From unknown Fri Aug 15 04:08:06 2025 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.509 (Entity 5.509) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 From: bug#70764 <70764@debbugs.gnu.org> To: bug#70764 <70764@debbugs.gnu.org> Subject: Status: 29.1; M-x gdb: don't ask me about debuginfod server if debuginfod is not in context Reply-To: bug#70764 <70764@debbugs.gnu.org> Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2025 11:08:06 +0000 retitle 70764 29.1; M-x gdb: don't ask me about debuginfod server if debugi= nfod is not in context reassign 70764 emacs submitter 70764 Rolf Ade severity 70764 normal thanks From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri May 03 22:01:11 2024 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 May 2024 02:01:11 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50457 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1s34i7-0000HW-Eg for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 03 May 2024 22:01:11 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:470:142::17]:34192) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1s34i3-0000Gw-4E for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 03 May 2024 22:01:10 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1s34hU-0004lK-IW for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 03 May 2024 22:00:34 -0400 Received: from mail.nepustil.net ([2001:14f8:1:1::8]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1s34hR-0005SS-2P for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 03 May 2024 22:00:31 -0400 Received: from p5b317896.dip0.t-ipconnect.de ([91.49.120.150]:37910 helo=pointsman2) by mail.nepustil.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.3) tls TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.95 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1s34eh-00014V-PG; Sat, 04 May 2024 04:00:20 +0200 From: Rolf Ade To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Subject: 29.1; M-x gdb: don't ask me about debuginfod server if debuginfod is not in context Date: Sat, 04 May 2024 04:00:20 +0200 Message-ID: <87jzkatjyj.fsf@pointsman.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2001:14f8:1:1::8; envelope-from=rolf@pointsman.de; helo=mail.nepustil.net X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) With 29.1 as well as with trunk(both tested with -Q) if I call M-x gdb I get asked: "Enable querying debuginfod servers for this session? (y or n)" Even if I answer with "n" I get the message: "No symbol \"debuginfod\" in current context." This can't be right. Declining to use a feature should not be answered with a message that it would not be available anyways (what the message seem to tell me). Digging around a bit it turns out there is a variable to customise the behaviour here: gdb-debuginfod-enable-setting. Its default value is 'ask. >From a user perspective it only make sense to be ask about wanting something if this something is avaliable. If it is about the advertising aspect then why not more clear don't ask questions and instead write a message like: "You cannot use debuginfod servers. Consider using this marvelous feature". rolf From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat May 04 03:21:14 2024 Received: (at 70764) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 May 2024 07:21:14 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51730 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1s39hq-0006wr-2n for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 04 May 2024 03:21:14 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:49998) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1s39hm-0006wj-Vj for 70764@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 04 May 2024 03:21:13 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1s39hJ-0003qM-4s; Sat, 04 May 2024 03:20:41 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=ECGhA8310dWzTgups5pJXFGhmdGLkQfco2j5d3nWa2I=; b=BoiBkbE4UOpF wmy0rJRV3eeWxFPHo2BpPgJe7HmB3+4aqb6C2y1frPSVD6Di2tn4ezsO/5WvViNXqRWn5qy911Ix9 7uOenq9TPV3V+fNNKUeESja+OclI7YzKOXoI89U2rhrw5k0rT+yEH13KyBi/KIL7IyhqMDLtqve/y n3HMAcG2XJPJs4A82lcOK/dtjx7UCO7vPrc/eRhvqx/HkHsoed8IAGDDMwxMMxdiWmSYVJ8/K3bKS Q+AxeLkswX7UA5fazV1rb/qVU0dvLEN1Dq8cS292QlIgnqV9/g++rVyRoR5ESc5B6Me7nTZpV52o9 F4qg38v17/WtT6C3dO+vSw==; Date: Sat, 04 May 2024 10:20:37 +0300 Message-Id: <86v83ugi0q.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: Rolf Ade In-Reply-To: <87jzkatjyj.fsf@pointsman.de> (message from Rolf Ade on Sat, 04 May 2024 04:00:20 +0200) Subject: Re: bug#70764: 29.1; M-x gdb: don't ask me about debuginfod server if debuginfod is not in context References: <87jzkatjyj.fsf@pointsman.de> X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 70764 Cc: 70764@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) > From: Rolf Ade > Date: Sat, 04 May 2024 04:00:20 +0200 > > > With 29.1 as well as with trunk(both tested with -Q) if I call M-x gdb I > get asked: > > "Enable querying debuginfod servers for this session? (y or n)" > > Even if I answer with "n" I get the message: > > "No symbol \"debuginfod\" in current context." I think this means your GDB is too old and doesn't support debug info downloading, or was built without that support. We don't know how to know in advance that this is not supported, thus the user option that you can customize to avoid these questions if your GDB cannot use debuginfod. What OS are you using GDB on, and what is your GDB version, please? > If it is about the advertising aspect then why not more clear don't ask > questions and instead write a message like: "You cannot use debuginfod > servers. Consider using this marvelous feature". It isn't about advertising. The question is real (and important when the feature is supported). From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat May 04 09:33:21 2024 Received: (at 70764) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 May 2024 13:33:21 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53742 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1s3FVw-0000RX-MJ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 04 May 2024 09:33:21 -0400 Received: from mail.nepustil.net ([2001:14f8:1:1::8]:20964) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1s3FVr-0000RP-Pd for 70764@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 04 May 2024 09:33:19 -0400 Received: from p5b317896.dip0.t-ipconnect.de ([91.49.120.150]:59422 helo=[192.168.178.42]) by mail.nepustil.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.3) tls TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (Exim 4.95 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1s3FSq-000A6m-QI for 70764@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 04 May 2024 15:32:49 +0200 Message-ID: <5df842de-5eaf-48f6-aacf-adf1085188d4@pointsman.de> Date: Sat, 4 May 2024 15:32:51 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: bug#70764: 29.1; M-x gdb: don't ask me about debuginfod server if debuginfod is not in context To: 70764@debbugs.gnu.org References: <87jzkatjyj.fsf@pointsman.de> <86v83ugi0q.fsf@gnu.org> From: Rolf Ade Content-Language: de-CH In-Reply-To: <86v83ugi0q.fsf@gnu.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 70764 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Am 04.05.24 um 09:20 schrieb Eli Zaretskii: >> From: Rolf Ade >> Date: Sat, 04 May 2024 04:00:20 +0200 >> >> >> With 29.1 as well as with trunk(both tested with -Q) if I call M-x gdb I >> get asked: >> >> "Enable querying debuginfod servers for this session? (y or n)" >> >> Even if I answer with "n" I get the message: >> >> "No symbol \"debuginfod\" in current context." > > I think this means your GDB is too old and doesn't support debug info > downloading, or was built without that support. We don't know how to > know in advance that this is not supported, thus the user option that > you can customize to avoid these questions if your GDB cannot use > debuginfod. > > What OS are you using GDB on, and what is your GDB version, please? > >> If it is about the advertising aspect then why not more clear don't ask >> questions and instead write a message like: "You cannot use debuginfod >> servers. Consider using this marvelous feature". > > It isn't about advertising. The question is real (and important when > the feature is supported). From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat May 04 09:34:09 2024 Received: (at 70764) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 May 2024 13:34:09 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53749 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1s3FWj-0000SB-4S for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 04 May 2024 09:34:09 -0400 Received: from mail.nepustil.net ([2001:14f8:1:1::8]:23289) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1s3FWh-0000S5-5q for 70764@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 04 May 2024 09:34:07 -0400 Received: from p5b317896.dip0.t-ipconnect.de ([91.49.120.150]:40588 helo=[192.168.178.42]) by mail.nepustil.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.3) tls TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (Exim 4.95 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1s3FTg-000A7G-3e for 70764@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 04 May 2024 15:33:41 +0200 Message-ID: <69d9310e-e89e-4f4b-8fd1-5ad6f4cb1807@pointsman.de> Date: Sat, 4 May 2024 15:33:42 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird From: Rolf Ade Subject: Re: bug#70764: 29.1; M-x gdb: don't ask me about debuginfod server if debuginfod is not in context To: 70764@debbugs.gnu.org References: <87jzkatjyj.fsf@pointsman.de> <86v83ugi0q.fsf@gnu.org> Content-Language: de-CH In-Reply-To: <86v83ugi0q.fsf@gnu.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 70764 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Am 04.05.24 um 09:20 schrieb Eli Zaretskii: >> From: Rolf Ade >> Date: Sat, 04 May 2024 04:00:20 +0200 >> >> >> With 29.1 as well as with trunk(both tested with -Q) if I call M-x gdb I >> get asked: >> >> "Enable querying debuginfod servers for this session? (y or n)" >> >> Even if I answer with "n" I get the message: >> >> "No symbol \"debuginfod\" in current context." > > I think this means your GDB is too old and doesn't support debug info > downloading, or was built without that support. We don't know how to > know in advance that this is not supported, thus the user option that > you can customize to avoid these questions if your GDB cannot use > debuginfod. I don't know if my gdb support debug info downloading (see exact version info below) but if I answer the question with "n" - I don't want to enable this - I wonder why I'm (only mildly, of course) bothered with a not very helpful error message. > What OS are you using GDB on, and what is your GDB version, please? This is basically a GNU/linux debian 11.9 (so, not that old). More specifically, uname -a: Linux pointsman2 5.10.0-28-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 5.10.209-2 (2024-01-31) x86_64 GNU/Linux gdb --version (it's the version installed by the debian package management system): GNU gdb (Debian 10.1-1.7) 10.1.90.20210103-git From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat May 04 10:12:46 2024 Received: (at 70764) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 May 2024 14:12:46 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53929 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1s3G86-0001E9-De for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 04 May 2024 10:12:46 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:43628) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1s3G83-0001E1-JU for 70764@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 04 May 2024 10:12:44 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1s3G7Z-0000CN-Ry; Sat, 04 May 2024 10:12:13 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=eBaiSnF4FY5UNA93wXFgPHwjE+4BLX9t3itFlLEfNJY=; b=b1joBeUUfJ0I X4vLHPydDxYGmuXTY0uRatMewJ2B8rAuzaW2TYgV+qAWYtz7EUIr1jS5LOFACN/5ni6ZZuJexdsdx IR0ppEqjwS3SYWoBPBQB+hA0SVNd0ftmnHsxiu+W4Y6Vr69ZhDZAIq0rkTyO/PU9HM+nCXoAD2VnC Kp/TqLdn1M/MXMDeZ0OqUS507+SVIkts5xYymjPXLaYaf3/BLLC2MM+v6x9Ckq8yvOVIyrtoBZNdP LWHQ6X7AA+f/qigOqL8kUzCkNB/A5voyeebpPtxrC2eNGeMmBMZ6YekxTt9sv/CxJ4O3vSoTVmLVL v8BERUU1BBL8v7Mbg8amEw==; Date: Sat, 04 May 2024 17:11:52 +0300 Message-Id: <86jzk9fyzb.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: Rolf Ade In-Reply-To: <54b3a581-8e00-4bf1-9051-5b826cd9c306@pointsman.de> (message from Rolf Ade on Sat, 4 May 2024 15:32:27 +0200) Subject: Re: bug#70764: 29.1; M-x gdb: don't ask me about debuginfod server if debuginfod is not in context References: <87jzkatjyj.fsf@pointsman.de> <86v83ugi0q.fsf@gnu.org> <54b3a581-8e00-4bf1-9051-5b826cd9c306@pointsman.de> X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 70764 Cc: 70764@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) > Date: Sat, 4 May 2024 15:32:27 +0200 > From: Rolf Ade > > >> Even if I answer with "n" I get the message: > >> > >> "No symbol \"debuginfod\" in current context." > > > > I think this means your GDB is too old and doesn't support debug info > > downloading, or was built without that support. We don't know how to > > know in advance that this is not supported, thus the user option that > > you can customize to avoid these questions if your GDB cannot use > > debuginfod. > > I don't know if my gdb support debug info downloading (see exact version info > below) but if I answer the question with "n" - I don't want to enable this - I > wonder why I'm (only mildly, of course) bothered with a not very helpful error > message. I don't know. AFAIR, it was not supposed to happen in Emacs 29.1 and later. > > What OS are you using GDB on, and what is your GDB version, please? > > This is basically a GNU/linux debian 11.9 (so, not that old). More specifically, > uname -a: > > Linux pointsman2 5.10.0-28-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 5.10.209-2 (2024-01-31) x86_64 > GNU/Linux > > gdb --version (it's the version installed by the debian package management system): > > GNU gdb (Debian 10.1-1.7) 10.1.90.20210103-git Strange. GDB 10.1 was the version where debuginfod support was added. What does the shell command below show? $ gdb --config | fgrep debuginfod From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat May 04 10:24:01 2024 Received: (at 70764) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 May 2024 14:24:01 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53984 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1s3GIy-0001Ln-9u for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 04 May 2024 10:24:01 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:48882) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1s3GIs-0001Ld-Vm for 70764@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 04 May 2024 10:23:58 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1s3GIP-0002CY-1V; Sat, 04 May 2024 10:23:25 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=sQNSQ+AT124JT1bl/XnFCpbBRyzTYKHJKF7kEDLZq7U=; b=ZGj7awtrfK2h nOFEGU2d6MbGOVXzLeyc3uVfrCToWe2VC0cKnTbtY7stvfHO7tu7k1xcmqjhTFU4DKqbeaMOdtEFK 8t2SGZXXU48OYw/vyWrmzGv9uV/2Pp9DjJ3cJfrwOvdA9cCC9HSfnIDPHuQ9FvLTcm0vOg9cW15ZE kf8JlxO9TpmOvx4A3ZZXzBDwlxlDTzu1Pz+Qj61TurNKS8h95wSxceO9kufCSbbFGnGYuyBucEQlf ryT/K6IlPF98dIa/KfgsonDYU1TD4XRuIlIi7VH78cMplmPH0Lepm1eOw6MhPK9wAslkrytZvw+qq 7SeEurIPeotCazqisTwZsQ==; Date: Sat, 04 May 2024 17:23:14 +0300 Message-Id: <86ikztfygd.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: rolf@pointsman.de In-Reply-To: <86jzk9fyzb.fsf@gnu.org> (message from Eli Zaretskii on Sat, 04 May 2024 17:11:52 +0300) Subject: Re: bug#70764: 29.1; M-x gdb: don't ask me about debuginfod server if debuginfod is not in context References: <87jzkatjyj.fsf@pointsman.de> <86v83ugi0q.fsf@gnu.org> <54b3a581-8e00-4bf1-9051-5b826cd9c306@pointsman.de> <86jzk9fyzb.fsf@gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 70764 Cc: 70764@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) > Cc: 70764@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Sat, 04 May 2024 17:11:52 +0300 > From: Eli Zaretskii > > > Date: Sat, 4 May 2024 15:32:27 +0200 > > From: Rolf Ade > > > > I don't know if my gdb support debug info downloading (see exact version info > > below) but if I answer the question with "n" - I don't want to enable this - I > > wonder why I'm (only mildly, of course) bothered with a not very helpful error > > message. > > I don't know. AFAIR, it was not supposed to happen in Emacs 29.1 and > later. FWIW, I just tried "M-x gdb" in Emacs 29.1, and didn't see any "No symbol" messages after answering "n" to the debuginfod question. My GDB on that system is version 12.1, though, and it was compiled with debuginfod support. So maybe that's the reason. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat May 04 11:42:52 2024 Received: (at 70764) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 May 2024 15:42:52 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54332 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1s3HXH-0002CM-NP for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 04 May 2024 11:42:51 -0400 Received: from mail.nepustil.net ([2001:14f8:1:1::8]:44977) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1s3HXD-0002CE-Un for 70764@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 04 May 2024 11:42:50 -0400 Received: from p5b317896.dip0.t-ipconnect.de ([91.49.120.150]:49332 helo=[192.168.178.42]) by mail.nepustil.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.3) tls TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (Exim 4.95 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1s3HUA-000Bhq-1c; Sat, 04 May 2024 17:42:18 +0200 Message-ID: <1ef03828-d29d-4157-b40a-f88e9f13d909@pointsman.de> Date: Sat, 4 May 2024 17:42:20 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: bug#70764: 29.1; M-x gdb: don't ask me about debuginfod server if debuginfod is not in context To: Eli Zaretskii References: <87jzkatjyj.fsf@pointsman.de> <86v83ugi0q.fsf@gnu.org> <54b3a581-8e00-4bf1-9051-5b826cd9c306@pointsman.de> <86jzk9fyzb.fsf@gnu.org> Content-Language: de-CH From: Rolf Ade In-Reply-To: <86jzk9fyzb.fsf@gnu.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 70764 Cc: 70764@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Am 04.05.24 um 16:11 schrieb Eli Zaretskii: >> Date: Sat, 4 May 2024 15:32:27 +0200 >> From: Rolf Ade >> >>>> Even if I answer with "n" I get the message: >>>> >>>> "No symbol \"debuginfod\" in current context." >>> [...] >>> What OS are you using GDB on, and what is your GDB version, please? >> >> This is basically a GNU/linux debian 11.9 (so, not that old). More specifically, >> uname -a: >> >> Linux pointsman2 5.10.0-28-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 5.10.209-2 (2024-01-31) x86_64 >> GNU/Linux >> >> gdb --version (it's the version installed by the debian package management system): >> >> GNU gdb (Debian 10.1-1.7) 10.1.90.20210103-git > > Strange. GDB 10.1 was the version where debuginfod support was added. > What does the shell command below show? > > $ gdb --config | fgrep debuginfod This returns --with-debuginfod From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat May 04 11:54:38 2024 Received: (at 70764) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 May 2024 15:54:38 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54382 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1s3Hig-0002Ki-An for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 04 May 2024 11:54:38 -0400 Received: from mail.nepustil.net ([2001:14f8:1:1::8]:20787) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1s3Hid-0002KU-Gx for 70764@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 04 May 2024 11:54:36 -0400 Received: from p5b317896.dip0.t-ipconnect.de ([91.49.120.150]:45446 helo=[192.168.178.42]) by mail.nepustil.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.3) tls TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (Exim 4.95 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1s3Hfb-000Bo5-75; Sat, 04 May 2024 17:54:08 +0200 Message-ID: Date: Sat, 4 May 2024 17:54:10 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: bug#70764: 29.1; M-x gdb: don't ask me about debuginfod server if debuginfod is not in context To: Eli Zaretskii References: <87jzkatjyj.fsf@pointsman.de> <86v83ugi0q.fsf@gnu.org> <54b3a581-8e00-4bf1-9051-5b826cd9c306@pointsman.de> <86jzk9fyzb.fsf@gnu.org> <86ikztfygd.fsf@gnu.org> Content-Language: de-CH From: Rolf Ade In-Reply-To: <86ikztfygd.fsf@gnu.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 70764 Cc: 70764@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Am 04.05.24 um 16:23 schrieb Eli Zaretskii: >> Cc: 70764@debbugs.gnu.org >> Date: Sat, 04 May 2024 17:11:52 +0300 >> From: Eli Zaretskii >> >>> Date: Sat, 4 May 2024 15:32:27 +0200 >>> From: Rolf Ade >>> >>> I don't know if my gdb support debug info downloading (see exact version info >>> below) but if I answer the question with "n" - I don't want to enable this - I >>> wonder why I'm (only mildly, of course) bothered with a not very helpful error >>> message. >> >> I don't know. AFAIR, it was not supposed to happen in Emacs 29.1 and >> later. > > FWIW, I just tried "M-x gdb" in Emacs 29.1, and didn't see any "No > symbol" messages after answering "n" to the debuginfod question. As reported in the original bug report I tried this also with current trunk (and -Q) and the same gdb (10.1) and saw the same message: "No symbol \"debuginfod\" in current context." > My GDB on that system is version 12.1, though, and it was compiled > with debuginfod support. So maybe that's the reason. The still officially supported debian 11 (Bullseye) comes with gdb 10.1 I use, see: https://packages.debian.org/bullseye/gdb From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat May 04 12:13:11 2024 Received: (at 70764) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 May 2024 16:13:11 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54454 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1s3I0d-0002XG-9p for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 04 May 2024 12:13:11 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:48058) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1s3I0Z-0002X8-N1 for 70764@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 04 May 2024 12:13:10 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1s3I06-0003WB-2h; Sat, 04 May 2024 12:12:38 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=UnxfJRdd6Rj1iXpQbXxGkkkrAiDIEQUb+yeELLURgV0=; b=afvbfYMf9Gud w2SpFDz+HBDUJkfZ5+AKcyDmUeDcaqgpaXIB+7H7gaLicBsVJRMTDCHGiJDYSDM2QFkC6DEZ+A267 l7Dnn06RkQOV/xXLVvccHpLlD3fGpJ1eBqROZzWMgglDlnhwOaR6uUGJJlFtLDEX0mBGQbWUM+Onz hadZ2ka4rmwWvOJrGo8JTrNhNY37VXX7zVzU2M6ZDfAPpUJ+WIjPRxv0DnCDQmUewe4UxPrXUzzcT X1O/4iwREqhTt7lfjfPekiFSsOKNl2o+mSIo8J4wpgqSsX80jlMeXPhBm8Q5Q9Zz1y3XovnW7fubT kM1zWwhXOniYl/vyXpw9nQ==; Date: Sat, 04 May 2024 19:12:33 +0300 Message-Id: <86fruxfte6.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: Rolf Ade In-Reply-To: <1ef03828-d29d-4157-b40a-f88e9f13d909@pointsman.de> (message from Rolf Ade on Sat, 4 May 2024 17:42:20 +0200) Subject: Re: bug#70764: 29.1; M-x gdb: don't ask me about debuginfod server if debuginfod is not in context References: <87jzkatjyj.fsf@pointsman.de> <86v83ugi0q.fsf@gnu.org> <54b3a581-8e00-4bf1-9051-5b826cd9c306@pointsman.de> <86jzk9fyzb.fsf@gnu.org> <1ef03828-d29d-4157-b40a-f88e9f13d909@pointsman.de> X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 70764 Cc: 70764@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) > Date: Sat, 4 May 2024 17:42:20 +0200 > Cc: 70764@debbugs.gnu.org > From: Rolf Ade > > Am 04.05.24 um 16:11 schrieb Eli Zaretskii: > >> Date: Sat, 4 May 2024 15:32:27 +0200 > >> From: Rolf Ade > >> > >>>> Even if I answer with "n" I get the message: > >>>> > >>>> "No symbol \"debuginfod\" in current context." > >>> > [...] > >>> What OS are you using GDB on, and what is your GDB version, please? > >> > >> This is basically a GNU/linux debian 11.9 (so, not that old). More specifically, > >> uname -a: > >> > >> Linux pointsman2 5.10.0-28-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 5.10.209-2 (2024-01-31) x86_64 > >> GNU/Linux > >> > >> gdb --version (it's the version installed by the debian package management system): > >> > >> GNU gdb (Debian 10.1-1.7) 10.1.90.20210103-git > > > > Strange. GDB 10.1 was the version where debuginfod support was added. > > What does the shell command below show? > > > > $ gdb --config | fgrep debuginfod > > This returns > > --with-debuginfod Then I'm really stumped. If you start GDB from the shell prompt, like this: $ gdb ./emacs and then, when GDB shows its "(gdb)" prompt, type (gdb) set debuginfod enabled on do you also see that "No symbol" error message? And also please try this: $ gdb -i=mi ./emacs ... -gdb-set debuginfod enabled on and see if you get any error message that way. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat May 04 12:27:12 2024 Received: (at 70764) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 May 2024 16:27:12 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54525 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1s3IEB-0002hI-P4 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 04 May 2024 12:27:12 -0400 Received: from mail.nepustil.net ([2001:14f8:1:1::8]:63422) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1s3IE9-0002hC-6x for 70764@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 04 May 2024 12:27:10 -0400 Received: from p5b317896.dip0.t-ipconnect.de ([91.49.120.150]:38818 helo=[192.168.178.42]) by mail.nepustil.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.3) tls TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (Exim 4.95 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1s3IB4-000CAM-M8; Sat, 04 May 2024 18:26:40 +0200 Message-ID: <83b7bcd5-9fb8-4318-9dc2-8bb63049bc5a@pointsman.de> Date: Sat, 4 May 2024 18:26:41 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: bug#70764: 29.1; M-x gdb: don't ask me about debuginfod server if debuginfod is not in context To: Eli Zaretskii References: <87jzkatjyj.fsf@pointsman.de> <86v83ugi0q.fsf@gnu.org> <54b3a581-8e00-4bf1-9051-5b826cd9c306@pointsman.de> <86jzk9fyzb.fsf@gnu.org> <1ef03828-d29d-4157-b40a-f88e9f13d909@pointsman.de> <86fruxfte6.fsf@gnu.org> From: Rolf Ade Content-Language: de-CH In-Reply-To: <86fruxfte6.fsf@gnu.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 70764 Cc: 70764@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Am 04.05.24 um 18:12 schrieb Eli Zaretskii: >> Date: Sat, 4 May 2024 17:42:20 +0200 >> Cc: 70764@debbugs.gnu.org >> From: Rolf Ade >> >> Am 04.05.24 um 16:11 schrieb Eli Zaretskii: >>>> Date: Sat, 4 May 2024 15:32:27 +0200 >>>> From: Rolf Ade [...] >>> >>> Strange. GDB 10.1 was the version where debuginfod support was added. >>> What does the shell command below show? >>> >>> $ gdb --config | fgrep debuginfod >> >> This returns >> >> --with-debuginfod > > Then I'm really stumped. > > If you start GDB from the shell prompt, like this: > > $ gdb ./emacs > > and then, when GDB shows its "(gdb)" prompt, type > > (gdb) set debuginfod enabled on > > do you also see that "No symbol" error message? Yes: (gdb) set debuginfod enabled on No symbol "debuginfod" in current context. (gdb) > And also please try this: > > $ gdb -i=mi ./emacs > ... > -gdb-set debuginfod enabled on > > and see if you get any error message that way. Yes: (gdb) -gdb-set debuginfod enabled on ^error,msg="No symbol \"debuginfod\" in current context." (gdb) So, this all seems to lead to that the gdb shipped with Bullseye isn't correctly build (despite the --with-debuginfod in the gdb --config output). I see this on two different boxes with debian 11.9; this is not specific to a single machine. But Bullseye still isn't that uncommon; so others should also see this, I suppose? From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat May 04 13:08:24 2024 Received: (at 70764) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 May 2024 17:08:24 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54711 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1s3Is4-00061b-0X for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 04 May 2024 13:08:24 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:49090) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1s3Is1-00061M-0V for 70764@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 04 May 2024 13:08:21 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1s3IrW-0004N7-RP; Sat, 04 May 2024 13:07:51 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=plbuTdYKqah4PnIMVfj8PYl5A0ffgpqpYjIOY4mFmEo=; b=ibfpu1jtjyiy IN46hVdjehwk2HdCmNEjXuU9c+uKjMe/AhkwhUDkD+z5a4b1N8Wxwhcal87lV+v96Gmw8ip7AbRfJ 1REApdDm6rxLzmap0g+0jJKTd5EVvVD7ehBRCt6zKyNGv363JbBjjS3s4dCNbwF2XIMfVf8Pv3En3 p3rs1PZ+fY25Qs6jb/NSanZTPBtN/mvCo45F35K7lym7amVMynK5YaHx7BxkBZSY6FEmq2X4qjpaa mjQKPFbwGrTYh4GJ6qjTWQ7KRRMM0XYXJTJ/Ey7LZ30HexXRm7sdRIWmkHYVi014fHHxsWC81NbMh x69z1rWiofWIUsv9e8BHPA==; Date: Sat, 04 May 2024 20:07:31 +0300 Message-Id: <86a5l5fquk.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: Rolf Ade In-Reply-To: <83b7bcd5-9fb8-4318-9dc2-8bb63049bc5a@pointsman.de> (message from Rolf Ade on Sat, 4 May 2024 18:26:41 +0200) Subject: Re: bug#70764: 29.1; M-x gdb: don't ask me about debuginfod server if debuginfod is not in context References: <87jzkatjyj.fsf@pointsman.de> <86v83ugi0q.fsf@gnu.org> <54b3a581-8e00-4bf1-9051-5b826cd9c306@pointsman.de> <86jzk9fyzb.fsf@gnu.org> <1ef03828-d29d-4157-b40a-f88e9f13d909@pointsman.de> <86fruxfte6.fsf@gnu.org> <83b7bcd5-9fb8-4318-9dc2-8bb63049bc5a@pointsman.de> X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 70764 Cc: 70764@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) > Date: Sat, 4 May 2024 18:26:41 +0200 > Cc: 70764@debbugs.gnu.org > From: Rolf Ade > > > If you start GDB from the shell prompt, like this: > > > > $ gdb ./emacs > > > > and then, when GDB shows its "(gdb)" prompt, type > > > > (gdb) set debuginfod enabled on > > > > do you also see that "No symbol" error message? > > Yes: > > (gdb) set debuginfod enabled on > No symbol "debuginfod" in current context. > (gdb) > > > > And also please try this: > > > > $ gdb -i=mi ./emacs > > ... > > -gdb-set debuginfod enabled on > > > > and see if you get any error message that way. > > Yes: > > (gdb) > -gdb-set debuginfod enabled on > ^error,msg="No symbol \"debuginfod\" in current context." > (gdb) > > So, this all seems to lead to that the gdb shipped with Bullseye isn't correctly > build (despite the --with-debuginfod in the gdb --config output). Most probably, yes. > But Bullseye still isn't that uncommon; so others should also see this, I suppose? Unfortunately, the only better alternative to stop these error messages is for you to customize gdb-debuginfod-enable-setting to the nil value. That is the only way we know of that allows to prevent the error messages by avoiding to even try the problematic setting. No other way we tried at the time to dynamically detect the support worked in a satisfactory manner, basically because trying an unsupported command is bound to trigger some error message. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat May 18 04:36:38 2024 Received: (at 70764-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 May 2024 08:36:38 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60321 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1s8FYU-0007aB-2U for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 18 May 2024 04:36:38 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:39020) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1s8FYS-0007a5-3S for 70764-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 18 May 2024 04:36:36 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1s8FYG-0004AV-Pe; Sat, 18 May 2024 04:36:24 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=CFzgtLreCFB0E56xNhhz8orQLIGApgKy7KZOYB+0gOY=; b=nVTCJFqx1oLd kodHmUcih6swcLjrTeMgtcuTcrimHFThYg3s3iHM4b6NbPAQE+rV3iJsQ6ufEs9sAKSLQh6/5GVLW rHXHIE2wdYDfL4O7Ax7Unw5dZ2ormGGyyZOi66Ig+fdlsGmTrywrTNx9QlVj4CPuCoAfCYzCMZhHp gGXxhcZFkilQ/77BYDgMG8XLCdy4/Evc0nzKbqWBZrx9iquqgcbCbaKkxRvEMpfLmf1kwBD0iJrC4 2FBkpWu6xZDIlcbOshcITOU4Um+3+UrPsGPRefp0nWv7ektx8VIUgVJ9SzKrnGPZCIUVH5kZPD0XH k5cr8TN6H0IWQNV5yFeVxA==; Date: Sat, 18 May 2024 11:36:21 +0300 Message-Id: <86y187ecu2.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: rolf@pointsman.de In-Reply-To: <86a5l5fquk.fsf@gnu.org> (message from Eli Zaretskii on Sat, 04 May 2024 20:07:31 +0300) Subject: Re: bug#70764: 29.1; M-x gdb: don't ask me about debuginfod server if debuginfod is not in context References: <87jzkatjyj.fsf@pointsman.de> <86v83ugi0q.fsf@gnu.org> <54b3a581-8e00-4bf1-9051-5b826cd9c306@pointsman.de> <86jzk9fyzb.fsf@gnu.org> <1ef03828-d29d-4157-b40a-f88e9f13d909@pointsman.de> <86fruxfte6.fsf@gnu.org> <83b7bcd5-9fb8-4318-9dc2-8bb63049bc5a@pointsman.de> <86a5l5fquk.fsf@gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 70764-done Cc: 70764-done@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) > Cc: 70764@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Sat, 04 May 2024 20:07:31 +0300 > From: Eli Zaretskii > > > (gdb) > > -gdb-set debuginfod enabled on > > ^error,msg="No symbol \"debuginfod\" in current context." > > (gdb) > > > > So, this all seems to lead to that the gdb shipped with Bullseye isn't correctly > > build (despite the --with-debuginfod in the gdb --config output). > > Most probably, yes. > > > But Bullseye still isn't that uncommon; so others should also see this, I suppose? > > Unfortunately, the only better alternative to stop these error > messages is for you to customize gdb-debuginfod-enable-setting to the > nil value. That is the only way we know of that allows to prevent the > error messages by avoiding to even try the problematic setting. No > other way we tried at the time to dynamically detect the support > worked in a satisfactory manner, basically because trying an > unsupported command is bound to trigger some error message. No further comments within 2 weeks, so I'm now closing this bug. From unknown Fri Aug 15 04:08:06 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2024 11:24:14 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator