Subject: bug#70686: 30.0.50; cl--position is slow

From: No Wayman <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2024 19:51:23 -0400

I've recently been avoiding cl-position, cl-remove-duplicates, and any other functions which use it internally. I realize there's a performance trade-off in for the flexibility such functions provide, but it may be worth investigating cl--position in particular. Today I replaced an instance of cl-remove-duplicates with an equivalent cl-loop for a 15x performance improvement at the cost of 2 lines of code.