From unknown Sat Jun 21 03:27:23 2025 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.509 (Entity 5.509) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 From: bug#70662 <70662@debbugs.gnu.org> To: bug#70662 <70662@debbugs.gnu.org> Subject: Status: Problems building nss@3.98.0 Reply-To: bug#70662 <70662@debbugs.gnu.org> Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2025 10:27:23 +0000 retitle 70662 Problems building nss@3.98.0 reassign 70662 guix submitter 70662 Christopher Baines severity 70662 normal thanks From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Apr 30 05:03:07 2024 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Apr 2024 09:03:07 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59234 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1s1jOF-0005zg-7U for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 30 Apr 2024 05:03:07 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:470:142::17]:57298) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1s1jOA-0005zF-RK for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 30 Apr 2024 05:03:05 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1s1jNk-0007oD-LK for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 30 Apr 2024 05:02:36 -0400 Received: from mira.cbaines.net ([2a01:7e00:e000:2f8:fd4d:b5c7:13fb:3d27]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1s1jNi-000359-71 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 30 Apr 2024 05:02:36 -0400 Received: from localhost (unknown [212.132.255.10]) by mira.cbaines.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6BBDA27BBE2 for ; Tue, 30 Apr 2024 10:02:31 +0100 (BST) Received: from felis (localhost.lan [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id bd9d9c1f for ; Tue, 30 Apr 2024 09:02:30 +0000 (UTC) From: Christopher Baines To: bug-guix@gnu.org Subject: Problems building nss@3.98.0 User-Agent: mu4e 1.12.2; emacs 29.3 Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2024 10:02:28 +0100 Message-ID: <87v83zxly3.fsf@cbaines.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a01:7e00:e000:2f8:fd4d:b5c7:13fb:3d27; envelope-from=mail@cbaines.net; helo=mira.cbaines.net X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: 0.9 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.1 (/) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain nss@3.98.0 seems really difficult to build, currently on the bordeaux build farm it's failed all attempts to build it on all architectures except riscv64-linux and aarch64-linux [1]. 1: https://data.guix.gnu.org/revision/9593750698394b6fecd73e7fca00409ea1ffa2e3/package/nss/3.98.0?locale=en_US.UTF-8 The 3.88.1 version seemed to have built fine, so what's up here? --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQKlBAEBCgCPFiEEPonu50WOcg2XVOCyXiijOwuE9XcFAmYws6RfFIAAAAAALgAo aXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3BlbnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldDNF ODlFRUU3NDU4RTcyMEQ5NzU0RTBCMjVFMjhBMzNCMEI4NEY1NzcRHG1haWxAY2Jh aW5lcy5uZXQACgkQXiijOwuE9XdrqxAAr4lt8ah2D5HVmer5Vmgw6g7/bQgp5wIn oDm5oYdyR4UOJr5kGQKxl8yuwxOmzxZDws1e+xndAAdLcKxbuiX/afjkhE0N6Oqt ecDqcSNVAPQ7tHA/iLkxeC5k2GGcQ2OlFr6aXHeiUmN5SBZYNuTJUBr5rU0hcDZB Z3SN8qU3+X/Geu0TZVYTq9YAvrsKXiDLKG2nSYyxkVsCSqIVJD5sQMOcVssxO/UJ 5Iu+W4tzjUqDI4E52OYmCu+fvOqvDSA9FQmh9ER2I0IOES4sdpetHle1bvHcK26a BsGvrGYAYycOPjCTGp324mwbA7RZaUu2C4i0hcVOJDLpRYEmKlHikEx3Q474m/Cj pP6k3wH0mm/0/GeEh0/hA1zm+sMSegmfuamoOMpCednDg3/Wd1epSlOL1ZKoqz9P ZslbU0qIXLDHSVx9NvpcWMVkNx/i37h0GrDT529L/SUHVwSpJU9cnfH+JbbyDPNx elN4jCUYy0unhueCbrOvl2+erxVn2yLjo6UBDP4b2YMQ9zEgLNlo2cCs4GLmv8FS NYrB+UlOJfAumS//75QZixQ4opgHuXbBeLneed90A6sc9V/dlzejxl2oUUk1koLI aTTw9sdN016V14jze2Tan7je+pnxetnbV+dIXmx34GmofyeP08DQ8a5TyHSywp/C k0/KA7mpV3E= =+HgZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue May 14 06:20:05 2024 Received: (at 70662) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 May 2024 10:20:05 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38417 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1s6pGP-0005k9-DA for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 14 May 2024 06:20:05 -0400 Received: from vmi993448.contaboserver.net ([194.163.141.236]:47142 helo=mutix.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1s6pGK-0005jf-LK; Tue, 14 May 2024 06:20:04 -0400 Received: from [192.168.1.172] (unknown [217.46.106.239]) (Authenticated sender: cdo) by mutix.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0B327A63C0D; Tue, 14 May 2024 12:19:58 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <339167fe-c899-1303-166f-8040b49f0f59@mutix.org> Date: Tue, 14 May 2024 11:19:57 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.15.0 Subject: Re: Scheduling a new release? Content-Language: en-US To: Christopher Baines , Simon Tournier References: <878r0nqjmu.fsf@gmail.com> <87jzk4fofj.fsf@cbaines.net> From: Christina O'Donnell In-Reply-To: <87jzk4fofj.fsf@cbaines.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: -3.4 (---) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 70662 Cc: Guix Devel , 70662@debbugs.gnu.org, 70663@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -4.4 (----) Hi, On 08/05/2024 14:01, Christopher Baines wrote: > I think it would be nice to have a new release, and indeed release more > often, I think the way to get there is for less things to be broken > between releases, such that releasing takes less effort in terms of > testing and fixing things. > > To give some specific issues, I've run up against the recent issues with > nss [1][2] and I don't think we could release with the nss package as is > currently. > > 1: https://issues.guix.gnu.org/70662 > 2: https://issues.guix.gnu.org/70663 I can fix these by disabling tests, but I would prefer if someone with more experience packaging for guix could make a decision on it. Otherwise, I don't have any problem reducing the number of tests and disabling all tests on PowerPC at least. I could also do some analysis if it was deemed necessary, inserting a patch to measure the timings of each test/cycle. Additionally, I could try packaging some of the versions between 0.88 and 0.98 to identify the exact change that could be to blame. However, both of these seem overkill, given the backlog of patches/issues we have left to get through, and the manpower we currently have to work with. Would any of that be helpful? > ... Kind regards, Christina From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue May 21 19:43:52 2024 Received: (at 70662) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 May 2024 23:43:52 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51873 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1s9Z95-00080q-NO for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 21 May 2024 19:43:52 -0400 Received: from mail-oi1-f182.google.com ([209.85.167.182]:61722) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1s9Z92-00080f-3b; Tue, 21 May 2024 19:43:49 -0400 Received: by mail-oi1-f182.google.com with SMTP id 5614622812f47-3c9d70d93dbso1950397b6e.3; Tue, 21 May 2024 16:43:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1716334956; x=1716939756; darn=debbugs.gnu.org; h=mime-version:user-agent:message-id:date:references:in-reply-to :subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=HoxBJtNN6werL/C7I13sL2oWmAWczsgK+ybqrUoinFM=; b=N8yh9qknKvlTZxTyhes4gzZ6fcN6BOA4LxDVbGuz9WP3sz8CgDuijgxuhKQtmPXaft qena6dHJAQJyGPkcFab0Z4nfyyyq/RTs8zkaOHKnRzFRkYZzBBEzBzESDqco1v0JUEcj OaOzapLs0fOFRrP7BX+lSHeseGZc1ypM3uLSaOgEcSMRqvIy0e1R+QJszlAoUG8Zu1/2 VozzSDoi4shZJiNjl7Dwobg5ZTkM7/eF8G+uiqI/ZhNVVZQtaZel7R1ZXKU3vIuVe2iW fIR0sSRF5MiOpULagTF2eNRyASIlvqRZOSiKplKhCOqCWVHQkr+q0/cZWb9afk40snLz McoA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1716334956; x=1716939756; h=mime-version:user-agent:message-id:date:references:in-reply-to :subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=HoxBJtNN6werL/C7I13sL2oWmAWczsgK+ybqrUoinFM=; b=NHWOMwA1p+qFL+B3OFqEZJ3iJuBtiUWJ2DXo6LqW21xuikUDhjMq9V4JM6NgNz5KFn eutLicWyatT/2qwxISPrCBZ59jvPRoEfrwY+/yr23JJE6Ip9vZHnnhWFG33NzFt6SGtU k335NY5OaHam3AJy8YuGW7XRlRSFuMfKSQAyfDGrkxoE3887c/F4/7bbByBb8hdFBL2o XhprhRejhBt4d1At5sJ1HR5qklED9ALHdVRAOD4hMbt+7YSwn/4a2ON7QCEC2wnZBfnI sdon/pKf3QXiaSE+J5FCESxaOsKtvXeMy0Aef88IXUK5929vg9vY+PRL3oWz0o2VHyZ1 OU/A== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCVnjxKQr3NS/cbZbaYRNK5vJGuOtoMLMskb+fo7BJ/MiXw1WUAUBwtE1E/sGN1w4+Ie5EztXzElYhoNCLUzCnFMjSkZIFUQtB2fukBt+j//xX4dVvm+/gr5HLrQgw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzN7ckQQAdhjxKTLuHVTzuJ0gKe294shQpYZxduhlk01adrlt4X rb355OTVEKYzsIXdA1JP+BlDsp4W2tjjc6w9sRvpBe9gy1F1p9HsHk+j/A== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFdqz5cZEj9LFTX+itertnoEse8dCGPZIlUn/ymC3GIxxDUdx09J8xXwyCx6eOCGgxjyaDNZA== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6808:179e:b0:3c9:6dd3:32dc with SMTP id 5614622812f47-3cdb66b0d8cmr578971b6e.30.1716334955844; Tue, 21 May 2024 16:42:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hurd (dsl-205-233-124-234.b2b2c.ca. [205.233.124.234]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id af79cd13be357-792bf27591bsm1338584185a.16.2024.05.21.16.42.34 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 21 May 2024 16:42:35 -0700 (PDT) From: Maxim Cournoyer To: Christina O'Donnell Subject: Re: bug#70662: Problems building nss@3.98.0 In-Reply-To: <339167fe-c899-1303-166f-8040b49f0f59@mutix.org> (Christina O'Donnell's message of "Tue, 14 May 2024 11:19:57 +0100") References: <878r0nqjmu.fsf@gmail.com> <87jzk4fofj.fsf@cbaines.net> <339167fe-c899-1303-166f-8040b49f0f59@mutix.org> Date: Tue, 21 May 2024 19:42:33 -0400 Message-ID: <878r0268ba.fsf_-_@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 70662 Cc: Guix Devel , 70662@debbugs.gnu.org, Christopher Baines , 70663@debbugs.gnu.org, Simon Tournier X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Hi, Christina O'Donnell writes: > Hi, > > On 08/05/2024 14:01, Christopher Baines wrote: >> I think it would be nice to have a new release, and indeed release more >> often, I think the way to get there is for less things to be broken >> between releases, such that releasing takes less effort in terms of >> testing and fixing things. >> >> To give some specific issues, I've run up against the recent issues with >> nss [1][2] and I don't think we could release with the nss package as is >> currently. >> >> 1: https://issues.guix.gnu.org/70662 >> 2: https://issues.guix.gnu.org/70663 > > I can fix these by disabling tests, but I would prefer if someone with > more experience packaging for guix could make a decision on > it. Otherwise, I don't have any problem reducing the number of tests > and disabling all tests on PowerPC at least. > > I could also do some analysis if it was deemed necessary, inserting a > patch to measure the timings of each test/cycle. Additionally, I could > try packaging some of the versions between 0.88 and 0.98 to identify > the exact change that could be to blame. However, both of these seem > overkill, given the backlog of patches/issues we have left to get > through, and the manpower we currently have to work with. > > Would any of that be helpful? I just encountered the following single test failure building on powerpc64le: --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- time certutil -K -d /tmp/guix-build-nss-3.99.0.drv-0/nss-3.99/tests_results/security/localhost.1/bigdir -f ../tests.pw ------------- time ---------------------- real 10.32 user 10.25 sys 0.07 10 seconds dbtests.sh: #27: certutil dump keys with explicit default trust flags - FAILED --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- with the summary: --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- SUMMARY: ======== NSS variables: -------------- HOST=localhost DOMSUF=localdomain BUILD_OPT= USE_X32= USE_64=1 NSS_CYCLES="" NSS_TESTS="" NSS_SSL_TESTS="crl iopr policy normal_normal" NSS_SSL_RUN="cov auth stapling signed_cert_timestamps scheme" NSS_AIA_PATH= NSS_AIA_HTTP= NSS_AIA_OCSP= IOPR_HOSTADDR_LIST= PKITS_DATA= NSS_DISABLE_HW_AES= NSS_DISABLE_HW_SHA1= NSS_DISABLE_HW_SHA2= NSS_DISABLE_PCLMUL= NSS_DISABLE_AVX= NSS_DISABLE_ARM_NEON= NSS_DISABLE_SSSE3= Tests summary: -------------- Passed: 79016 Failed: 1 Failed with core: 0 ASan failures: 0 Unknown status: 2 TinderboxPrint:Unknown: 2 error: in phase 'check': uncaught exception: %exception #<&invoke-error program: "faketime" arguments: ("2024-01-23" "./nss/tests/all.sh") exit-status: 1 term-signal: #f stop-signal: #f> phase `check' failed after 36124.0 seconds command "faketime" "2024-01-23" "./nss/tests/all.sh" failed with status 1 builder for `/gnu/store/q3cqzzd4fg384lfmk91gd6higsyhs1nq-nss-3.99.0.drv' failed with exit code 1 @ build-failed /gnu/store/q3cqzzd4fg384lfmk91gd6higsyhs1nq-nss-3.99.0.drv - 1 builder for `/gnu/store/q3cqzzd4fg384lfmk91gd6higsyhs1nq-nss-3.99.0.drv' failed with exit code 1 --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- So I'm not sure why, but the 'certutil dump keys with explicit default trust flags' fails on powerpc64le and should probably be disabled. Also, 36124 s, ouch! #70950 should help for that. -- Thanks, Maxim