GNU bug report logs -
#70774
Fwd: The Artanis pkg issue
Previous Next
Reported by: jbranso <at> dismail.de
Date: Sat, 4 May 2024 19:35:02 UTC
Severity: normal
Done: jbranso <at> dismail.de
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
Full log
View this message in rfc822 format
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Your message dated Sat, 04 May 2024 23:54:14 +0000
with message-id <57d78cbed4f32953bf0a2ee33c9540f53a34b02e <at> dismail.de>
and subject line Close this bug plz
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #70774,
regarding Fwd: The Artanis pkg issue
to be marked as done.
(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs <at> gnu.org.)
--
70774: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=70774
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems
[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]
Apologies for top posting...The below email seemed more like a bug.
Typically guix-devel is for making "large" or complicated changes to guix.
I'm forwarding your message over to bug-guix <at> gnu.org.
Also, do you use Artanis? I've tried to get it to work a few times...
and I can never quite figure it out. My guile web framework is...
guile haunt at the moment. :)
Joshua
-------- Forwarded message -------
From: "Nala Ginrut" <nalaginrut <at> gmail.com>
To: guix-devel <at> gnu.org
Sent: May 4, 2024 at 11:36 AM
Subject: The Artanis pkg issue
Dear Guix folks, I saw the lines in Artanis pkg info:
-----------------------------cut---------------------
(delete-file-recursively "artanis/third-party/json.scm")
(delete-file-recursively "artanis/third-party/json")
(delete-file-recursively "artanis/third-party/redis.scm")
(delete-file-recursively "artanis/third-party/redis")
-----------------------------end----------------------
I understand these lines are aiming to unbundle guile-json and guile-redis, however, recently I've unbundled them in vanilla Artanis. So there's something changed.
You may need to keep third-party/json.scm and third-party/edis.scm in the next release since they are the wrappers, and it's possible to make further abstracts then. In addition, there are necessary renaming operations for compatibility.
Best regards.
[Message part 3 (message/rfc822, inline)]
This bug is done son!
This bug report was last modified 1 year and 74 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.