GNU bug report logs - #70759
[PATCH guix-artwork] website: Add post about ‘guix git authenticate’.

Previous Next

Package: guix-patches;

Reported by: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>

Date: Fri, 3 May 2024 20:59:01 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: patch

Done: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #20 received at 70759 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com>
To: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
Cc: 70759 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Tomas Volf <~@wolfsden.cz>,
 "pelzflorian \(Florian Pelz\)" <pelzflorian <at> pelzflorian.de>, guix-blog <at> gnu.org,
 Skyler Ferris <skyvine <at> protonmail.com>
Subject: Re: bug#70759: [PATCH guix-artwork] website: Add post about ‘guix git authenticate’.
Date: Mon, 6 May 2024 18:26:41 +0200
Hi,

On Mon, 6 May 2024 at 17:49, Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org> wrote:

> I tried to reword it in a way similar to what I did in the Programming
> paper to clarify that it’s not just about lock-in but also about
> semantics:
>
>   Signing commits is part of the solution, but it’s not enough to
>   _authenticate_ a set of commits that you pull; all it shows is that,
>   well, those commits are signed.  Badges aren’t much better: the presence
>   of a “verified” badge only shows that the commit is signed by the
>   OpenPGP key *currently registered* for the corresponding GitLab/GitHub
>   account.  It’s another source of lock-in and makes the hosting platform
>   a trusted third-party.  Worse, there’s no notion of authorization (which
>   keys are authorized), let alone tracking of the history of authorization
>   changes.  Not helpful.
>
> Does that clarify things?

Yes, this wording clarifies the issue of badges.  For what my view is
worth here, I would write: badges acts as a service, as with an
infrastructure as a service or platform as a service.  Else LGTM.


> I hope that clarifies my intention.

Thanks for the clarification.

> Now, if you get it done, you have my recognition *and* we can post a
> followup saying: look, there’s now at least one standalone tool for you.
> :-)

Deal. :-)

Cheers,
simon




This bug report was last modified 1 year and 13 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.