From unknown Sat Aug 16 21:22:52 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#70774: Fwd: The Artanis pkg issue Resent-From: jbranso@dismail.de Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 04 May 2024 19:35:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: report 70774 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 70774@debbugs.gnu.org, nalaginrut@gmail.com X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-guix@gnu.org, nalaginrut@gmail.com Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.171485126430604 (code B ref -1); Sat, 04 May 2024 19:35:02 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 May 2024 19:34:24 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55352 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1s3L9K-0007xR-64 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 04 May 2024 15:34:24 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:470:142::17]:52216) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1s3L9F-0007xJ-6j for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 04 May 2024 15:34:21 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1s3L8l-0004rf-J8 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 04 May 2024 15:33:47 -0400 Received: from mx1.dismail.de ([78.46.223.134]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1s3L8j-00043e-6T for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 04 May 2024 15:33:47 -0400 Received: from mx1.dismail.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx1.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 364d974d; Sat, 4 May 2024 21:33:40 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=dismail.de; h= mime-version:date:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:from :message-id:subject:to:in-reply-to:references; s=20190914; bh=Bo a+GptUUhA4KJx4hKA1wnTCQ+JMDNlp6ic4N0ncMqs=; b=E7Ha+uqDJpp/oUcdBD RsIbLWdIXF827XCYygzs69Pc9bV7XPUzslrrS6+rDDKp8id9Vh4prKYiAEZXDapA 3FjKFcXAchBA7NTxv3uVo2ZD8WUm6KV8Gblv3QoXiMKkdLSAIOZarzAhHac5F074 sYLp/SXR+UdQT7XlUkMiPKD6ar4NDHuwRrXBinSNUDmOZUDDvNW/IJyy9c/EwRzz w00P8xiOu0hqLuCV7FUquVvP1xz/2lZQfwAezMREOlBBYP8GoKVnXsrXQkHOlnzT 6odX5cOU4Fb9kHUPqxYWXCfr6STCNvgwxXLIQwAf/Va9Tp044tai2+mmlIWC6oy+ VA5Q== Received: from smtp2.dismail.de ( [10.240.26.12]) by mx1.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 30d17927; Sat, 4 May 2024 21:33:40 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp2.dismail.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp2.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 28df126e; Sat, 4 May 2024 21:33:39 +0200 (CEST) Received: by dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 266e5312 (TLSv1.3:TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256:NO); Sat, 4 May 2024 21:33:39 +0200 (CEST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Sat, 04 May 2024 19:33:38 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: jbranso@dismail.de Message-ID: <45adbf514a29eb3c5bd34d22b39766d63469bf19@dismail.de> TLS-Required: No In-Reply-To: References: Received-SPF: pass client-ip=78.46.223.134; envelope-from=jbranso@dismail.de; helo=mx1.dismail.de X-Spam_score_int: -27 X-Spam_score: -2.8 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: 0.9 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.1 (/) Apologies for top posting...The below email seemed more like a bug. Typically guix-devel is for making "large" or complicated changes to guix= . I'm forwarding your message over to bug-guix@gnu.org.=20=20 Also,=20do you use Artanis? I've tried to get it to work a few times... and I can never quite figure it out. My guile web framework is... guile haunt at the moment. :) Joshua=20 --------=20Forwarded message ------- From: "Nala Ginrut" To: guix-devel@gnu.org Sent: May 4, 2024 at 11:36 AM Subject: The Artanis pkg issue Dear Guix folks, I saw the lines in Artanis pkg info: -----------------------------cut--------------------- =C2=A0(delete-file-recursively "artanis/third-party/json.scm") =C2=A0(delete-file-recursively "artanis/third-party/json") =C2=A0(delete-file-recursively "artanis/third-party/redis.scm") =C2=A0(delete-file-recursively "artanis/third-party/redis") -----------------------------end---------------------- I understand these lines are aiming to unbundle guile-json and guile-redi= s, however, recently I've unbundled them in vanilla Artanis. So there's s= omething changed.=C2=A0 You may need to keep third-party/json.scm and third-party/edis.scm in the= next release since they are the wrappers, and it's possible to make furt= her abstracts then. In addition, there are necessary renaming operations = for compatibility. Best regards. From unknown Sat Aug 16 21:22:52 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#70774: Fwd: The Artanis pkg issue Resent-From: jbranso@dismail.de Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 04 May 2024 23:50:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 70774 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 70774@debbugs.gnu.org, nalaginrut@gmail.com X-Debbugs-Original-To: "jbranso--- via Bug reports for GNU Guix" , 70774@debbugs.gnu.org, nalaginrut@gmail.com Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.171486658219338 (code B ref -1); Sat, 04 May 2024 23:50:01 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 May 2024 23:49:42 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56424 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1s3P8Q-00051q-0f for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 04 May 2024 19:49:42 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:470:142::17]:41950) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1s3P8O-00051Y-8L for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 04 May 2024 19:49:40 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1s3P7u-00031W-Jl for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 04 May 2024 19:49:10 -0400 Received: from mx2.dismail.de ([159.69.191.136]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1s3P7s-00045a-Cq for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 04 May 2024 19:49:10 -0400 Received: from mx2.dismail.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx2.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id de9d31ec; Sun, 5 May 2024 01:49:05 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=dismail.de; h= mime-version:date:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:from :message-id:subject:to:in-reply-to:references; s=20190914; bh=Ym JfJeFSusXjypxhYsMky5pDyAoQQPYp/oKi4kgrxc4=; b=eUezhjPDZBf3QmdDbj g8065KBwzAk0wC+R+VcAymie9A3tsBoMn0mWS7fX0FARZC5GCgBJmO1sKmH87MW3 /eKyYevzHI6GuHNqXBp0QOFxpvEOr2paSupNnfEQN0pHa4hmG/Yao9tgYwanLcmt /HxVcYdv4NXDu6UN2t/GxxtSMJFhSK6ivwei6SFRx3l9zKTX0gdZ2X5p9ZwiXF6v 8dRV5yCF6hJAqBaIZFQh/nmui4O5CCWrPljzX0vyQ3ULBISJeQHxfFU5jhDu6ZC2 P8bOt4mWZ+MwPTRRT89PnhtHHZaVsmtcNYDxAkVby5wEMWmRdfCJ0POqA6sPwYVA vIXg== Received: from smtp1.dismail.de ( [10.240.26.11]) by mx2.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 453a2510; Sun, 5 May 2024 01:49:04 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp1.dismail.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp1.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id b4fc8f53; Sun, 5 May 2024 01:49:04 +0200 (CEST) Received: by dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 6bbbbd00 (TLSv1.3:TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256:NO); Sun, 5 May 2024 01:49:03 +0200 (CEST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Sat, 04 May 2024 23:49:03 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: jbranso@dismail.de Message-ID: <8a5ed8073d657731db26afded0929c7d03df8182@dismail.de> TLS-Required: No In-Reply-To: <45adbf514a29eb3c5bd34d22b39766d63469bf19@dismail.de> References: <45adbf514a29eb3c5bd34d22b39766d63469bf19@dismail.de> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=159.69.191.136; envelope-from=jbranso@dismail.de; helo=mx2.dismail.de X-Spam_score_int: -43 X-Spam_score: -4.4 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: 0.9 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.1 (/) May 4, 2024 at 3:33 PM, "jbranso--- via Bug reports for GNU Guix" wrote: >=20 >=20Apologies for top posting...The below email seemed more like a bug. >=20 >=20Typically guix-devel is for making "large" or complicated changes to = guix. >=20 >=20I'm forwarding your message over to bug-guix@gnu.org.=20 >=20 > Also, do you use Artanis? I've tried to get it to work a few times... >=20 >=20and I can never quite figure it out. My guile web framework is... >=20 >=20guile haunt at the moment. :) >=20 >=20Joshua=20 Per=20this message, it looks like this bug is done! https://mail.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2024-05/msg00033.html I'm closing this bug. Joshua >=20 >=20-------- Forwarded message ------- >=20 >=20From: "Nala Ginrut" >=20 >=20To: guix-devel@gnu.org >=20 >=20Sent: May 4, 2024 at 11:36 AM >=20 >=20Subject: The Artanis pkg issue >=20 >=20Dear Guix folks, I saw the lines in Artanis pkg info: >=20 >=20-----------------------------cut--------------------- >=20 >=20=C2=A0(delete-file-recursively "artanis/third-party/json.scm") >=20 >=20=C2=A0(delete-file-recursively "artanis/third-party/json") >=20 >=20=C2=A0(delete-file-recursively "artanis/third-party/redis.scm") >=20 >=20=C2=A0(delete-file-recursively "artanis/third-party/redis") >=20 >=20-----------------------------end---------------------- >=20 >=20I understand these lines are aiming to unbundle guile-json and guile-= redis, however, recently I've unbundled them in vanilla Artanis. So there= 's something changed.=C2=A0 >=20 >=20You may need to keep third-party/json.scm and third-party/edis.scm in= the next release since they are the wrappers, and it's possible to make = further abstracts then. In addition, there are necessary renaming operati= ons for compatibility. >=20 >=20Best regards. > From unknown Sat Aug 16 21:22:52 2025 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.505 (Entity 5.505) X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org From: help-debbugs@gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System) To: jbranso@dismail.de Subject: bug#70774: closed (Close this bug plz) Message-ID: References: <57d78cbed4f32953bf0a2ee33c9540f53a34b02e@dismail.de> <45adbf514a29eb3c5bd34d22b39766d63469bf19@dismail.de> X-Gnu-PR-Message: they-closed 70774 X-Gnu-PR-Package: guix Reply-To: 70774@debbugs.gnu.org Date: Sat, 04 May 2024 23:55:02 +0000 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1714866902-19517-1" This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1714866902-19517-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Your bug report #70774: Fwd: The Artanis pkg issue which was filed against the guix package, has been closed. The explanation is attached below, along with your original report. If you require more details, please reply to 70774@debbugs.gnu.org. --=20 70774: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D70774 GNU Bug Tracking System Contact help-debbugs@gnu.org with problems ------------=_1714866902-19517-1 Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received: (at 70774-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 May 2024 23:54:50 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56448 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1s3PDN-00054Y-Qo for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 04 May 2024 19:54:50 -0400 Received: from mx1.dismail.de ([78.46.223.134]:38097) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1s3PDJ-00054P-9w for 70774-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 04 May 2024 19:54:48 -0400 Received: from mx1.dismail.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx1.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 62a29f0d for <70774-done@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 5 May 2024 01:54:16 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=dismail.de; h= mime-version:date:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:from :message-id:subject:to; s=20190914; bh=8NEDYoi2EJZsD/VhGvZ5pipiA 8qAzcJ/U8i2oMMzR54=; b=MlCst+OWa7ZyX98F6UPZhVP7e2QHlVBJ1EYdrngL5 qYNCgOcx17bXqOYgqijiTpTGpITIPzk9GI7v/XX4CiNUKP5JOePRwj7qetAqh+VO WSgSMT9ycjJuNDIdtsNi7cdGs/TxcOsZ+mUBeA8yRM4smqbtan0xRHj2833wqguE k/0H9f2H+z+7Fwtdwb2W2m/Gz1u3xjFRqUgIPKBzCcNWiCRup7AjAQel/jeehdD6 kGeOv9rXcGoYmjN2eKC8G1onQZEcwLPncXUCwmUMcsGDwwaadQhbF2d7HZQcwGN0 K1i6if3bO+OLtJxvZAmuM2iQhuAbENT8KSFv/YifszBYQ== Received: from smtp2.dismail.de ( [10.240.26.12]) by mx1.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 3ff02b26 for <70774-done@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 5 May 2024 01:54:15 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp2.dismail.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp2.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 6f986fc0 for <70774-done@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 5 May 2024 01:54:15 +0200 (CEST) Received: by dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 127b54aa (TLSv1.3:TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256:NO) for <70774-done@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 5 May 2024 01:54:15 +0200 (CEST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Sat, 04 May 2024 23:54:14 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: jbranso@dismail.de Message-ID: <57d78cbed4f32953bf0a2ee33c9540f53a34b02e@dismail.de> TLS-Required: No Subject: Close this bug plz To: 70774-done@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 70774-done X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) This bug is done son! ------------=_1714866902-19517-1 Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 May 2024 19:34:24 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55352 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1s3L9K-0007xR-64 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 04 May 2024 15:34:24 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:470:142::17]:52216) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1s3L9F-0007xJ-6j for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 04 May 2024 15:34:21 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1s3L8l-0004rf-J8 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 04 May 2024 15:33:47 -0400 Received: from mx1.dismail.de ([78.46.223.134]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1s3L8j-00043e-6T for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 04 May 2024 15:33:47 -0400 Received: from mx1.dismail.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx1.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 364d974d; Sat, 4 May 2024 21:33:40 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=dismail.de; h= mime-version:date:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:from :message-id:subject:to:in-reply-to:references; s=20190914; bh=Bo a+GptUUhA4KJx4hKA1wnTCQ+JMDNlp6ic4N0ncMqs=; b=E7Ha+uqDJpp/oUcdBD RsIbLWdIXF827XCYygzs69Pc9bV7XPUzslrrS6+rDDKp8id9Vh4prKYiAEZXDapA 3FjKFcXAchBA7NTxv3uVo2ZD8WUm6KV8Gblv3QoXiMKkdLSAIOZarzAhHac5F074 sYLp/SXR+UdQT7XlUkMiPKD6ar4NDHuwRrXBinSNUDmOZUDDvNW/IJyy9c/EwRzz w00P8xiOu0hqLuCV7FUquVvP1xz/2lZQfwAezMREOlBBYP8GoKVnXsrXQkHOlnzT 6odX5cOU4Fb9kHUPqxYWXCfr6STCNvgwxXLIQwAf/Va9Tp044tai2+mmlIWC6oy+ VA5Q== Received: from smtp2.dismail.de ( [10.240.26.12]) by mx1.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 30d17927; Sat, 4 May 2024 21:33:40 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp2.dismail.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp2.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 28df126e; Sat, 4 May 2024 21:33:39 +0200 (CEST) Received: by dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 266e5312 (TLSv1.3:TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256:NO); Sat, 4 May 2024 21:33:39 +0200 (CEST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Sat, 04 May 2024 19:33:38 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: jbranso@dismail.de Message-ID: <45adbf514a29eb3c5bd34d22b39766d63469bf19@dismail.de> TLS-Required: No Subject: Fwd: The Artanis pkg issue To: bug-guix@gnu.org, nalaginrut@gmail.com In-Reply-To: References: Received-SPF: pass client-ip=78.46.223.134; envelope-from=jbranso@dismail.de; helo=mx1.dismail.de X-Spam_score_int: -27 X-Spam_score: -2.8 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: 0.9 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.1 (/) Apologies for top posting...The below email seemed more like a bug. Typically guix-devel is for making "large" or complicated changes to guix= . I'm forwarding your message over to bug-guix@gnu.org.=20=20 Also,=20do you use Artanis? I've tried to get it to work a few times... and I can never quite figure it out. My guile web framework is... guile haunt at the moment. :) Joshua=20 --------=20Forwarded message ------- From: "Nala Ginrut" To: guix-devel@gnu.org Sent: May 4, 2024 at 11:36 AM Subject: The Artanis pkg issue Dear Guix folks, I saw the lines in Artanis pkg info: -----------------------------cut--------------------- =C2=A0(delete-file-recursively "artanis/third-party/json.scm") =C2=A0(delete-file-recursively "artanis/third-party/json") =C2=A0(delete-file-recursively "artanis/third-party/redis.scm") =C2=A0(delete-file-recursively "artanis/third-party/redis") -----------------------------end---------------------- I understand these lines are aiming to unbundle guile-json and guile-redi= s, however, recently I've unbundled them in vanilla Artanis. So there's s= omething changed.=C2=A0 You may need to keep third-party/json.scm and third-party/edis.scm in the= next release since they are the wrappers, and it's possible to make furt= her abstracts then. In addition, there are necessary renaming operations = for compatibility. Best regards. ------------=_1714866902-19517-1-- From unknown Sat Aug 16 21:22:52 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#70774: The Artanis pkg issue Resent-From: Nala Ginrut Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 05 May 2024 12:35:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 70774 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Joshua Branson Cc: 70774@debbugs.gnu.org X-Debbugs-Original-Cc: bug-guix@gnu.org Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.171491245217748 (code B ref -1); Sun, 05 May 2024 12:35:01 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 May 2024 12:34:12 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59488 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1s3b4G-0004cC-B7 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 05 May 2024 08:34:12 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:470:142::17]:59934) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1s3b4A-0004bl-89 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 05 May 2024 08:34:10 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1s3b3g-0007FC-SZ for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 05 May 2024 08:33:36 -0400 Received: from mail-pj1-x1036.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::1036]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1s3b3f-0001Td-7B for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 05 May 2024 08:33:36 -0400 Received: by mail-pj1-x1036.google.com with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-2b4952a1b51so796454a91.0 for ; Sun, 05 May 2024 05:33:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1714912414; x=1715517214; darn=gnu.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=+kG7ZMaS6OiHg7R0E9pKFvUk7COnTqaTlyiwEVpDvKM=; b=DWPv2vHyfnvkLOBPr4Jk85Wl9dhLPqRXP2Qv0kiErsQ+0POGtP3ogkOWimUntJsJ4q Bkn44KeBVKj4/FL61ryJqI9jQwOy4s3li1blcvLxSiSMtU/mebOpBjWHNoCZGMX+i5hx 3H86CORH6KDmT98hev/2dMTxzQDxi/XppQfY8S45pce351nab6qW8ZHz0Mqr5RVToB0U jf9RAlkDmOjE5rU3zVFnbUvC8pvHvVnoDyFuOrMZiwuT8sFKLP4ElZa7bw2GfKb7BQmk Di7y7lZ2X2OvG4lrvpoqn9UWoIMb7oSOM5fbqWxgJAjd3oznwid6cNw/YTF7V7wwZDrG aipQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1714912414; x=1715517214; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=+kG7ZMaS6OiHg7R0E9pKFvUk7COnTqaTlyiwEVpDvKM=; b=srFflBGDZs5R0paAp2sG1KRzHNSDqBvZLJOIQEC2LUJVffD7ftCRXSRKiQ9BgdcoNY AFL91YAqm0qUUvB5s5DWCEz6IlI7Al++SaFZKVfoSllIjEPowpX6EOqBNNPN98ljzT4z XLjef9PxcoyX6dZbapcQY4SZxM4oocwl0bhV2fqK27k4QTKNc+awMCp2xYEOPqwyNk7s QcepKr3CRH4QeicsTSDx8LdNFE95lIs64BUjNMKXf7lURUvHz3OtfdOpCbJ8B2xpOge/ GFq0mNRFRTWTYVStpah12E0hMELnZe+XKRVlQDa7hnObIgUv4Q3ODr2fiPYdpxBxD6z5 RQvw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YyCwKOhlt9c8pzZoJ6Wu56+8wRE8Rh8Z04SAth9ZVl/k3uymagI J8ynTGa4LQjdWYn/IkKwIB701TXLjJLOyTETCeFEbgZy7xRv44y4sIhdqYIgT06sK/4o6lNcnwr RpMb/726gfvZKA01mOZ2AYbrFhNVMeg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFt/iQkETBi8VRpaWci8P8blmxHC5MCqaUdMT+DDy79ZDcFHB4VULGc1v2IB3W3tQwQCOiV6lQzjBBd2i1WIw0= X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:fa08:b0:2b2:6975:bf49 with SMTP id cm8-20020a17090afa0800b002b26975bf49mr7051294pjb.6.1714912413769; Sun, 05 May 2024 05:33:33 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <45adbf514a29eb3c5bd34d22b39766d63469bf19@dismail.de> In-Reply-To: <45adbf514a29eb3c5bd34d22b39766d63469bf19@dismail.de> From: Nala Ginrut Date: Sun, 5 May 2024 21:33:22 +0900 Message-ID: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000003e6d660617b42903" Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::1036; envelope-from=nalaginrut@gmail.com; helo=mail-pj1-x1036.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) --0000000000003e6d660617b42903 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Hi Joshua! Have you tried the latest 0.6? Can it work for you? For now, I only tested in Ubuntu 24.04. On Sun, May 5, 2024, 04:33 wrote: > Apologies for top posting...The below email seemed more like a bug. > > Typically guix-devel is for making "large" or complicated changes to guix. > > I'm forwarding your message over to bug-guix@gnu.org. > > Also, do you use Artanis? I've tried to get it to work a few times... > and I can never quite figure it out. My guile web framework is... > guile haunt at the moment. :) > > Joshua > > > -------- Forwarded message ------- > > > > From: "Nala Ginrut" > > > To: guix-devel@gnu.org > > > Sent: May 4, 2024 at 11:36 AM > > > Subject: The Artanis pkg issue > > > > Dear Guix folks, I saw the lines in Artanis pkg info: > > -----------------------------cut--------------------- > > (delete-file-recursively "artanis/third-party/json.scm") > > > (delete-file-recursively "artanis/third-party/json") > > > (delete-file-recursively "artanis/third-party/redis.scm") > > > (delete-file-recursively "artanis/third-party/redis") > > -----------------------------end---------------------- > > > I understand these lines are aiming to unbundle guile-json and > guile-redis, however, recently I've unbundled them in vanilla Artanis. So > there's something changed. > > > You may need to keep third-party/json.scm and third-party/edis.scm in the > next release since they are the wrappers, and it's possible to make further > abstracts then. In addition, there are necessary renaming operations for > compatibility. > > > Best regards. > --0000000000003e6d660617b42903 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi Joshua!
Have you tried the latest 0.6= ?
Can it work for you?
For no= w, I only tested in Ubuntu 24.04.

On Sun, = May 5, 2024, 04:33 <jbranso@disma= il.de> wrote:
Apologies for = top posting...The below email seemed more like a bug.

Typically guix-devel is for making "large" or complicated changes= to guix.

I'm forwarding your message over to bug-guix@gnu.org.=C2=A0

Also, do you use Artanis?=C2=A0 I've tried to get it to work a few time= s...
and I can never quite figure it out.=C2=A0 My guile web framework is...
guile haunt at the moment.=C2=A0 :)

Joshua


-------- Forwarded message -------



From: "Nala Ginrut" <nalaginrut@gmail.com>


To: guix-devel@gnu.org


Sent: May 4, 2024 at 11:36 AM


Subject: The Artanis pkg issue



Dear Guix folks, I saw the lines in Artanis pkg info:

-----------------------------cut---------------------

=C2=A0(delete-file-recursively "artanis/third-party/json.scm")

=C2=A0(delete-file-recursively "artanis/third-party/json")


=C2=A0(delete-file-recursively "artanis/third-party/redis.scm")

=C2=A0(delete-file-recursively "artanis/third-party/redis")

-----------------------------end----------------------


I understand these lines are aiming to unbundle guile-json and guile-redis,= however, recently I've unbundled them in vanilla Artanis. So there'= ;s something changed.=C2=A0


You may need to keep third-party/json.scm and third-party/edis.scm in the n= ext release since they are the wrappers, and it's possible to make furt= her abstracts then. In addition, there are necessary renaming operations fo= r compatibility.


Best regards.
--0000000000003e6d660617b42903--