From unknown Wed Jun 18 23:07:43 2025 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.509 (Entity 5.509) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 From: bug#70526 <70526@debbugs.gnu.org> To: bug#70526 <70526@debbugs.gnu.org> Subject: Status: 29.2; package-vc-upgrade failed with error message "File is not under version control" Reply-To: bug#70526 <70526@debbugs.gnu.org> Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2025 06:07:43 +0000 retitle 70526 29.2; package-vc-upgrade failed with error message "File is n= ot under version control" reassign 70526 emacs submitter 70526 "Yi Yue" severity 70526 normal thanks From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Apr 23 01:15:25 2024 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Apr 2024 05:15:25 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49888 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rz8Ux-0006AU-HI for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 23 Apr 2024 01:15:25 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:470:142::17]:55130) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rz5ZB-0002Fy-A8 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 22 Apr 2024 22:07:32 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rz5Yp-0008SA-7b for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Apr 2024 22:07:07 -0400 Received: from xmbgsz7.mail.foxmail.com ([61.241.55.213]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rz5Yi-0008El-Ae for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Apr 2024 22:07:07 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=qq.com; s=s201512; t=1713838008; bh=pEfWJzGCWecj1q0KsbjAEGV+P1K8B0jGBHOTtMSHKyg=; h=From:To:Subject:Date; b=gVzZftHhQc4QTqp2D2lfTIugrNJtp9LAhwTncFWifFdkO9JiitPaJfcJoInW0kD9J etDFh9VB3bMakHIhoLx9dVCrkEqRFPXKHVgrLQZvrr1qjV6fas0jVbvu25mclupgoF I/JyS87q7nyOfG9KRlzEITw8LHl9zHoOTAodkrlI= X-QQ-FEAT: oHWrrGTW1dAsGLFenq4sogOoyW13zn73 X-QQ-SSF: 00000000000000F0000000000000 X-QQ-XMRINFO: Nq+8W0+stu50PRdwbJxPCL0= X-QQ-XMAILINFO: NmzFr00/PFngf4heb9mDjzvR9Cxbw34PR25OXmEI49+Ibyq94eurvI3W/xoGcQ MoPXcOb1GvNyCJMieMl+4GHwk+H4QNudJyByglEm5uHhBeVfswS2OTzMx7HBSqghP+7RrSfRuCLTu GZGYSyWfFpRSj8gchoioJNSI5azytPu9QdFL30Zijm6Imtye/ltaraKW14VbwTmIPOzINEbBYoEBj IMiEPf6bVRdRmIqOVCzoPQAv8pXWClRCxeV3F+PUum0ibLSfL3kucGL1pgDYAbYO/QhoVpcX8ArQj fgY+xBtjx38X9M2gQ1QedQ+0y5vWcNLEy4KhQIkSbHpYFIWu7PSiPm5oTRpkV9JOQKDDwycttqg82 +YkEVMZyd0SEhRlSbVOEhjndQIrtD/9rfdiLF9Hb0qxS5HpUfQ7egNo76Ea0oBCLzt/GyGeKtaqaB bL8FPM6yik7YX6sLsWfDdynRvzPNw/WnCJ89tk/JX/OHXDU8mkZIN/iLr4Iy4PbKLTF+TEEo6/Pt5 R+x448tJRW5e+uebzQMFCFOO4GXCDai0cyo0ZjABvYW2SHSJbzunWLU+0U9PNxk52SgbFBLyHEVvP jAcrUcSynoVBhtRl9bmeOLzL9E1jnsKI40Ud7pa4dRZMw8muKk2LI6/9BdfHiMfmaa8oSmbDabsm6 dvLYvc2n9GMF51AGCZVvh0Q2uGZzJpgGfQCMQUFB/VykHaAgV6G/FKHQyG99A7LBZTDn4BPl4Vp8q 0XeUReUtyieM1MUWjdoLl6Xj+vAIPvlnRkp0sCYzrXJ5iuPF9uVs5bKqaDAUTcXJpF9Si/nRhUHri wvAF9jGnxn+gt2lVqFFGWFh7GC0+gVU6MhbbakFL3r1xP3rC/gEdaS9A0QZ94sB0Pt2ZOuZ+nDSNR /GuSrExEahc64Qzlme1XSlHrTbLlbduxonNHgCBEDPZFtTPxkwLxi+ipFHGy5x/baq5tRpSuIFW29 z9vmcFHEV41G3eH3mpGuTPGhZ9NaQwELtwtWHHqQ== X-HAS-ATTACH: no X-QQ-BUSINESS-ORIGIN: 2 X-Originating-IP: 119.175.143.156 X-QQ-STYLE: X-QQ-mid: webmail739t1713837079t2631559 From: "=?ISO-8859-1?B?WWkgWXVl?=" To: "=?ISO-8859-1?B?YnVnLWdudS1lbWFjcw==?=" Subject: 29.2; package-vc-upgrade failed with error message "File is not under version control" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_66271416_1A098C70_62CEAD8B" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8Bit Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2024 10:51:18 +0900 X-Priority: 3 Message-ID: X-QQ-MIME: TCMime 1.0 by Tencent X-Mailer: QQMail 2.x X-QQ-Mailer: QQMail 2.x Received-SPF: pass client-ip=61.241.55.213; envelope-from=include_yy@qq.com; helo=xmbgsz7.mail.foxmail.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, FROM_EXCESS_BASE64=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: 0.9 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 23 Apr 2024 01:15:14 -0400 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.1 (/) This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_66271416_1A098C70_62CEAD8B Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 SGkgYWxsOg0KDQoNCkkgZW5jb3VudGVyZWQgdGhlIGZvbGxvd2luZyBCYWNrdHJhY2UgaW5m b3JtYXRpb24gd2hlbiBpbnZva2luZw0KYHBhY2thZ2UtdmMtdXBncmFkZScuDQoNCg0KRGVi dWdnZXIgZW50ZXJlZC0tTGlzcCBlcnJvcjogKGVycm9yICJGaWxlIGlzIG5vdCB1bmRlciB2 ZXJzaW9uIGNvbnRyb2wiKQ0KJm5ic3A7IGVycm9yKCJGaWxlIGlzIG5vdCB1bmRlciB2ZXJz aW9uIGNvbnRyb2wiKQ0KJm5ic3A7IHZjLWRlZHVjZS1maWxlc2V0LTEodCBuaWwgbmlsKQ0K Jm5ic3A7IHZjLWRlZHVjZS1maWxlc2V0KHQpDQombmJzcDsgdmMtcHVsbCgpDQombmJzcDsg Li4uLi4uDQoNCg0KQWZ0ZXIgc29tZSBlZGVidWcgZGVidWdnaW5nIGFuZCByZWFkaW5nIHRo ZSBzb3VyY2UgY29kZSwgSSBmb3VuZCB0aGF0DQp0aGlzIGVycm9yIG9jY3VycyBpZiB0aGUg YnVmZmVyIHdoZXJlIGBwYWNrYWdlLXZjLXVwZ3JhZGUnIGlzIGNhbGxlZCBpcw0Kbm90IHVu ZGVyIGEgZ2l0IHJlcG9zaXRvcnkuIEFkZGl0aW9uYWxseSwgaWYgdGhlIGN1cnJlbnQgYnVm ZmVyIG9mIHRoZQ0KY29tbWFuZCBpbnZvY2F0aW9uIGRvZXMgbm90IGNvcnJlc3BvbmQgdG8g YSBzcGVjaWZpYyBmaWxlLCB0aGVuIHRoZQ0KY29tbWFuZCBjYW4gZXhlY3V0ZSBub3JtYWxs eS4NCg0KDQpBZnRlciByZWFkaW5nIHRoZSBpbXBsZW1lbnRhdGlvbiBvZiBgcGFja2FnZS12 Yy11cGdyYWRlJywgSSBmb3VuZCB0aGF0IGl0DQpiaW5kcyBgZGVmYXVsdC1kaXJlY3Rvcnkn IHRvIHRoZSBwYWNrYWdlJ3MgcGF0aC4gSG93ZXZlciwgdGhlIGludGVybmFsbHkNCmNhbGxl ZCBgdmMtcHVsbCcgZnVuY3Rpb24sIHdoaWNoIHVzZXMgYHZjLWRlZHVjZS1maWxlc2V0LTEn LCBmaXJzdA0KdXRpbGl6ZXMgYGJ1ZmZlci1maWxlLW5hbWUnIGluc3RlYWQgb2YgYGRlZmF1 bHQtZGlyZWN0b3J5JyB0byBmZXRjaA0KdmVyc2lvbiBjb250cm9sIGJhY2tlbmQgcmVsYXRl ZCBpbmZvcm1hdGlvbiwgd2hpY2ggbGVhZHMgdG8gdGhpcyBlcnJvci4NCg0KDQpJbiBteSBw YXN0IHVzYWdlLCBJIGRpZCBub3QgZW5jb3VudGVyIHRoaXMgZXJyb3IsIHByb2JhYmx5IGJl Y2F1c2UgSQ0KdXN1YWxseSBpbnZva2VkIGl0IHdpdGhpbiBhIGZpbGUgYnVmZmVyIHVuZGVy IGEgZ2l0IHJlcG9zaXRvcnksIG9yIHVzZWQNCnRoZSBjb21tYW5kIGluIGEgYnVmZmVyIHBy b3ZpZGVkIGJ5IGBsaXN0LXBhY2thZ2VzJy4gSGVyZSBpcyBvbmUNCnNvbHV0aW9uIEkgdXNl ZDoNCg0KDQood2hlbiAoZXEgZW1hY3MtbWFqb3ItdmVyc2lvbiAyOSkNCiZuYnNwOyAoZGVm dW4geXkvcGFja2FnZS12Yy11cGdyYWRlLWFkdmljZSAodXBmdW4gcGtnLWRlc2MpDQombmJz cDsgJm5ic3A7ICh3aXRoLXRlbXAtYnVmZmVyDQombmJzcDsgJm5ic3A7ICZuYnNwOyAoZnVu Y2FsbCB1cGZ1biBwa2ctZGVzYykpKQ0KJm5ic3A7IChhZHZpY2UtYWRkICdwYWNrYWdlLXZj LXVwZ3JhZGUgOmFyb3VuZCAneXkvcGFja2FnZS12Yy11cGdyYWRlLWFkdmljZSkpDQoNCg0K SW4gYSBtaW5pbWFsIGVudmlyb25tZW50IHdpdGggZW1hY3MgLVEsIHRoZSBmb2xsb3dpbmcg c3RlcHMgY2FuDQpyZXByb2R1Y2UgbXkgaXNzdWU6DQoNCg0KOzsgYSBzaW1wbGUgcGFja2Fn ZSBieSBwdXJjZWxsDQoocGFja2FnZS12Yy1pbnN0YWxsICJodHRwczovL2dpdGh1Yi5jb20v cHVyY2VsbC91bmZpbGwiKQ0KOzsgdGhlbiB0cnkgdG8gdXBncmFkZSBpdCBpbiBhIGJ1ZmZl ciB0aGF0IGJ1ZmZlci1maWxlLW5hbWUgaXMgbm90IG5pbA0KOzsgYW5kIHRoZSBmaWxlIGlz IG5vdCB1bmRlciBHaXQgdmVyc2lvbiBjb250cm9sIHN5c3RlbS4NCk0teCBwYWNrYWdlLXZj LXVwZ3JhZGUgdW5maWxsIFJFVA0KOzsgbm93IHRoZSBlcnJvciBtYXkgb2NjdXJzDQoNCg0K UmVnYXJkcw0KDQoNCllJIFlVRQ== ------=_NextPart_66271416_1A098C70_62CEAD8B Content-Type: text/html; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 PG1ldGEgaHR0cC1lcXVpdj0iQ29udGVudC1UeXBlIiBjb250ZW50PSJ0ZXh0L2h0bWw7IGNo YXJzZXQ9R0IxODAzMCI+PGRpdj48ZGl2PkhpIGFsbDo8L2Rpdj48ZGl2Pjxicj48L2Rpdj48 ZGl2PkkgZW5jb3VudGVyZWQgdGhlIGZvbGxvd2luZyBCYWNrdHJhY2UgaW5mb3JtYXRpb24g d2hlbiBpbnZva2luZzwvZGl2PjxkaXY+YHBhY2thZ2UtdmMtdXBncmFkZScuPC9kaXY+PGRp dj48YnI+PC9kaXY+PGRpdj5EZWJ1Z2dlciBlbnRlcmVkLS1MaXNwIGVycm9yOiAoZXJyb3Ig IkZpbGUgaXMgbm90IHVuZGVyIHZlcnNpb24gY29udHJvbCIpPC9kaXY+PGRpdj4mbmJzcDsg ZXJyb3IoIkZpbGUgaXMgbm90IHVuZGVyIHZlcnNpb24gY29udHJvbCIpPC9kaXY+PGRpdj4m bmJzcDsgdmMtZGVkdWNlLWZpbGVzZXQtMSh0IG5pbCBuaWwpPC9kaXY+PGRpdj4mbmJzcDsg dmMtZGVkdWNlLWZpbGVzZXQodCk8L2Rpdj48ZGl2PiZuYnNwOyB2Yy1wdWxsKCk8L2Rpdj48 ZGl2PiZuYnNwOyAuLi4uLi48L2Rpdj48ZGl2Pjxicj48L2Rpdj48ZGl2PkFmdGVyIHNvbWUg ZWRlYnVnIGRlYnVnZ2luZyBhbmQgcmVhZGluZyB0aGUgc291cmNlIGNvZGUsIEkgZm91bmQg dGhhdDwvZGl2PjxkaXY+dGhpcyBlcnJvciBvY2N1cnMgaWYgdGhlIGJ1ZmZlciB3aGVyZSBg cGFja2FnZS12Yy11cGdyYWRlJyBpcyBjYWxsZWQgaXM8L2Rpdj48ZGl2Pm5vdCB1bmRlciBh IGdpdCByZXBvc2l0b3J5LiBBZGRpdGlvbmFsbHksIGlmIHRoZSBjdXJyZW50IGJ1ZmZlciBv ZiB0aGU8L2Rpdj48ZGl2PmNvbW1hbmQgaW52b2NhdGlvbiBkb2VzIG5vdCBjb3JyZXNwb25k IHRvIGEgc3BlY2lmaWMgZmlsZSwgdGhlbiB0aGU8L2Rpdj48ZGl2PmNvbW1hbmQgY2FuIGV4 ZWN1dGUgbm9ybWFsbHkuPC9kaXY+PGRpdj48YnI+PC9kaXY+PGRpdj5BZnRlciByZWFkaW5n IHRoZSBpbXBsZW1lbnRhdGlvbiBvZiBgcGFja2FnZS12Yy11cGdyYWRlJywgSSBmb3VuZCB0 aGF0IGl0PC9kaXY+PGRpdj5iaW5kcyBgZGVmYXVsdC1kaXJlY3RvcnknIHRvIHRoZSBwYWNr YWdlJ3MgcGF0aC4gSG93ZXZlciwgdGhlIGludGVybmFsbHk8L2Rpdj48ZGl2PmNhbGxlZCBg dmMtcHVsbCcgZnVuY3Rpb24sIHdoaWNoIHVzZXMgYHZjLWRlZHVjZS1maWxlc2V0LTEnLCBm aXJzdDwvZGl2PjxkaXY+dXRpbGl6ZXMgYGJ1ZmZlci1maWxlLW5hbWUnIGluc3RlYWQgb2Yg YGRlZmF1bHQtZGlyZWN0b3J5JyB0byBmZXRjaDwvZGl2PjxkaXY+dmVyc2lvbiBjb250cm9s IGJhY2tlbmQgcmVsYXRlZCBpbmZvcm1hdGlvbiwgd2hpY2ggbGVhZHMgdG8gdGhpcyBlcnJv ci48L2Rpdj48ZGl2Pjxicj48L2Rpdj48ZGl2PkluIG15IHBhc3QgdXNhZ2UsIEkgZGlkIG5v dCBlbmNvdW50ZXIgdGhpcyBlcnJvciwgcHJvYmFibHkgYmVjYXVzZSBJPC9kaXY+PGRpdj51 c3VhbGx5IGludm9rZWQgaXQgd2l0aGluIGEgZmlsZSBidWZmZXIgdW5kZXIgYSBnaXQgcmVw b3NpdG9yeSwgb3IgdXNlZDwvZGl2PjxkaXY+dGhlIGNvbW1hbmQgaW4gYSBidWZmZXIgcHJv dmlkZWQgYnkgYGxpc3QtcGFja2FnZXMnLiBIZXJlIGlzIG9uZTwvZGl2PjxkaXY+c29sdXRp b24gSSB1c2VkOjwvZGl2PjxkaXY+PGJyPjwvZGl2PjxkaXY+KHdoZW4gKGVxIGVtYWNzLW1h am9yLXZlcnNpb24gMjkpPC9kaXY+PGRpdj4mbmJzcDsgKGRlZnVuIHl5L3BhY2thZ2UtdmMt dXBncmFkZS1hZHZpY2UgKHVwZnVuIHBrZy1kZXNjKTwvZGl2PjxkaXY+Jm5ic3A7ICZuYnNw OyAod2l0aC10ZW1wLWJ1ZmZlcjwvZGl2PjxkaXY+Jm5ic3A7ICZuYnNwOyAmbmJzcDsgKGZ1 bmNhbGwgdXBmdW4gcGtnLWRlc2MpKSk8L2Rpdj48ZGl2PiZuYnNwOyAoYWR2aWNlLWFkZCAn cGFja2FnZS12Yy11cGdyYWRlIDphcm91bmQgJ3l5L3BhY2thZ2UtdmMtdXBncmFkZS1hZHZp Y2UpKTwvZGl2PjxkaXY+PGJyPjwvZGl2PjxkaXY+SW4gYSBtaW5pbWFsIGVudmlyb25tZW50 IHdpdGggZW1hY3MgLVEsIHRoZSBmb2xsb3dpbmcgc3RlcHMgY2FuPC9kaXY+PGRpdj5yZXBy b2R1Y2UgbXkgaXNzdWU6PC9kaXY+PGRpdj48YnI+PC9kaXY+PGRpdj47OyBhIHNpbXBsZSBw YWNrYWdlIGJ5IHB1cmNlbGw8L2Rpdj48ZGl2PihwYWNrYWdlLXZjLWluc3RhbGwgImh0dHBz Oi8vZ2l0aHViLmNvbS9wdXJjZWxsL3VuZmlsbCIpPC9kaXY+PGRpdj47OyB0aGVuIHRyeSB0 byB1cGdyYWRlIGl0IGluIGEgYnVmZmVyIHRoYXQgYnVmZmVyLWZpbGUtbmFtZSBpcyBub3Qg bmlsPC9kaXY+PGRpdj47OyBhbmQgdGhlIGZpbGUgaXMgbm90IHVuZGVyIEdpdCB2ZXJzaW9u IGNvbnRyb2wgc3lzdGVtLjwvZGl2PjxkaXY+TS14IHBhY2thZ2UtdmMtdXBncmFkZSB1bmZp bGwgUkVUPC9kaXY+PGRpdj47OyBub3cgdGhlIGVycm9yIG1heSBvY2N1cnM8L2Rpdj48ZGl2 Pjxicj48L2Rpdj48ZGl2PlJlZ2FyZHM8L2Rpdj48ZGl2Pjxicj48L2Rpdj48ZGl2PllJIFlV RTwvZGl2PjwvZGl2PjxkaXY+PGJyPjwvZGl2Pg== ------=_NextPart_66271416_1A098C70_62CEAD8B-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Apr 23 04:32:20 2024 Received: (at 70526) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Apr 2024 08:32:21 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50750 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rzBZb-0004v0-DC for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 23 Apr 2024 04:32:20 -0400 Received: from mout01.posteo.de ([185.67.36.65]:56047) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rzBZV-0004tJ-JE for 70526@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 23 Apr 2024 04:32:17 -0400 Received: from submission (posteo.de [185.67.36.169]) by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CC6B4240027 for <70526@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 23 Apr 2024 10:31:50 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1713861110; bh=9M7PGwLQB05S8AinGewSAF7k/EIVSQLUWvwahm7XS1U=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:OpenPGP:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version: Content-Type:From; b=pkaMDr2gpdPexJKwH9maky9oI1gXpNFN03eK9GtIGm1tSD02pKR/QVnhBfDUom2uG daDb5k/xyVDJxPXXstZqDEF4umOSKr+3E/0tWm7rphTvbCqU4muxV7t6lC8HO0GQiB /djrehBOpWjOLe9ElcWsArh7f8iSeHXU0DkiZl3YsrNnlRzFL1/iKDkO96A9BA7Gfo YHYkLyXfrILBgkXF23AF0gUyJJBnCF6aYI6sm5VHB1FGKZd9wlUjFtEyKpgPQT4EXb wed9plvRipB8/wvZx8bmwagnBmzsJPGMaBSQmRlziL9zb/LJYXlbsiZfA/PmJWgIa5 gMxFN/6oXnZvA== Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4VNwMV0xVRz9rxK; Tue, 23 Apr 2024 10:31:49 +0200 (CEST) From: Philip Kaludercic To: "Yi Yue" Subject: Re: bug#70526: 29.2; package-vc-upgrade failed with error message "File is not under version control" In-Reply-To: (Yi Yue's message of "Tue, 23 Apr 2024 10:51:18 +0900") References: OpenPGP: id=7126E1DE2F0CE35C770BED01F2C3CC513DB89F66; url="https://keys.openpgp.org/vks/v1/by-fingerprint/7126E1DE2F0CE35C770BED01F2C3CC513DB89F66"; preference=signencrypt Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2024 08:31:49 +0000 Message-ID: <875xw8pjii.fsf@posteo.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=-=-=" X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 70526 Cc: 70526@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain "Yi Yue" writes: > Hi all: > > > I encountered the following Backtrace information when invoking > `package-vc-upgrade'. > > > Debugger entered--Lisp error: (error "File is not under version control") >   error("File is not under version control") >   vc-deduce-fileset-1(t nil nil) >   vc-deduce-fileset(t) >   vc-pull() >   ...... > > > After some edebug debugging and reading the source code, I found that > this error occurs if the buffer where `package-vc-upgrade' is called is > not under a git repository. Additionally, if the current buffer of the > command invocation does not correspond to a specific file, then the > command can execute normally. > > > After reading the implementation of `package-vc-upgrade', I found that it > binds `default-directory' to the package's path. However, the internally > called `vc-pull' function, which uses `vc-deduce-fileset-1', first > utilizes `buffer-file-name' instead of `default-directory' to fetch > version control backend related information, which leads to this error. > > > In my past usage, I did not encounter this error, probably because I > usually invoked it within a file buffer under a git repository, or used > the command in a buffer provided by `list-packages'. Here is one > solution I used: > > > (when (eq emacs-major-version 29) >   (defun yy/package-vc-upgrade-advice (upfun pkg-desc) >     (with-temp-buffer >       (funcall upfun pkg-desc))) >   (advice-add 'package-vc-upgrade :around 'yy/package-vc-upgrade-advice)) Injecting this into package-vc, we get: --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Disposition: inline diff --git a/lisp/emacs-lisp/package-vc.el b/lisp/emacs-lisp/package-vc.el index ef056c7909b..4e88964ecd0 100644 --- a/lisp/emacs-lisp/package-vc.el +++ b/lisp/emacs-lisp/package-vc.el @@ -810,8 +810,9 @@ package-vc-upgrade (remove-hook 'vc-post-command-functions post-upgrade)))))) (add-hook 'vc-post-command-functions post-upgrade) (with-demoted-errors "Failed to fetch: %S" - (let ((default-directory pkg-dir)) - (vc-pull))))) + (with-temp-buffer + (let ((default-directory pkg-dir)) + (vc-pull)))))) (defun package-vc--archives-initialize () "Initialize package.el and fetch package specifications." --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain (or alternatively just binding buffer-file-name to nil after default-directory). but it feels like the fix should happen in vc.el, by being able to communicate that we the file set should be derived from the default directory, and the current file should be ignored... > In a minimal environment with emacs -Q, the following steps can > reproduce my issue: > > > ;; a simple package by purcell > (package-vc-install "https://github.com/purcell/unfill") > ;; then try to upgrade it in a buffer that buffer-file-name is not nil > ;; and the file is not under Git version control system. > M-x package-vc-upgrade unfill RET > ;; now the error may occurs > > > Regards > > > YI YUE -- Philip Kaludercic on peregrine --=-=-=-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Apr 23 06:12:16 2024 Received: (at 70526) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Apr 2024 10:12:16 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51203 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rzD8H-0004Y1-Ui for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 23 Apr 2024 06:12:16 -0400 Received: from out203-205-221-239.mail.qq.com ([203.205.221.239]:46572) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rzD8A-0004V7-LG for 70526@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 23 Apr 2024 06:12:11 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=qq.com; s=s201512; t=1713867094; bh=aWXDjwtbeCRVa4rgU+mcuPeZOv+tuU6Vh+PH0og2eWU=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date; b=f2nsq3zTPI/g4QAMhVpjdNn0Eir1fCBI24wAKPu1qjYyX81hO26m+0utfq+FI7qwE 8XiVHaBEMtq3TLYZNPTl1uCGPeDgm3M1iMrW0ltRbGeEaICbIIAiqm23kSCjqkfF2b OgbnLcPkd/ocUyuwSECy9sK5Wbw4DL4AEZydi1H0= X-QQ-FEAT: oHWrrGTW1dAsGLFenq4sogOoyW13zn73 X-QQ-SSF: 00000000000000F0000000000000 X-QQ-XMRINFO: OWPUhxQsoeAVDbp3OJHYyFg= X-QQ-XMAILINFO: M1JY6XCfJolWG8P2PM3vQwCWBkcjv6EOXa9yHUSkLGPBqZjDl9ZTU75VcQ3U0h 2pcVdiI3rdzyg12Wx8/3xBRSz883yW51f4W0oyWl0EvMilvmKbs9RglTH6fNDXQF2/4XrIbbfkH6d wTIwEKVHP0LZTFjEoQinypddIzx00wnQYDiyEGZe8gUzVfdRTaZUGBYeTydbb4j1HG8nuaT7I+X7W kP8vkSzUH9l7eVS+N5g8quUhLLSiur1oYWCxMYuRUIorROin2+lxZjOupK13ZXi0+SJvY8hBttd6C WT+ZppptyQqrLlL/KntA9pffc/blxy3WP/mHXa2CS28jJ9P8hlEEHSoaSm4she1KH41QF9roSgvgv 9rMuiL2C5a66LN1d2/oP9GtfzBf/z8XpA8EbPcHf/ygyVcYNftW7ibHJ8tp/+VoXdPNP07ToF/jyw ZnvjkfINS0wJ9vH07+PmfwkZl5fL/sGy8rqQu22YfUDtVuiN2r897zPRuFhWolqDD53GHMrkR/tSx YcRZbYOs1TkV1RTjJaBS+n+72hVzHI6Hzw+bbGi8h5RSttxSmxVTgjqqnc5DrIxrkh7cxgL3Use2O nz0Epvg31qU7b4kDXH7GOmwCMSME8BBSf9KnNYyCtJg1FTW7DvhXPQuRdRHoyhXzbMr6vYNz4/2mY FvKVIAPO6mAgIhw7Np2mJVLhQ32mCuLu6LtWOu7hKdiZ5TbWaInxwMk6sArXtEQSNVvRe3BNnG31V pnIAt5TTzLGxKY6GNlKyd47Yvqc7ftUH1Z9NOL289XXR7rzwG8Rd0NG2/YJLRPpco74Ec2W0bFy1u O83TKRQGEJ8aCXlmlSXpLKFAnJ048OIqBCZdbp5oriA4NQosk/mRgxOyujzXnzhL0PlF0awzzcQbs 6l58X4HY1XaXvyU49i877I0Xh8nxMR5iTxOpG0UF6DYihO45Wtksp4SNiKtL3ynWIoB0h2K4rPB2z yL2NN+uHpKJaYJj/zm6xiZ91dSHMQr/wF0FvLIyJZ/ZSOuaYWxdEAnTRyyOOygyTBH0hvDa08zUAF lYjOM X-HAS-ATTACH: no X-QQ-BUSINESS-ORIGIN: 2 X-Originating-IP: 133.9.121.69 X-QQ-STYLE: X-QQ-mid: webmail739t1713867093t1197805 From: "=?ISO-8859-1?B?WWkgWXVl?=" To: "=?ISO-8859-1?B?NzA1MjY=?=" <70526@debbugs.gnu.org> Subject: Re: bug#70526: 29.2; package-vc-upgrade failed with error message "File is not under version control" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_66278955_15B80008_2BA87901" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8Bit Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2024 19:11:33 +0900 X-Priority: 3 Message-ID: X-QQ-MIME: TCMime 1.0 by Tencent X-Mailer: QQMail 2.x X-QQ-Mailer: QQMail 2.x X-Spam-Score: 3.6 (+++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: > (or alternatively just binding buffer-file-name to nil after default-directory). Yes, this is simpler. > but it feels like the fix should happen in vc.el, by being able to > communicate that we the file set should be derived from the default > directory, and the current file should be ignored. [...] Content analysis details: (3.6 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [203.205.221.239 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (include_yy[at]qq.com) 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.0 FROM_EXCESS_BASE64 From: base64 encoded unnecessarily 0.4 RDNS_DYNAMIC Delivered to internal network by host with dynamic-looking rDNS 3.2 HELO_DYNAMIC_IPADDR Relay HELO'd using suspicious hostname (IP addr 1) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 70526 Cc: =?ISO-8859-1?B?cGhpbGlwaw==?= X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 2.6 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: > (or alternatively just binding buffer-file-name to nil after default-directory). Yes, this is simpler. > but it feels like the fix should happen in vc.el, by being able to > communicate that we the file set should be derived from the default > directory, and the current file should be ignored. [...] Content analysis details: (2.6 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [203.205.221.239 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (include_yy[at]qq.com) 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.0 FROM_EXCESS_BASE64 From: base64 encoded unnecessarily 0.4 RDNS_DYNAMIC Delivered to internal network by host with dynamic-looking rDNS 3.2 HELO_DYNAMIC_IPADDR Relay HELO'd using suspicious hostname (IP addr 1) -1.0 MAILING_LIST_MULTI Multiple indicators imply a widely-seen list manager This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_66278955_15B80008_2BA87901 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Jmd0OyAob3IgYWx0ZXJuYXRpdmVseSBqdXN0IGJpbmRpbmcgYnVmZmVyLWZpbGUtbmFtZSB0 byBuaWwgYWZ0ZXIgZGVmYXVsdC1kaXJlY3RvcnkpLg0KDQoNClllcywgdGhpcyBpcyBzaW1w bGVyLg0KDQoNCiZndDsgYnV0IGl0IGZlZWxzIGxpa2UgdGhlIGZpeCBzaG91bGQgaGFwcGVu IGluIHZjLmVsLCBieSBiZWluZyBhYmxlIHRvDQomZ3Q7IGNvbW11bmljYXRlIHRoYXQgd2Ug dGhlIGZpbGUgc2V0IHNob3VsZCBiZSBkZXJpdmVkIGZyb20gdGhlIGRlZmF1bHQNCiZndDsg ZGlyZWN0b3J5LCBhbmQgdGhlIGN1cnJlbnQgZmlsZSBzaG91bGQgYmUgaWdub3JlZC4uLg0K DQoNCk1heWJlIGl0IGlzIGJldHRlciwgYnV0IEkgZG9uJ3Qga25vdyB3aGF0IHdpbGwgaGFw cGVuIGlmIHdlDQpjaGFuZ2UgdGhlIGltcGxlbWVudGF0aW9uIG9mIGB2Yy1kZWR1Y2UtZmls ZXNldC0xJywgSSBkb24ndCBoYXZlDQptdWNoIGtub3dsZWRnZSBvZiB2Yy5lbC4= ------=_NextPart_66278955_15B80008_2BA87901 Content-Type: text/html; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 PG1ldGEgaHR0cC1lcXVpdj0iQ29udGVudC1UeXBlIiBjb250ZW50PSJ0ZXh0L2h0bWw7IGNo YXJzZXQ9R0IxODAzMCI+PGRpdj48ZGl2PiZndDsgKG9yIGFsdGVybmF0aXZlbHkganVzdCBi aW5kaW5nIGJ1ZmZlci1maWxlLW5hbWUgdG8gbmlsIGFmdGVyIGRlZmF1bHQtZGlyZWN0b3J5 KS48L2Rpdj48ZGl2Pjxicj48L2Rpdj48ZGl2PlllcywgdGhpcyBpcyBzaW1wbGVyLjwvZGl2 PjxkaXY+PGJyPjwvZGl2PjxkaXY+Jmd0OyBidXQgaXQgZmVlbHMgbGlrZSB0aGUgZml4IHNo b3VsZCBoYXBwZW4gaW4gdmMuZWwsIGJ5IGJlaW5nIGFibGUgdG88L2Rpdj48ZGl2PiZndDsg Y29tbXVuaWNhdGUgdGhhdCB3ZSB0aGUgZmlsZSBzZXQgc2hvdWxkIGJlIGRlcml2ZWQgZnJv bSB0aGUgZGVmYXVsdDwvZGl2PjxkaXY+Jmd0OyBkaXJlY3RvcnksIGFuZCB0aGUgY3VycmVu dCBmaWxlIHNob3VsZCBiZSBpZ25vcmVkLi4uPC9kaXY+PGRpdj48YnI+PC9kaXY+PGRpdj5N YXliZSBpdCBpcyBiZXR0ZXIsIGJ1dCBJIGRvbid0IGtub3cgd2hhdCB3aWxsIGhhcHBlbiBp ZiB3ZTwvZGl2PjxkaXY+Y2hhbmdlIHRoZSBpbXBsZW1lbnRhdGlvbiBvZiBgdmMtZGVkdWNl LWZpbGVzZXQtMScsIEkgZG9uJ3QgaGF2ZTwvZGl2PjxkaXY+bXVjaCBrbm93bGVkZ2Ugb2Yg dmMuZWwuPC9kaXY+PC9kaXY+PGRpdj48YnI+PC9kaXY+ ------=_NextPart_66278955_15B80008_2BA87901-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Apr 23 15:36:33 2024 Received: (at 70526) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Apr 2024 19:36:34 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53969 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rzLwK-0007u1-BM for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 23 Apr 2024 15:36:32 -0400 Received: from mout01.posteo.de ([185.67.36.65]:60993) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rzLwD-0007rq-Re for 70526@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 23 Apr 2024 15:36:25 -0400 Received: from submission (posteo.de [185.67.36.169]) by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DCB80240028 for <70526@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 23 Apr 2024 21:35:58 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1713900958; bh=SVjbw5MklC0IkyWIFUcIreWPG2P2A4RBOeWQR4DkyZ8=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:OpenPGP:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version: Content-Type:From; b=ig3Wxi1JCmvQ3YvWyZDsBOesZUzccDDSv2inkCwT0v/f5jrMMKsYmM6chTgRQ3XZI MM70zvMptwEvwIxt3qcVKBWAx7XEgXhIyL1Urteazrj3k1ccKqsxMZtNg2ZRpb1Vy9 ZVeTpu2fs1qIC4ua8XJ3eMITooMtBTBwHSTsGGo96Av1GKoG/9lqJSX6sxSYR6G4yk c8Ugbg1CJmAU/XuYQ1OWCP/5bJETsOAiZfAMnHyf6d2WsuDDwQ7jp87W2kXi9+GgQ1 LRhYi91ETLvVRlwk/5IwJsiauMXb3Jw5kfgbnrX0LFKZfitMkQ1AKpTNFzTf48W+gP X/ovgR0MvK6Sw== Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4VPC5p1Zr4z6tvh; Tue, 23 Apr 2024 21:35:58 +0200 (CEST) From: Philip Kaludercic To: "Yi Yue" Subject: Re: bug#70526: 29.2; package-vc-upgrade failed with error message "File is not under version control" In-Reply-To: (Yi Yue's message of "Tue, 23 Apr 2024 19:11:33 +0900") References: OpenPGP: id=7126E1DE2F0CE35C770BED01F2C3CC513DB89F66; url="https://keys.openpgp.org/vks/v1/by-fingerprint/7126E1DE2F0CE35C770BED01F2C3CC513DB89F66"; preference=signencrypt Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2024 19:35:57 +0000 Message-ID: <87pluflvmq.fsf@posteo.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 70526 Cc: 70526 <70526@debbugs.gnu.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) (unrelated, but why do your messages include HTML entities?) "Yi Yue" writes: > > (or alternatively just binding buffer-file-name to nil after default-directory). > > > Yes, this is simpler. My main fear is that this might have some unintended consequences. > > but it feels like the fix should happen in vc.el, by being able to > > communicate that we the file set should be derived from the default > > directory, and the current file should be ignored... > > Maybe it is better, but I don't know what will happen if we > change the implementation of `vc-deduce-fileset-1', I don't have > much knowledge of vc.el. I wouldn't want to rely on my understanding of vc either. While it would be easy to add a dynamic variable to indicate this behaviour, I am careful not to overburden the abstractions that VC provides. -- Philip Kaludercic on peregrine From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Apr 23 17:08:28 2024 Received: (at 70526) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Apr 2024 21:08:29 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54365 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rzNNK-0006xB-AX for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 23 Apr 2024 17:08:28 -0400 Received: from out162-62-57-252.mail.qq.com ([162.62.57.252]:53345) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rzNNE-0006uZ-EX for 70526@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 23 Apr 2024 17:08:24 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=qq.com; s=s201512; t=1713906468; bh=ePl0LMJ7JLzKTLNQBMTVjfifTaRXXMpvMWHD2y6GNLQ=; h=In-Reply-To:References:From:To:Cc:Subject:Date; b=UsKDAH6hAFGB0KhvTOG1la5v3WUW0m1G9BW8z5/q/QK6VlPTR8MjBr2uBmdehfjGu tZa7N5l7mjDjW7Vwfq8jlalRSbD9FHWlz23mZehOzgz090m7+s9uONAMAJ1FCgo3Dy ImNr9+QCRc4AK+t108E4601qIYyenpBslmumFyKM= X-QQ-FEAT: oHWrrGTW1dAsGLFenq4sogOoyW13zn73 X-QQ-SSF: 00000000000000F0000000000000 X-QQ-XMRINFO: Nq+8W0+stu50PRdwbJxPCL0= X-QQ-XMAILINFO: MY3jm67yH+kkntjqZHDkhUibZW9v506o66mng1MZPYCnBXZ1CyiO9fC+/9LEvb qDwG5D+WMRqa9JvjdK44SZbY5hvQdab1Hh690EevwSZPavgeNPjHDqQxEVzh9Q4V263B/wkUkH7uH IjKLQLItmw5LIxVIIqqoQX1p76jGeZhJ7xJQFb/IAut8QsYfn+tl4GYKc93dQNA30Tth3hG+fO6nN d8Fb1fWiQzRw2rXZvj6NDxgGIB2nSbW747O9l7j0wBC6JSMif7PlXeVdM6NKwN81e0HK2t3ZjHsWg FW5ADrf/amO+/ppZWUpwLnewqy60Pt7OQR5M1rgAY8zceJ69qG38NFl3PWV1Yeb3LslEUw68sdpDG X65NIHnsUVBu1yTZezJQtmVX77eNeJ6PeXkUfLTUWfa08tA+XOiUai8inP6y4N6AOZA2DqwtkJUns /QIoerBHbNwjnNljyzhBJxEmn3g6wNl5np/2Q8I/rIBmYEaap3AXjZm/5rIRXX8YpkZr50PXgoSvr h6xnzIg5ynoMPJkLr1aTezCdAtCmWsVKSCswWz7XWuQWQaDfYIFuxyL4G0q3FMqrdHVQqIwo7rBkO A0163aHr3Te88tsxaHGYwwaUQABoUPr5xUo4mny/ZsNzSAiQYpsGtAvXxG2TzTq/Cycs0zVNCyd1H k2IKg25yt/3tHUHpraoFVjueS03GhmwnabErBK01VlEeiJtp4cCRYWuD1aU1e8rkI1y5FU1LztcwO s3vOdv31LNqA38TDoBFjIAPs1R5F2BFAVAPRXAL4cGlL/wfIFO6clgX8PDDAG7A9xZU5Bq1MXrwdr zgqk53nOSwtSa7WeZ+hNnUjvcr6YT2R1DMSApF5bhxwkQLlbdEkiDK6f+plZ1f3rlFoXv4oRCDul6 I09JA78c5jSl/uochMZeu7bee+Z3aSNMLDA/emwxUBxpJXdNoXjdz2Q1NQNw17c03KRbmN2LWWU8f Yj5YOe8aRuIpp2eI6V X-HAS-ATTACH: no X-QQ-BUSINESS-ORIGIN: 2 X-Originating-IP: 119.175.143.156 In-Reply-To: <87pluflvmq.fsf@posteo.net> References: <87pluflvmq.fsf@posteo.net> X-QQ-STYLE: X-QQ-mid: webmail739t1713906468t5502586 From: "=?ISO-8859-1?B?WWkgWXVl?=" To: "=?ISO-8859-1?B?UGhpbGlwIEthbHVkZXJjaWM=?=" Subject: Re: bug#70526: 29.2; package-vc-upgrade failed with error message "File is not under version control" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_66282323_12E663A8_73BE2026" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8Bit Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2024 06:07:47 +0900 X-Priority: 3 Message-ID: X-QQ-MIME: TCMime 1.0 by Tencent X-Mailer: QQMail 2.x X-QQ-Mailer: QQMail 2.x X-Spam-Score: 3.6 (+++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: > (unrelated, but why do your messages include HTML entities?) (Sorry, I forgot to forbid the default formatter of my email client.) > My main fear is that this might have some unintended conseq [...] Content analysis details: (3.6 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [162.62.57.252 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3 RBL: Good reputation (+3) [162.62.57.252 listed in wl.mailspike.net] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (include_yy[at]qq.com) 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record 0.0 T_TVD_MIME_EPI BODY: No description available. 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL Mailspike good senders 0.0 FROM_EXCESS_BASE64 From: base64 encoded unnecessarily 0.4 RDNS_DYNAMIC Delivered to internal network by host with dynamic-looking rDNS 3.2 HELO_DYNAMIC_IPADDR Relay HELO'd using suspicious hostname (IP addr 1) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 70526 Cc: =?ISO-8859-1?B?NzA1MjY=?= <70526@debbugs.gnu.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 2.6 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: > (unrelated, but why do your messages include HTML entities?) (Sorry, I forgot to forbid the default formatter of my email client.) > My main fear is that this might have some unintended conseq [...] Content analysis details: (2.6 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [162.62.57.252 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3 RBL: Good reputation (+3) [162.62.57.252 listed in wl.mailspike.net] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (include_yy[at]qq.com) 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record 0.0 T_TVD_MIME_EPI BODY: No description available. 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL Mailspike good senders 0.0 FROM_EXCESS_BASE64 From: base64 encoded unnecessarily 0.4 RDNS_DYNAMIC Delivered to internal network by host with dynamic-looking rDNS 3.2 HELO_DYNAMIC_IPADDR Relay HELO'd using suspicious hostname (IP addr 1) -1.0 MAILING_LIST_MULTI Multiple indicators imply a widely-seen list manager This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_66282323_12E663A8_73BE2026 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Jmd0OyAodW5yZWxhdGVkLCBidXQgd2h5IGRvIHlvdXIgbWVzc2FnZXMgaW5jbHVkZSBIVE1M IGVudGl0aWVzPykgKFNvcnJ5LCBJIGZvcmdvdCB0byBmb3JiaWQgdGhlIGRlZmF1bHQgZm9y bWF0dGVyIG9mIG15IGVtYWlsIGNsaWVudC4pICZndDsgTXkgbWFpbiBmZWFyIGlzIHRoYXQg dGhpcyBtaWdodCBoYXZlIHNvbWUgdW5pbnRlbmRlZCBjb25zZXF1ZW5jZXMuIE9mIGNvdXJz ZS4gJmd0OyBJIHdvdWxkbid0IHdhbnQgdG8gcmVseSBvbiBteSB1bmRlcnN0YW5kaW5nIG9m IHZjIGVpdGhlci4gIFdoaWxlIGl0ICZndDsgd291bGQgYmUgZWFzeSB0byBhZGQgYSBkeW5h bWljIHZhcmlhYmxlIHRvIGluZGljYXRlIHRoaXMgYmVoYXZpb3VyLCBJIGFtICZndDsgY2Fy ZWZ1bCBub3QgdG8gb3ZlcmJ1cmRlbiB0aGUgYWJzdHJhY3Rpb25zIHRoYXQgVkMgcHJvdmlk ZXMuIFVuZGVyc3RhbmQuIEkgcmVhZCB0aGUgZG9jc3RyaW5nIG9mIGB2Yy1wdWxsJywgd2hp Y2ggaXMgdXNlZCBieSBgcGFja2FnZS12Yy11cGdyYWRlJy4gSXQgc2F5czogLS0tLS0tLS0t LS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0t LS0tLS0tLS0tLS0gICAiVXBkYXRlIHRoZSBjdXJyZW50IGZpbGVzZXQgb3IgYnJhbmNoLiBZ b3UgbXVzdCBiZSB2aXNpdGluZyBhIHZlcnNpb24gY29udHJvbGxlZCBmaWxlLCBvciBpbiBh IGB2Yy1kaXInIGJ1ZmZlci4gLi4uIiAtLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0t LS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLSBCdXQgYHZjLWRp cicgaXMgYSB1c2VyIGNvbW1hbmQgb3RoZXIgdGhhbiBhIGZ1bmN0aW9uLCBpdCB3aWxsIG9w ZW4gYSAgbmV3IGJ1ZmZlciBhbmQgcmV0dXJuIG5pbC4gSW4gY29uc2lkZXJhdGlvbiBvZiB0 aGUgZmFjdCB0aGF0IGB2Yy1wdWxsJyAgaXMgYW4gYXN5bmMgZnVuY3Rpb24sIGl0IGlzIG5v dCBlYXN5IGZvciB1cyB0byBraWxsIHRoZSBgdmMtZGlmZicgYnVmZmVyICByaWdodCBhZnRl ciB0aGUgcHVsbCBvcGVyYXRpb24uIEFzIHlvdSBzdWdnZXN0ZWQgZWFybGllciwgbWF5YmUg d2UgbmVlZCB0byBtb2RpZnkgdmMuZWwsIG1ha2luZyB0aGUgcmVzdHJpY3Rpb24gbG9vc2Vy PyAgQWxzbywgSSBub3RpY2VkIHRoYXQgdGhlIG1haW50YWluZXIgYmluZCBgZGVmYXVsdC1k aXJlY3RvcnknIGluIHRoaXMgY29tbWl0OiBodHRwczovL2dpdGh1Yi5jb20vZW1hY3MtbWly cm9yL2VtYWNzL2NvbW1pdC83YWI1NTZiNTc2MzFjYjI4ZGI4NmI4OWJhMjk2YmMwNTk5ZDlh Mzk5IEltcHJvdmUgcm9idXN0bmVzcyBvZiAncGFja2FnZS12Yy11cGRhdGUnIFJlZ2FyZHM= ------=_NextPart_66282323_12E663A8_73BE2026 Content-Type: text/html; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Jmd0OyAodW5yZWxhdGVkLCBidXQgd2h5IGRvIHlvdXIgbWVzc2FnZXMgaW5jbHVkZSBIVE1M IGVudGl0aWVzPykKCihTb3JyeSwgSSBmb3Jnb3QgdG8gZm9yYmlkIHRoZSBkZWZhdWx0IGZv cm1hdHRlciBvZiBteSBlbWFpbCBjbGllbnQuKQoKJmd0OyBNeSBtYWluIGZlYXIgaXMgdGhh dCB0aGlzIG1pZ2h0IGhhdmUgc29tZSB1bmludGVuZGVkIGNvbnNlcXVlbmNlcy4KCk9mIGNv dXJzZS4KCiZndDsgSSB3b3VsZG4ndCB3YW50IHRvIHJlbHkgb24gbXkgdW5kZXJzdGFuZGlu ZyBvZiB2YyBlaXRoZXIuICBXaGlsZSBpdAomZ3Q7IHdvdWxkIGJlIGVhc3kgdG8gYWRkIGEg ZHluYW1pYyB2YXJpYWJsZSB0byBpbmRpY2F0ZSB0aGlzIGJlaGF2aW91ciwgSSBhbQomZ3Q7 IGNhcmVmdWwgbm90IHRvIG92ZXJidXJkZW4gdGhlIGFic3RyYWN0aW9ucyB0aGF0IFZDIHBy b3ZpZGVzLgoKVW5kZXJzdGFuZC4KCkkgcmVhZCB0aGUgZG9jc3RyaW5nIG9mIGB2Yy1wdWxs Jywgd2hpY2ggaXMgdXNlZCBieSBgcGFja2FnZS12Yy11cGdyYWRlJy4gSXQgc2F5czoKCi0t LS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0t LS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tCiAgIlVwZGF0ZSB0aGUgY3VycmVudCBmaWxlc2V0IG9yIGJy YW5jaC4KWW91IG11c3QgYmUgdmlzaXRpbmcgYSB2ZXJzaW9uIGNvbnRyb2xsZWQgZmlsZSwg b3IgaW4gYSBgdmMtZGlyJyBidWZmZXIuCi4uLiIKLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0t LS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0KCkJ1 dCBgdmMtZGlyJyBpcyBhIHVzZXIgY29tbWFuZCBvdGhlciB0aGFuIGEgZnVuY3Rpb24sIGl0 IHdpbGwgb3BlbiBhIApuZXcgYnVmZmVyIGFuZCByZXR1cm4gbmlsLiBJbiBjb25zaWRlcmF0 aW9uIG9mIHRoZSBmYWN0IHRoYXQgYHZjLXB1bGwnIAppcyBhbiBhc3luYyBmdW5jdGlvbiwg aXQgaXMgbm90IGVhc3kgZm9yIHVzIHRvIGtpbGwgdGhlIGB2Yy1kaWZmJyBidWZmZXIgCnJp Z2h0IGFmdGVyIHRoZSBwdWxsIG9wZXJhdGlvbi4KCkFzIHlvdSBzdWdnZXN0ZWQgZWFybGll ciwgbWF5YmUgd2UgbmVlZCB0byBtb2RpZnkgdmMuZWwsIG1ha2luZwp0aGUgcmVzdHJpY3Rp b24gbG9vc2VyPyAKCkFsc28sIEkgbm90aWNlZCB0aGF0IHRoZSBtYWludGFpbmVyIGJpbmQg YGRlZmF1bHQtZGlyZWN0b3J5JyBpbiB0aGlzIGNvbW1pdDoKCmh0dHBzOi8vZ2l0aHViLmNv bS9lbWFjcy1taXJyb3IvZW1hY3MvY29tbWl0LzdhYjU1NmI1NzYzMWNiMjhkYjg2Yjg5YmEy OTZiYzA1OTlkOWEzOTkKSW1wcm92ZSByb2J1c3RuZXNzIG9mICdwYWNrYWdlLXZjLXVwZGF0 ZScKClJlZ2FyZHM= ------=_NextPart_66282323_12E663A8_73BE2026-- mai From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Apr 23 22:01:15 2024 Received: (at 70526) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Apr 2024 02:01:16 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55601 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rzRwf-0007JD-BW for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 23 Apr 2024 22:01:15 -0400 Received: from out203-205-221-205.mail.qq.com ([203.205.221.205]:59862) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rzRwX-0007FW-I3 for 70526@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 23 Apr 2024 22:01:12 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=qq.com; s=s201512; t=1713924033; bh=AD0/yJLtypBns2oP0rshn+Q7dQSXHoa0R9Fs7/2peu4=; h=In-Reply-To:References:From:To:Cc:Subject:Date; b=LopQgt9L/Aw2uU5nSS9S2+Tixhd8mon/jmkHz9bmSfFRHVEe3i9NHEwL3W4y/MXlT yPQX6zQZSkq/Lv846LnhULgMT+sU3nRnz9tJTeJDbpkCtYzRS1ANgQbj4X9SbfDZcR 3S7DcdpZwpUtWwoYO/35OyOuD5drshvNPGs6sPVA= X-QQ-FEAT: oHWrrGTW1dAsGLFenq4sogOoyW13zn73 X-QQ-SSF: 00000000000000F0000000000000 X-QQ-XMRINFO: NyFYKkN4Ny6FSmKK/uo/jdU= X-QQ-XMAILINFO: Mu4fz8q1FCY33TiGjgKM3U+xVlxvy/brjAGhy6opqCjsC/3nus06bydOTOn15j yF4dD4jHOLfTHAc0EsBiFdHumZd4QK6BmQvTicfriTIcxk+kvgASnxmjnGkebek82fPW53SO1qBDn wa2uJrD8Iz1x06SKL8q8ObQD/Bp705SL3PyRPKwC2dgGjVnKnNX3xXLngsHk94h3nZubcV7+5lYzr T8pHYagSaTi0T0ckgTub4dpVJ3oyt6RdM2gXoBwC+g4g+gW41MPfBMbndp1l4WF/sJmtvbUtBRKAM qbo66cK/UY+WGJQoVmxiyErJu422LOqJjXdJ6j0IUHpcUrTB4lV7IvRN4X65Q/X/wwhjdGsWDNQBd 2WpPLX/euVZcOeferWpBVxXbEC1638sH/AT5AA7OAtYRc5znTky65cuF65/qlJMvdpF41vlUQkkHU YL3fuJAMZdDNbwEvPg4ibY2JM5ZDZHl/Q5pQzwqddMIAsKu3aXaqLV6lakdYNOaifNpT3pKHvDsr8 G13fTBQTJCF1myo1rvENDy+47V0y1VdzAHK/Xmnb7D+5pDkUpaGopxs/d6wrIOjkIRbzWMifsokUL btV2C9wKHl2wV4fU84AE1ouKzO1sgoiXRrFAFI06YUAJUOqc7Ktl+aTQCLSEIXxEWYotl8qgmdl57 i6rIp5lEl8HPCnW01+fSZ6IYI+DMf6jGd18g0ZZV2txzkwKq7dnOrehLW+2N4LKIqGH+Tt80yR3E7 Ck77RwW8O3Nl/Bsg3q+/0+xQXa2D1Ce0NL0Sld5GBXc5vWaZEvyBoPBR/T/z2rhkS5B9G2lTY8Wxd 5omnubFLhIOS0lu1yr9RS0e9CEjgzyaw7RcEiqn1aNimcPQw+E6PlqLWg83dNHM47hpWH2mDxoEnu LnYKoMxS2ircu15w0cpe0989YRy+092LSbHSMzxo/dXZu6WgbdE7XxrQVVq/kd3s96ZmtIgf8jM45 I8JjYLKmFnjw4PLwyny/Z2p1r6Wm/pNvZRV+166WGN9u9Y/WFr X-HAS-ATTACH: no X-QQ-BUSINESS-ORIGIN: 2 X-Originating-IP: 133.9.120.18 In-Reply-To: <87pluflvmq.fsf@posteo.net> References: <87pluflvmq.fsf@posteo.net> X-QQ-STYLE: X-QQ-mid: webmail739t1713924032t7428106 From: "=?ISO-8859-1?B?WWkgWXVl?=" To: "=?ISO-8859-1?B?UGhpbGlwIEthbHVkZXJjaWM=?=" Subject: Re: bug#70526: 29.2; package-vc-upgrade failed with error message "File is not under version control" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_662867C0_131E93C0_7CAC203E" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8Bit Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2024 11:00:32 +0900 X-Priority: 3 Message-ID: X-QQ-MIME: TCMime 1.0 by Tencent X-Mailer: QQMail 2.x X-QQ-Mailer: QQMail 2.x X-Spam-Score: 3.6 (+++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: (sorry for the format problem again) > (unrelated, but why do your messages include HTML entities?) (Sorry, I forgot to forbid the default formatter of my email client.) > My main fear is that t [...] Content analysis details: (3.6 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [203.205.221.205 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3 RBL: Good reputation (+3) [203.205.221.205 listed in wl.mailspike.net] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (include_yy[at]qq.com) 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL Mailspike good senders 0.0 FROM_EXCESS_BASE64 From: base64 encoded unnecessarily 0.4 RDNS_DYNAMIC Delivered to internal network by host with dynamic-looking rDNS 3.2 HELO_DYNAMIC_IPADDR Relay HELO'd using suspicious hostname (IP addr 1) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 70526 Cc: =?ISO-8859-1?B?NzA1MjY=?= <70526@debbugs.gnu.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 2.6 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: (sorry for the format problem again) > (unrelated, but why do your messages include HTML entities?) (Sorry, I forgot to forbid the default formatter of my email client.) > My main fear is that t [...] Content analysis details: (2.6 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [203.205.221.205 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3 RBL: Good reputation (+3) [203.205.221.205 listed in wl.mailspike.net] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (include_yy[at]qq.com) 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL Mailspike good senders 0.0 FROM_EXCESS_BASE64 From: base64 encoded unnecessarily 0.4 RDNS_DYNAMIC Delivered to internal network by host with dynamic-looking rDNS 3.2 HELO_DYNAMIC_IPADDR Relay HELO'd using suspicious hostname (IP addr 1) -1.0 MAILING_LIST_MULTI Multiple indicators imply a widely-seen list manager This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_662867C0_131E93C0_7CAC203E Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 KHNvcnJ5IGZvciB0aGUgZm9ybWF0IHByb2JsZW0gYWdhaW4pICZndDsgKHVucmVsYXRlZCwg YnV0IHdoeSBkbyB5b3VyIG1lc3NhZ2VzIGluY2x1ZGUgSFRNTCBlbnRpdGllcz8pICAoU29y cnksIEkgZm9yZ290IHRvIGZvcmJpZCB0aGUgZGVmYXVsdCBmb3JtYXR0ZXIgb2YgbXkgZW1h aWwgY2xpZW50LikgJmd0OyBNeSBtYWluIGZlYXIgaXMgdGhhdCB0aGlzIG1pZ2h0IGhhdmUg c29tZSB1bmludGVuZGVkIGNvbnNlcXVlbmNlcy4gIE9mIGNvdXJzZS4gICZndDsgSSB3b3Vs ZG4ndCB3YW50IHRvIHJlbHkgb24gbXkgdW5kZXJzdGFuZGluZyBvZiB2YyBlaXRoZXIuIFdo aWxlIGl0ICAmZ3Q7IHdvdWxkIGJlIGVhc3kgdG8gYWRkIGEgZHluYW1pYyB2YXJpYWJsZSB0 byBpbmRpY2F0ZSB0aGlzIGJlaGF2aW91ciwgSSBhbSAgJmd0OyBjYXJlZnVsIG5vdCB0byBv dmVyYnVyZGVuIHRoZSBhYnN0cmFjdGlvbnMgdGhhdCBWQyBwcm92aWRlcy4gIFVuZGVyc3Rh bmQuICBJIHJlYWQgdGhlIGRvY3N0cmluZyBvZiBgdmMtcHVsbCcsIHdoaWNoIGlzIHVzZWQg YnkgYHBhY2thZ2UtdmMtdXBncmFkZScuICBJdCBzYXlzOiAgLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0t LS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0t LS0gICJVcGRhdGUgdGhlIGN1cnJlbnQgZmlsZXNldCBvciBicmFuY2guICBZb3UgbXVzdCBi ZSB2aXNpdGluZyBhIHZlcnNpb24gY29udHJvbGxlZCBmaWxlLCBvciBpbiBhIGB2Yy1kaXIn IGJ1ZmZlci4gIC4uLiIgLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0t LS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0gIEJ1dCBgdmMtZGlyJyBpcyBh IHVzZXIgY29tbWFuZCBvdGhlciB0aGFuIGEgZnVuY3Rpb24sIGl0IHdpbGwgb3BlbiBhIG5l dyBidWZmZXIgYW5kIHJldHVybiBuaWwuICBJbiBjb25zaWRlcmF0aW9uIG9mIHRoZSBmYWN0 IHRoYXQgYHZjLXB1bGwnIGlzIGFuIGFzeW5jIGZ1bmN0aW9uLCBpdCBpcyBub3QgZWFzeSBm b3IgdXMgdG8gIGtpbGwgdGhlIGB2Yy1kaWZmJyBidWZmZXIgcmlnaHQgYWZ0ZXIgdGhlIHB1 bGwgb3BlcmF0aW9uLiAgQXMgeW91IHN1Z2dlc3RlZCBlYXJsaWVyLCBtYXliZSB3ZSBuZWVk IHRvIG1vZGlmeSB2Yy5lbCwgbWFraW5nIHRoZSByZXN0cmljdGlvbiBsb29zZXI/ICBBbHNv LCBJIG5vdGljZWQgdGhhdCB0aGUgbWFpbnRhaW5lciBiaW5kIGBkZWZhdWx0LWRpcmVjdG9y eScgaW4gdGhpcyBjb21taXQ6ICBodHRwczovL2dpdGh1Yi5jb20vZW1hY3MtbWlycm9yL2Vt YWNzL2NvbW1pdC83YWI1NTZiNTc2MzFjYjI4ZGI4NmI4OWJhMjk2YmMwNTk5ZDlhMzk5ICBJ bXByb3ZlIHJvYnVzdG5lc3Mgb2YgJ3BhY2thZ2UtdmMtdXBkYXRlJyBSZWdhcmRz ------=_NextPart_662867C0_131E93C0_7CAC203E Content-Type: text/html; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 PG1ldGEgaHR0cC1lcXVpdj0iQ29udGVudC1UeXBlIiBjb250ZW50PSJ0ZXh0L2h0bWw7IGNo YXJzZXQ9R0IxODAzMCI+PHByZT4oc29ycnkgZm9yIHRoZSBmb3JtYXQgcHJvYmxlbSBhZ2Fp bikKCiZndDsgKHVucmVsYXRlZCwgYnV0IHdoeSBkbyB5b3VyIG1lc3NhZ2VzIGluY2x1ZGUg SFRNTCBlbnRpdGllcz8pIAoKKFNvcnJ5LCBJIGZvcmdvdCB0byBmb3JiaWQgdGhlIGRlZmF1 bHQgZm9ybWF0dGVyIG9mIG15IGVtYWlsIGNsaWVudC4pCgomZ3Q7IE15IG1haW4gZmVhciBp cyB0aGF0IHRoaXMgbWlnaHQgaGF2ZSBzb21lIHVuaW50ZW5kZWQgY29uc2VxdWVuY2VzLiAK Ck9mIGNvdXJzZS4gCgomZ3Q7IEkgd291bGRuJ3Qgd2FudCB0byByZWx5IG9uIG15IHVuZGVy c3RhbmRpbmcgb2YgdmMgZWl0aGVyLiBXaGlsZSBpdCAKJmd0OyB3b3VsZCBiZSBlYXN5IHRv IGFkZCBhIGR5bmFtaWMgdmFyaWFibGUgdG8gaW5kaWNhdGUgdGhpcyBiZWhhdmlvdXIsIEkg YW0gCiZndDsgY2FyZWZ1bCBub3QgdG8gb3ZlcmJ1cmRlbiB0aGUgYWJzdHJhY3Rpb25zIHRo YXQgVkMgcHJvdmlkZXMuIAoKVW5kZXJzdGFuZC4gCgpJIHJlYWQgdGhlIGRvY3N0cmluZyBv ZiBgdmMtcHVsbCcsIHdoaWNoIGlzIHVzZWQgYnkgYHBhY2thZ2UtdmMtdXBncmFkZScuIApJ dCBzYXlzOiAKCi0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0t LS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tIAoiVXBkYXRlIHRoZSBjdXJyZW50IGZp bGVzZXQgb3IgYnJhbmNoLiAKWW91IG11c3QgYmUgdmlzaXRpbmcgYSB2ZXJzaW9uIGNvbnRy b2xsZWQgZmlsZSwgb3IgaW4gYSBgdmMtZGlyJyBidWZmZXIuIAouLi4iCi0tLS0tLS0tLS0t LS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0t LS0tLS0tLS0tIAoKQnV0IGB2Yy1kaXInIGlzIGEgdXNlciBjb21tYW5kIG90aGVyIHRoYW4g YSBmdW5jdGlvbiwgaXQgd2lsbCBvcGVuIGEgbmV3IGJ1ZmZlciBhbmQgcmV0dXJuIG5pbC4g CkluIGNvbnNpZGVyYXRpb24gb2YgdGhlIGZhY3QgdGhhdCBgdmMtcHVsbCcgaXMgYW4gYXN5 bmMgZnVuY3Rpb24sIGl0IGlzIG5vdCBlYXN5IGZvciB1cyB0byAKa2lsbCB0aGUgYHZjLWRp ZmYnIGJ1ZmZlciByaWdodCBhZnRlciB0aGUgcHVsbCBvcGVyYXRpb24uIAoKQXMgeW91IHN1 Z2dlc3RlZCBlYXJsaWVyLCBtYXliZSB3ZSBuZWVkIHRvIG1vZGlmeSB2Yy5lbCwgbWFraW5n IHRoZSByZXN0cmljdGlvbiBsb29zZXI/IAoKQWxzbywgSSBub3RpY2VkIHRoYXQgdGhlIG1h aW50YWluZXIgYmluZCBgZGVmYXVsdC1kaXJlY3RvcnknIGluIHRoaXMgY29tbWl0OiAKCmh0 dHBzOi8vZ2l0aHViLmNvbS9lbWFjcy1taXJyb3IvZW1hY3MvY29tbWl0LzdhYjU1NmI1NzYz MWNiMjhkYjg2Yjg5YmEyOTZiYzA1OTlkOWEzOTkgCkltcHJvdmUgcm9idXN0bmVzcyBvZiAn cGFja2FnZS12Yy11cGRhdGUnIFJlZ2FyZHMKPC9wcmU+ ------=_NextPart_662867C0_131E93C0_7CAC203E-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Apr 24 02:20:37 2024 Received: (at 70526) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Apr 2024 06:20:39 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56705 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rzVzY-00075x-6a for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 24 Apr 2024 02:20:36 -0400 Received: from mout02.posteo.de ([185.67.36.66]:40727) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rzVyq-0006zR-9n for 70526@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 24 Apr 2024 02:19:51 -0400 Received: from submission (posteo.de [185.67.36.169]) by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D47FA240103 for <70526@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 24 Apr 2024 08:19:20 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1713939560; bh=NU6xWYLzVungnBL9lbxb/yO2pYLGZRDevjmtzQjsxrs=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:OpenPGP:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version: Content-Type:From; b=kVaXBUTxbQg5hexAAiIDFj+WqBnsZYGR3KKukLhsNxyROLjneazP+iT6TxQxz3QZR TEPeKWlKulYB3J6lfuuNNk3ZBmhYBKWFmdJNdsG5mDxADd2s4jbF8YIHRRFOeMeWO1 Iy9P8bOTm+DM4eB51vNuC7jcthq34Bwr1crDtoJtJzZBkLwQ2vTWOH2CwwfqXiNHBR hezuQd0N36c6J0mn8Fj/n9rCIy0nAgDK+H2HpoHyIYZ35Tq91/9dxUSsYIK5f2ZPd3 9vC+KuA3HbWuE709hSIYZpi6vt6Ij/1vqFuzm9MneEWA+QvMoalEnBDMSf3EJClyFm RW8i2udro7K2Q== Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4VPTN81nnWz9rxB; Wed, 24 Apr 2024 08:19:20 +0200 (CEST) From: Philip Kaludercic To: "Yi Yue" Subject: Re: bug#70526: 29.2; package-vc-upgrade failed with error message "File is not under version control" In-Reply-To: (Yi Yue's message of "Wed, 24 Apr 2024 11:00:32 +0900") References: <87pluflvmq.fsf@posteo.net> OpenPGP: id=7126E1DE2F0CE35C770BED01F2C3CC513DB89F66; url="https://keys.openpgp.org/vks/v1/by-fingerprint/7126E1DE2F0CE35C770BED01F2C3CC513DB89F66"; preference=signencrypt Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2024 06:19:19 +0000 Message-ID: <87bk5zl1ug.fsf@posteo.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=-=-=" X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 70526 Cc: 70526 <70526@debbugs.gnu.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain "Yi Yue" writes: >> (unrelated, but why do your messages include HTML entities?) > > (Sorry, I forgot to forbid the default formatter of my email client.) it appears more or less correctly when I view the HTML message, so don't worry. >> My main fear is that this might have some unintended consequences. > > Of course. > >> I wouldn't want to rely on my understanding of vc either. While it >> would be easy to add a dynamic variable to indicate this behaviour, I am >> careful not to overburden the abstractions that VC provides. > > Understand. > > I read the docstring of `vc-pull', which is used by `package-vc-upgrade'. > It says: > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > "Update the current fileset or branch. > You must be visiting a version controlled file, or in a `vc-dir' buffer. > ..." > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > But `vc-dir' is a user command other than a function, it will open a new buffer and return nil. > In consideration of the fact that `vc-pull' is an async function, it is not easy for us to > kill the `vc-diff' buffer right after the pull operation. This actually gives us another possibility how to tackle the issue: --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Disposition: inline diff --git a/lisp/emacs-lisp/package-vc.el b/lisp/emacs-lisp/package-vc.el index ef056c7909b..c29e8b5d738 100644 --- a/lisp/emacs-lisp/package-vc.el +++ b/lisp/emacs-lisp/package-vc.el @@ -774,6 +774,9 @@ package-vc-upgrade-all (package-vc-upgrade pkg-desc)))) (message "Done upgrading packages.")) +(declare-function vc-dir-prepare-status-buffer "vc-dir" + (bname dir backend &optional create-new)) + ;;;###autoload (defun package-vc-upgrade (pkg-desc) "Upgrade the package described by PKG-DESC from package's VC repository. @@ -810,7 +813,10 @@ package-vc-upgrade (remove-hook 'vc-post-command-functions post-upgrade)))))) (add-hook 'vc-post-command-functions post-upgrade) (with-demoted-errors "Failed to fetch: %S" - (let ((default-directory pkg-dir)) + (require 'vc-dir) + (with-current-buffer (vc-dir-prepare-status-buffer + (format " *vc-dir: %s*" pkg-dir) + pkg-dir (vc-responsible-backend pkg-dir)) (vc-pull))))) (defun package-vc--archives-initialize () --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain I am actually satisfied with this approach, and it seems reliable. > > As you suggested earlier, maybe we need to modify vc.el, making the restriction looser? If you can, try out the above patch and tell me if you end up having any issues, otherwise I don't think we need to adjust vc. > Also, I noticed that the maintainer bind `default-directory' in this commit: > > https://github.com/emacs-mirror/emacs/commit/7ab556b57631cb28db86b89ba296bc0599d9a399 > Improve robustness of 'package-vc-update' Regards FYI that was my change, GitHub just doesn't display commit names by default: https://github.com/emacs-mirror/emacs/commit/7ab556b57631cb28db86b89ba296bc0599d9a399.patch -- Philip Kaludercic on peregrine --=-=-=-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Apr 24 03:03:39 2024 Received: (at 70526) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Apr 2024 07:03:40 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56887 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rzWfH-0005Qu-Pv for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 24 Apr 2024 03:03:39 -0400 Received: from out162-62-57-210.mail.qq.com ([162.62.57.210]:37129) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rzWf2-0005NT-3z for 70526@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 24 Apr 2024 03:03:31 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=qq.com; s=s201512; t=1713942163; bh=4fbtR+W8xRECP80JpnUeFq+raAnyEzg/BS8VHom5Tow=; h=In-Reply-To:References:From:To:Cc:Subject:Date; b=Qo1+dP8kAjx/PYJlYypZXZcxi1z1awPZY5ZZ8fz9sKuq+c8UOK7vTE1kheLp7jzxD fsCkhtE/Vz3Pis6dLi9w34wDGW6gSah4A0OHkYO1yl4xakUkvpEyLMVQETpE235iVh pPGK3ERH058aBd7kuwx5WNlhNPOTHrlRpM4uqi+8= X-QQ-FEAT: oHWrrGTW1dAsGLFenq4sogOoyW13zn73 X-QQ-SSF: 00000000000000F0000000000000 X-QQ-XMRINFO: NI4Ajvh11aEj8Xl/2s1/T8w= X-QQ-XMAILINFO: NKvGkmu+zWvN7f+lzmuULScTSKJdj7fY6cLlhqvuP5FdRvrmpBu9l3Lz/ujofW f2xZElbrWyp6iew0GsLbwwuvX7n7Ijv/bkrYBxFxDBuycC0tzvxNQOYa10d/YnyvGY/P/DhjvmxMb pUnevToCMD7K6IofxHUJ3mlh2rXU6OObDfk89y9i1sE2IEwVP2arFkURcRGjjzfdEUoL9XsUi0qs2 JGaDT4kdRj4EOAj9u2SMG+5SZZ/Rl9AFLBqufZw5QuzsuNXEwk94fQqJuB3bDj16JpqQjzJ7mobOk a65bxnF+AAfB3n2QQDj4gNnXmny77ll4hDT0jzry5f8m3rdk0IH30e8cAUYiPswNxYirBYfiv7QFC Sf3URhWIBI585d+ugt/JcHbbmWdlKlJxt630wvhqY+H/ET2UfZl1uCwQaAHpVRs30YnIWx4yDoBoC MKU/8wdmEIDbIy+IoVwDzARLZZF79R6SyQMD1WvWQn0fbV85iDiPpdPQ2awWcGFXSzIq3sFDqzpXn B8xJYC0r0I5SoFr71vSnXlkiKzgRM0hPpnTgc7T8LtzPe5x2s4e2qJqLMGq5aQXVO+uYSXtHq4Cim UrUTlS1LmdH3LCXLcRNQZ8xVNbv+SSdXIIX0DhOT0yAreXZpQJbLQ8YezdEWJ9DGQdchmUjWR1a/0 XHpjsvGjMYbWfOP90MGm9lYdN/R9ifQWu1hGu4imJ+8yuxP06wj0ETc5+uwfjILio3d3+kOVoaXZj Lkbyv58nl5r9eF1GbE5U1ANMQWwDqeQo+OZyiuiJ531MQVHMsJATVuC7gdINFBZOJ0tdNBjSL8BPB lKuh+kStVToZLfMcTFv6s2bmluhPjxPDytRQHr/k0s2jhYt+t+j3g7terL37otMVybvMT5GUwrz36 twfM7ga27xBmDscgacIDlimciNCsxX4omRN4MV94FsNnMf0QkRJm6gkVb0PE5M1LXdOLVQnBTkRKj yzuCcS+257dqVmbcKDvpZqXjdx/ys74g6p1E8CWVkCIZajKV7uT+RMOt//wSikDyHxU4q66GP94oa iAZDurQKPJ9SESi/vjoLgxEdiMe5sqpLMF2dX X-HAS-ATTACH: no X-QQ-BUSINESS-ORIGIN: 2 X-Originating-IP: 133.9.120.18 In-Reply-To: <87bk5zl1ug.fsf@posteo.net> References: <87pluflvmq.fsf@posteo.net> <87bk5zl1ug.fsf@posteo.net> X-QQ-STYLE: X-QQ-mid: webmail739t1713942163t5014104 From: "=?ISO-8859-1?B?WWkgWXVl?=" To: "=?ISO-8859-1?B?UGhpbGlwIEthbHVkZXJjaWM=?=" Subject: Re: bug#70526: 29.2; package-vc-upgrade failed with error message "File is not under version control" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_6628AE93_12871688_149D8656" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8Bit Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2024 16:02:42 +0900 X-Priority: 3 Message-ID: X-QQ-MIME: TCMime 1.0 by Tencent X-Mailer: QQMail 2.x X-QQ-Mailer: QQMail 2.x X-Spam-Score: 3.6 (+++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: > I am actually satisfied with this approach, and it seems reliable. > > > > As you suggested earlier, maybe we need to modify vc.el, making the restriction looser? > If you can, try [...] Content analysis details: (3.6 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [162.62.57.210 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3 RBL: Good reputation (+3) [162.62.57.210 listed in wl.mailspike.net] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (include_yy[at]qq.com) 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL Mailspike good senders 0.0 FROM_EXCESS_BASE64 From: base64 encoded unnecessarily 0.4 RDNS_DYNAMIC Delivered to internal network by host with dynamic-looking rDNS 3.2 HELO_DYNAMIC_IPADDR Relay HELO'd using suspicious hostname (IP addr 1) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 70526 Cc: =?ISO-8859-1?B?NzA1MjY=?= <70526@debbugs.gnu.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 2.6 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: > I am actually satisfied with this approach, and it seems reliable. > > > > As you suggested earlier, maybe we need to modify vc.el, making the restriction looser? > If you can, try [...] Content analysis details: (2.6 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [162.62.57.210 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3 RBL: Good reputation (+3) [162.62.57.210 listed in wl.mailspike.net] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (include_yy[at]qq.com) 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL Mailspike good senders 0.0 FROM_EXCESS_BASE64 From: base64 encoded unnecessarily 0.4 RDNS_DYNAMIC Delivered to internal network by host with dynamic-looking rDNS 3.2 HELO_DYNAMIC_IPADDR Relay HELO'd using suspicious hostname (IP addr 1) -1.0 MAILING_LIST_MULTI Multiple indicators imply a widely-seen list manager This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_6628AE93_12871688_149D8656 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Jmd0OyBJIGFtIGFjdHVhbGx5IHNhdGlzZmllZCB3aXRoIHRoaXMgYXBwcm9hY2gsIGFuZCBp dCBzZWVtcyByZWxpYWJsZS4gJmd0OyAmZ3Q7ICZndDsgJmd0OyBBcyB5b3Ugc3VnZ2VzdGVk IGVhcmxpZXIsIG1heWJlIHdlIG5lZWQgdG8gbW9kaWZ5IHZjLmVsLCBtYWtpbmcgdGhlIHJl c3RyaWN0aW9uIGxvb3Nlcj8gJmd0OyBJZiB5b3UgY2FuLCB0cnkgb3V0IHRoZSBhYm92ZSBw YXRjaCBhbmQgdGVsbCBtZSBpZiB5b3UgZW5kIHVwIGhhdmluZyBhbnkgJmd0OyBpc3N1ZXMs IG90aGVyd2lzZSBJIGRvbid0IHRoaW5rIHdlIG5lZWQgdG8gYWRqdXN0IHZjLiBZZXMsIGl0 IHdvcmtzIGFzIGV4cGVjdGVkLCB0aGFua3MuIEJ1dCBub3cgaXQgd2lsbCBjcmVhdGUgYW4g YWRkaXRpb25hbCBlbXB0eSBidWZmZXIgbmFtZWQgIntwa2d9KiIsIHtwa2d9IGlzIHRoZSBu YW1lIG9mIHBhY2FrZ2UuIFNvIEkgc3VnZ2VzdCB0aGUgZm9sbG93aW5nIGNvZGU6IC0tLS0t LS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0t LS0tLS0tLSAod2l0aC1kZW1vdGVkLWVycm9ycyAiRmFpbGVkIHRvIGZldGNoOiAlUyIgICAo cmVxdWlyZSAndmMtZGlyKSAgIChsZXQgKCh2Y2J1ZiAodmMtZGlyLXByZXBhcmUtc3RhdHVz LWJ1ZmZlciAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgKGZvcm1hdCAiICp2Yy1kaXI6ICVzKiIgcGtnLWRp cikgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgIHBrZy1kaXIgKHZjLXJlc3BvbnNpYmxlLWJhY2tlbmQgcGtn LWRpcikpKSkgICAgICh1bndpbmQtcHJvdGVjdCAJKHdpdGgtY3VycmVudC1idWZmZXIgdmNi dWYgICAgICAgICAgICh2Yy1wdWxsKSkgICAgICAgKGtpbGwtYnVmZmVyIHZjYnVmKSkpKSAt LS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0t LS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tIEFueXdheSwgSSB0aGluayB0aGlzIGJ1ZmZlciBkb2Vzbid0IG1hdHRl ci4gQm90aCBhcmUgT0suIFJlZ2FyZHMgWWkgWXVl ------=_NextPart_6628AE93_12871688_149D8656 Content-Type: text/html; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 PG1ldGEgaHR0cC1lcXVpdj0iQ29udGVudC1UeXBlIiBjb250ZW50PSJ0ZXh0L2h0bWw7IGNo YXJzZXQ9R0IxODAzMCI+PHByZT4mZ3Q7IEkgYW0gYWN0dWFsbHkgc2F0aXNmaWVkIHdpdGgg dGhpcyBhcHByb2FjaCwgYW5kIGl0IHNlZW1zIHJlbGlhYmxlLgoKJmd0OyAmZ3Q7CiZndDsg Jmd0OyBBcyB5b3Ugc3VnZ2VzdGVkIGVhcmxpZXIsIG1heWJlIHdlIG5lZWQgdG8gbW9kaWZ5 IHZjLmVsLCBtYWtpbmcgdGhlIHJlc3RyaWN0aW9uIGxvb3Nlcj8KCiZndDsgSWYgeW91IGNh biwgdHJ5IG91dCB0aGUgYWJvdmUgcGF0Y2ggYW5kIHRlbGwgbWUgaWYgeW91IGVuZCB1cCBo YXZpbmcgYW55CiZndDsgaXNzdWVzLCBvdGhlcndpc2UgSSBkb24ndCB0aGluayB3ZSBuZWVk IHRvIGFkanVzdCB2Yy4KClllcywgaXQgd29ya3MgYXMgZXhwZWN0ZWQsIHRoYW5rcy4gQnV0 IG5vdyBpdCB3aWxsIGNyZWF0ZSBhbgphZGRpdGlvbmFsIGVtcHR5IGJ1ZmZlciBuYW1lZCAi e3BrZ30qIiwge3BrZ30gaXMgdGhlIG5hbWUgb2YgcGFjYWtnZS4KU28gSSBzdWdnZXN0IHRo ZSBmb2xsb3dpbmcgY29kZToKCi0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0t LS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLQood2l0aC1kZW1vdGVkLWVycm9ycyAi RmFpbGVkIHRvIGZldGNoOiAlUyIKICAocmVxdWlyZSAndmMtZGlyKQogIChsZXQgKCh2Y2J1 ZiAodmMtZGlyLXByZXBhcmUtc3RhdHVzLWJ1ZmZlcgogICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgKGZvcm1h dCAiICp2Yy1kaXI6ICVzKiIgcGtnLWRpcikKICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgIHBrZy1kaXIgKHZj LXJlc3BvbnNpYmxlLWJhY2tlbmQgcGtnLWRpcikpKSkKICAgICh1bndpbmQtcHJvdGVjdAoJ KHdpdGgtY3VycmVudC1idWZmZXIgdmNidWYKICAgICAgICAgICh2Yy1wdWxsKSkKICAgICAg KGtpbGwtYnVmZmVyIHZjYnVmKSkpKQotLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0t LS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tCgpBbnl3YXksIEkgdGhpbmsg dGhpcyBidWZmZXIgZG9lc24ndCBtYXR0ZXIuIEJvdGggYXJlIE9LLgoKUmVnYXJkcwoKWWkg WXVlCjwvcHJlPg== ------=_NextPart_6628AE93_12871688_149D8656-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Apr 24 03:52:23 2024 Received: (at 70526) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Apr 2024 07:52:24 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57077 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rzXQU-0003k1-V8 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 24 Apr 2024 03:52:23 -0400 Received: from mout01.posteo.de ([185.67.36.65]:55987) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rzXQQ-0003iA-So for 70526@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 24 Apr 2024 03:52:20 -0400 Received: from submission (posteo.de [185.67.36.169]) by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 99D5C240027 for <70526@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 24 Apr 2024 09:51:55 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1713945115; bh=XCFPBUWHV7bCA46tmh66lyNuHbTLAR2swskR0kj+/rQ=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:OpenPGP:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version: Content-Type:From; b=VsS5pIuY6MaMINVB+ZcC47q943dm5jszmuohNGGIdCJBnPMmynXZbj2LP5Xp/3JtI bHbGwtLZ2P1peof0svj6JWKOHporJ+I2ukz4PWLEN1pygJOuUTaEgqYGW/9Mkls7uM YyaEh1+EJ8Nu7yd5XhuoqI5hdlX+uPeWKrlQ1HH7y35yRwUI1CnpVB+BIq+95i5h9S 0fleSjS6oIjztJLL9ZGVJFZ49bOCMKOcWkcOK5IrkQa7iJ64H+sLjjvzJt3UbEq/jl Y54j3VUF/WY6cvipyZbKG/R2VYzaBAzWgz88t0AgCbKFm3UU0CoRvDH9zNHUABR6+H 9xiCGoaeO/aKg== Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4VPWQz1YDPz9rxK; Wed, 24 Apr 2024 09:51:55 +0200 (CEST) From: Philip Kaludercic To: "Yi Yue" Subject: Re: bug#70526: 29.2; package-vc-upgrade failed with error message "File is not under version control" In-Reply-To: (Yi Yue's message of "Wed, 24 Apr 2024 16:02:42 +0900") References: <87pluflvmq.fsf@posteo.net> <87bk5zl1ug.fsf@posteo.net> OpenPGP: id=7126E1DE2F0CE35C770BED01F2C3CC513DB89F66; url="https://keys.openpgp.org/vks/v1/by-fingerprint/7126E1DE2F0CE35C770BED01F2C3CC513DB89F66"; preference=signencrypt Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2024 07:51:54 +0000 Message-ID: <877cgnkxk5.fsf@posteo.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 70526 Cc: 70526 <70526@debbugs.gnu.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) "Yi Yue" writes: >> > >> > As you suggested earlier, maybe we need to modify vc.el, making the restriction looser? > >> If you can, try out the above patch and tell me if you end up having any >> issues, otherwise I don't think we need to adjust vc. > > Yes, it works as expected, thanks. But now it will create an > additional empty buffer named "{pkg}*", {pkg} is the name of pacakge. > So I suggest the following code: > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > (with-demoted-errors "Failed to fetch: %S" > (require 'vc-dir) > (let ((vcbuf (vc-dir-prepare-status-buffer > (format " *vc-dir: %s*" pkg-dir) > pkg-dir (vc-responsible-backend pkg-dir)))) > (unwind-protect > (with-current-buffer vcbuf > (vc-pull)) > (kill-buffer vcbuf)))) > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Anyway, I think this buffer doesn't matter. Both are OK. As the buffer is hidden, I didn't see the need to clean it up. It can be re-used later on and might help with debugging. > Regards > > Yi Yue -- Philip Kaludercic on peregrine From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Apr 24 04:10:11 2024 Received: (at 70526) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Apr 2024 08:10:12 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57149 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rzXhg-0006mA-Hh for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 24 Apr 2024 04:10:11 -0400 Received: from out203-205-221-164.mail.qq.com ([203.205.221.164]:36821) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rzXhV-0006iW-Gh for 70526@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 24 Apr 2024 04:10:06 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=qq.com; s=s201512; t=1713946159; bh=+vTu3Uy/TGeRTBkdD7+ZKKPZKdpR5EfgclXYyAOqkKs=; h=In-Reply-To:References:From:To:Cc:Subject:Date; b=BxzmCvCxhygVMI3GVgBvf8hElIJZDMCOrwD4soZVh9qm6HXLQoPXBC/mnkAEl1dkl ngpXuU+yCYvVe2R+D6cP4TdnXNVHMgIjgMoRfwT2al/4PvjVlsyY1aWyKgozmhIRRe hNGVruVLr2wyDYpWZswlix58H/lE4WKSjS5Up8Ko= X-QQ-FEAT: oHWrrGTW1dAsGLFenq4sogOoyW13zn73 X-QQ-SSF: 00000000000000F0000000000000 X-QQ-XMRINFO: OD9hHCdaPRBwq3WW+NvGbIU= X-QQ-XMAILINFO: M3dQO3ujtPYebh0sZDQwpULj3ler2834iNTZQsfa6sfEelQcUzHOcrSM5D/O+4 XUkX5kOJZ00GZW5hYLOCzbdCcwzZvTt/xLxvxN2hEHUBJyU6iiOb1sff/x/SPsLxpQtZuT7SR/BVA o/m8zlWhkHEkIY8344oDOoK/05UMwOVVkaHilBy8Kx4+M1ymNCAapHdzLg0x95MxSolMnDQMZnKUX 95jwxH8Mxq/xIbWeu94dosELK4OiGPsLauE66zrleim2cnaKn37VOSvRrkPiL7TWuUuE+LkAHBala yHyQtNb4aanfEVhAsDvh5mqvaWQB3/snvvZVbrj58G7w1PCNAYENZRMNiUFg/fTex+poQ42+CXUEu 5tF/H2Z4HB37TbR0kD/fbZb/F0r09K34oxdJrtnRqLM1RRnADx8Pg+HfG0FvVh/lyzJoijgZTjZHL HYpsEuJsMu6s1VIDCPi8SIlRNNHIqPqyAi7v4g81JlWd6hkbf2elp1J/+S+Lie9piWp4LmZEkm/YI KO3+T4ddigpGd8XFk+iUCoPTDaZ9EXNyQJ4PbZJ+6irgkf4yFElBGf79Cz4LpUUiGKOEBK5XEGvc6 drCDZ8Z7X00/qmIy0w7uxUJJk/GAG3HlGCf9dblTDf7UEX+0ylCxFBSFuiMXUMu/F1QMi8t1wLPGj gq296RaG8UPcqP88zpSve4OdzvWmo/06+9PX709lbP3bVRiqcPbQkP76RQyf/0a+QUgeOSAVt7YtL NUVsnc61H1/QVcq9AapWblBM+8unm3dSf5n0CagNMf0aKDwRQY+C2iXjcszMzaXkwH7ZPCLJbPisz OoAbes+Tn5UdvxAmWRM7YFpDh+weOOofSl6hS19GJdVxB8yKK/GqAWBclQeU60BPe/cY8c3BVoOlL KVB9xnFgUNgNDQqp6oAL1e0qjyK9kBInJZ1cpDUqDEdVeKf8IsW2Q6RX1oP1BwVwoShha6D/W+40O tFGBcQmn2pKqTRHyoktIRDb4Q6qdzYqjTToKcZKnYP8NiP+6WvD9ziPi5jZAOMqaViVKqVhyc50Xo a5/XSrBq/cjlG4dzzzop6hBxqU5DYZTVgkLZaWrZM9Ur7RvN3HX0nUpldPw== X-HAS-ATTACH: no X-QQ-BUSINESS-ORIGIN: 2 X-Originating-IP: 133.9.120.18 In-Reply-To: <877cgnkxk5.fsf@posteo.net> References: <87pluflvmq.fsf@posteo.net> <87bk5zl1ug.fsf@posteo.net> <877cgnkxk5.fsf@posteo.net> X-QQ-STYLE: X-QQ-mid: webmail739t1713946158t2340188 From: "=?gb18030?B?bzBvMG+6xNfT?=" To: "=?gb18030?B?UGhpbGlwIEthbHVkZXJjaWM=?=" Subject: Re: bug#70526: 29.2; package-vc-upgrade failed with error message "File is not under version control" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_6628BE2E_17C4B180_2EE8437C" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8Bit Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2024 17:09:18 +0900 X-Priority: 3 Message-ID: X-QQ-MIME: TCMime 1.0 by Tencent X-Mailer: QQMail 2.x X-QQ-Mailer: QQMail 2.x X-Spam-Score: 3.6 (+++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: > As the buffer is hidden, I didn't see the need to clean it up. It can > be re-used later on and might help with debugging. I think you are right. Now we fix this bug. Regards > As the buffer is hidden, I didn't see the need to clean it up. It can > be re-used later on and might help with debugging. I think you are right. Now we fix this bug. Regards Content analysis details: (3.6 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [203.205.221.164 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4 RBL: Very Good reputation (+4) [203.205.221.164 listed in wl.mailspike.net] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (include_yy[at]qq.com) 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL Mailspike good senders 0.4 RDNS_DYNAMIC Delivered to internal network by host with dynamic-looking rDNS 3.2 HELO_DYNAMIC_IPADDR Relay HELO'd using suspicious hostname (IP addr 1) 0.0 NO_FM_NAME_IP_HOSTN No From name + hostname using IP address X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 70526 Cc: =?gb18030?B?NzA1MjY=?= <70526@debbugs.gnu.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 2.6 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: > As the buffer is hidden, I didn't see the need to clean it up. It can > be re-used later on and might help with debugging. I think you are right. Now we fix this bug. Regards > As the buffer is hidden, I didn't see the need to clean it up. It can > be re-used later on and might help with debugging. I think you are right. Now we fix this bug. Regards Content analysis details: (2.6 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [203.205.221.164 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4 RBL: Very Good reputation (+4) [203.205.221.164 listed in wl.mailspike.net] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (include_yy[at]qq.com) 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL Mailspike good senders 0.4 RDNS_DYNAMIC Delivered to internal network by host with dynamic-looking rDNS 3.2 HELO_DYNAMIC_IPADDR Relay HELO'd using suspicious hostname (IP addr 1) -1.0 MAILING_LIST_MULTI Multiple indicators imply a widely-seen list manager This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_6628BE2E_17C4B180_2EE8437C Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb18030" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Jmd0OyBBcyB0aGUgYnVmZmVyIGlzIGhpZGRlbiwgSSBkaWRuJ3Qgc2VlIHRoZSBuZWVkIHRv IGNsZWFuIGl0IHVwLiAgSXQgY2FuICZndDsgYmUgcmUtdXNlZCBsYXRlciBvbiBhbmQgbWln aHQgaGVscCB3aXRoIGRlYnVnZ2luZy4gSSB0aGluayB5b3UgYXJlIHJpZ2h0LiBOb3cgd2Ug Zml4IHRoaXMgYnVnLiBSZWdhcmRz ------=_NextPart_6628BE2E_17C4B180_2EE8437C Content-Type: text/html; charset="gb18030" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 PG1ldGEgaHR0cC1lcXVpdj0iQ29udGVudC1UeXBlIiBjb250ZW50PSJ0ZXh0L2h0bWw7IGNo YXJzZXQ9R0IxODAzMCI+PHByZT4mZ3Q7IEFzIHRoZSBidWZmZXIgaXMgaGlkZGVuLCBJIGRp ZG4ndCBzZWUgdGhlIG5lZWQgdG8gY2xlYW4gaXQgdXAuICBJdCBjYW4KJmd0OyBiZSByZS11 c2VkIGxhdGVyIG9uIGFuZCBtaWdodCBoZWxwIHdpdGggZGVidWdnaW5nLgoKSSB0aGluayB5 b3UgYXJlIHJpZ2h0LgoKTm93IHdlIGZpeCB0aGlzIGJ1Zy4KClJlZ2FyZHMKPC9wcmU+ ------=_NextPart_6628BE2E_17C4B180_2EE8437C-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Apr 27 03:28:52 2024 Received: (at 70526-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Apr 2024 07:28:52 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38835 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1s0cUM-0004C7-KC for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 27 Apr 2024 03:28:52 -0400 Received: from mout02.posteo.de ([185.67.36.66]:48649) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1s0cUH-0004A6-63 for 70526-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 27 Apr 2024 03:28:49 -0400 Received: from submission (posteo.de [185.67.36.169]) by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4B67B240103 for <70526-done@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 27 Apr 2024 09:28:20 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1714202900; bh=nHVXra2JE0fpu88WbKy2lmSjZKsBfo9vgRIvr9zWaW8=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:OpenPGP:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:From; b=LMdCyGn6TRx94KKQ7KAWbF0Wd3qSZEy/0hQOLO1omifatz+8vO1tGfboJv9/QC2tS /X3FAnpgTZ7pWs7w+JxiJN117lLp299F88cgM+DJO1PNXY56gzDSlVAQeILqBRoAZh LrspB0+5wNFVBY7eMPrPpZj9bixvD/5xKMI5h2nXJR7KH++f0yN3Kn7xbPonvXDZyD a829zOX9+q5ls8ONQpJU9hkM7wW/p/e5x3VmZmE+eb9Tb7OXQ1TrkAnmflbqMwKF/U jFVzhZNUhjlrmSN0NAfIUKdnojG2DWZbSpLIokpYaZiRq41d90DKiR0HqMbGyG4Fxh yy7KbXKhds5KA== Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4VRLmM4RNMz6trs; Sat, 27 Apr 2024 09:28:19 +0200 (CEST) From: Philip Kaludercic To: =?utf-8?B?bzBvMG/ogJflrZA=?= Subject: Re: bug#70526: 29.2; package-vc-upgrade failed with error message "File is not under version control" In-Reply-To: (=?utf-8?B?Im8wbzBv6ICX5a2Q?= "'s message of "Wed, 24 Apr 2024 17:09:18 +0900") References: <87pluflvmq.fsf@posteo.net> <87bk5zl1ug.fsf@posteo.net> <877cgnkxk5.fsf@posteo.net> OpenPGP: id=7126E1DE2F0CE35C770BED01F2C3CC513DB89F66; url="https://keys.openpgp.org/vks/v1/by-fingerprint/7126E1DE2F0CE35C770BED01F2C3CC513DB89F66"; preference=signencrypt Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2024 07:28:19 +0000 Message-ID: <87frv7s1rg.fsf@posteo.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 70526-done Cc: 70526 <70526-done@debbugs.gnu.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) "o0o0o=E8=80=97=E5=AD=90" writes: > > As the buffer is hidden, I didn't see the need to clean it up. > It can > be re-used later on and might help with debugging. I think > you are right. Now we fix this bug. Regards I have pushed the changes, and will therefore close this bug report. Thank you for your help! --=20 Philip Kaludercic on peregrine From unknown Wed Jun 18 23:07:43 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Sat, 25 May 2024 11:24:08 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator