPJchtE4VBeatzUwfxfr+3gO Q7ToDmlGANJOz6vsIyAHKM6ma4MVFRuogK04SmDg6eEvqKKg2Nx9wEmyI9np/UnpuczuqqDaa0m/z 6yTsBDj+TSxZlA==; From: Arash Esbati To: 70779@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#70779: [PATCH] Emacs 30 and warning about missing lexical-binding declaration In-Reply-To: (Arash Esbati's message of "Sun, 05 May 2024 14:42:51 +0200") References: Date: Mon, 06 May 2024 07:27:26 +0200 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 70779 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Arash Esbati writes: > Arash Esbati writes: > >> I suggest the following change to `TeX-auto-store' in tex.el: > > Which can be reduced to: > > diff --git a/tex.el b/tex.el > index cda1d7f6..30f80c7e 100644 > --- a/tex.el > +++ b/tex.el > @@ -4267,6 +4267,7 @@ If TEX is a directory, generate style files for all files in the directory." > (TeX-unload-style style) > (with-current-buffer (generate-new-buffer file) > (erase-buffer) > + (insert ";;" (make-string 40 ?\s) "-*- lexical-binding: t; -*-\n\n") > (insert "(TeX-add-style-hook\n \"" > style "\"\n (lambda ()") > (unless (string= tex-cmd-opts "") That change in Emacs in reverted (d51de0c5d9), but still, I think we can turn lexical-binding on in auto-parsed style files as well. I will install this in a day or two if there are no other comments. Best, Arash From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon May 06 02:56:44 2024 Received: (at 70779) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 May 2024 06:56:44 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36113 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1s3sHD-0005JK-S5 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 06 May 2024 02:56:44 -0400 Received: from smtp1a.inetd.co.jp ([210.129.88.11]:40902) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1s3sH9-0005JC-8f for 70779@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 06 May 2024 02:56:41 -0400 Received: from localhost (42-144-18-247.rev.home.ne.jp [42.144.18.247]) by smtp1a.inetd.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C9EF86C; Mon, 6 May 2024 15:56:11 +0900 (JST) From: Ikumi Keita To: Arash Esbati Subject: Re: bug#70779: [PATCH] Emacs 30 and warning about missing lexical-binding declaration In-reply-to: References: Comments: In-reply-to Arash Esbati message dated "Mon, 06 May 2024 07:27:26 +0200." X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.8; Emacs 29.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <2787.1714978571.1@localhost> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Mon, 06 May 2024 15:56:11 +0900 Message-ID: <2789.1714978571@localhost> X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 70779 Cc: 70779@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Hi Arash, >>>>> Arash Esbati writes: > That change in Emacs in reverted (d51de0c5d9), but still, I think we can > turn lexical-binding on in auto-parsed style files as well. I will > install this in a day or two if there are no other comments. I'm not actually against your proposal, but why do we need 40 spaces here? >> + (insert ";;" (make-string 40 ?\s) "-*- lexical-binding: t; -= *-\n\n") ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Best regards, Ikumi Keita #StandWithUkraine #StopWarInUkraine #Gaza #StopMassiveKilling #CeasefireNOW From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon May 06 07:57:36 2024 Received: (at 70779) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 May 2024 11:57:36 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37646 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1s3wyO-0003Bt-6S for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 06 May 2024 07:57:36 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:37788) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1s3wyM-0003BZ-Ho for 70779@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 06 May 2024 07:57:35 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1s3wxq-0002Eh-W4; Mon, 06 May 2024 07:57:03 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-Version:Date:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:To: From; bh=Az94i9RTYLtiLGiOcOqje6g/OIo5vJzRmTozHmm8abw=; b=TlYvz1iVnJ0jZvHEhJfA +E1mTn4YjQBfAyL6HxkW4Mg/VEzpjkyixRpeoYY0qifvzm8GkZ06QN9qkauIhOuspKj2HlPoGdJPu MWo/RHgIt6qE6Q/GPcj2Kwvcme0lSG1Hnobkohyp+ZeRYWhZ+KqkDOwgU6BSYy1Iv6H3z3vz5EGvu cHDM6DRW71+CpD0MYdO1rEJEMaN0Q3X5fuKSuAQNr/9FpyMxe8hA/VN1BdnaqRdmNv+hyV3qd3odP qBzy+RrP4GYaA6SfxjaxJDYK7wRPbiXsu8YOhi11Vs7L5p4W0y9dQJQ1EE4MVhlmj3+jaLAzSo9fz F6DxqhYlN8oHYA==; From: Arash Esbati To: Ikumi Keita Subject: Re: bug#70779: [PATCH] Emacs 30 and warning about missing lexical-binding declaration In-Reply-To: <2789.1714978571@localhost> (Ikumi Keita's message of "Mon, 06 May 2024 15:56:11 +0900") References: <2789.1714978571@localhost> Date: Mon, 06 May 2024 13:56:47 +0200 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 70779 Cc: 70779@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Hi Keita, Ikumi Keita writes: > I'm not actually against your proposal, but why do we need 40 spaces here? > >>> + (insert ";;" (make-string 40 ?\s) "-*- lexical-binding: t; -*-\n\n") Thanks for your response; we don't really need them, it was driven by my habit of having prop-lines justified right. A simple ;; -*- lexical-binding: t; looked odd to me. What do you think is appropriate? I don't have a strong opinion on this (and actually, I think I've found another more serious bug while looking at the auto-generated file which I will report.) Best, Arash From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon May 06 08:35:17 2024 Received: (at 70779) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 May 2024 12:35:17 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37888 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1s3xYq-0003fb-O7 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 06 May 2024 08:35:16 -0400 Received: from smtp1a.inetd.co.jp ([210.129.88.11]:41358) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1s3xYo-0003fV-53 for 70779@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 06 May 2024 08:35:15 -0400 Received: from localhost (42-144-18-247.rev.home.ne.jp [42.144.18.247]) by smtp1a.inetd.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7F26D60; Mon, 6 May 2024 21:34:46 +0900 (JST) From: Ikumi Keita To: Arash Esbati Subject: Re: bug#70779: [PATCH] Emacs 30 and warning about missing lexical-binding declaration In-reply-to: References: <2789.1714978571@localhost> Comments: In-reply-to Arash Esbati message dated "Mon, 06 May 2024 13:56:47 +0200." X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.8; Emacs 29.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <3799.1714998886.1@localhost> Date: Mon, 06 May 2024 21:34:46 +0900 Message-ID: <3800.1714998886@localhost> X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 70779 Cc: 70779@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Hi Arash, >>>>> Arash Esbati writes: > Thanks for your response; we don't really need them, it was driven by my > habit of having prop-lines justified right. A simple > ;; -*- lexical-binding: t; > looked odd to me. Hmm, it doesn't to me. :-) > What do you think is appropriate? I think these auto files are generally not intended for human eyes. So we wouldn't have to care much about the justtification of the prop line. I vote for simpler form. Best, Ikumi Keita #StandWithUkraine #StopWarInUkraine #Gaza #StopMassiveKilling #CeasefireNOW From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon May 06 11:03:26 2024 Received: (at 70779-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 May 2024 15:03:26 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38531 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1s3zsD-0005kP-UI for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 06 May 2024 11:03:26 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:48634) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1s3zsA-0005kI-L7 for 70779-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 06 May 2024 11:03:24 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1s3zre-0003u9-4R; Mon, 06 May 2024 11:02:50 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-Version:Date:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:To: From; bh=hY+486zs3QiTY5dQuYHKfS3k0p90anTxejZu1tj6NKE=; b=CCzTpeLiSTKa7FFQKJS3 pd3zxqRmInWKR/UnXSTWXZ0shDOsNOoUPF+rPcJ0hVw/Vc6HQw1p2qzIR24R4mK05VG8kdVeAL812 RmGnXKwHxSwO38UC6ui9IDhSnVFyl3MhlyOiT9nuBC6+nCeMLCfcWhxkHjFvvr0uwKQZA7DEZmK0a w6LepBbkxmGwWBH5SfNabos16U0mtfLtzNeEt420tt3S6gq9qdBEZImuJlY9jfKB0LJqTOa6o3+Uo kWxKsRjd3zAe6oKSocq3L0/p7rx9OwzVP0CHVEJ2nMQVG9utAaLDaLm94jY8W7w6BIgWY6+q205UT S4oLHYlb8kbUSQ==; From: Arash Esbati To: Ikumi Keita Subject: Re: bug#70779: [PATCH] Emacs 30 and warning about missing lexical-binding declaration In-Reply-To: <3800.1714998886@localhost> (Ikumi Keita's message of "Mon, 06 May 2024 21:34:46 +0900") References: <2789.1714978571@localhost> <3800.1714998886@localhost> Date: Mon, 06 May 2024 17:02:46 +0200 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 70779-done Cc: 70779-done@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Ikumi Keita writes: > I think these auto files are generally not intended for human eyes. So > we wouldn't have to care much about the justtification of the prop line. > I vote for simpler form. Yes, Sir ;-) I installed the simple version, closing. Best, Arash From unknown Wed Jun 18 23:18:07 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Tue, 04 Jun 2024 11:24:13 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator