GNU bug report logs - #70478
30.0.50; [PATCH] Fix treesitter-font-lock-settings for built-in functions and attributes.

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: Prateek Sharma <ps.prateek.sharma143 <at> gmail.com>
To: Yuan Fu <casouri <at> gmail.com>
Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>, 70478 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#70478: 30.0.50; [PATCH] Fix treesitter-font-lock-settings for built-in functions and attributes.
Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2024 10:46:44 +0530

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Well, I think emacs-29 also needs this fix.

There is one other fix with indentation in python-ts-mode that is needed in
emacs-29. But it's already fixed in emacs-30 as I've tested.

On Sun, Apr 21, 2024 at 9:17 AM Yuan Fu <casouri <at> gmail.com> wrote:

>
>
> > On Apr 20, 2024, at 12:53 AM, Prateek Sharma <
> ps.prateek.sharma143 <at> gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Here is the patch for the squashed commit and updated code. Thanks for
> helping me out!
> >
> >
> > On Sat, Apr 20, 2024 at 1:11 PM Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> wrote:
> > > From: Prateek Sharma <ps.prateek.sharma143 <at> gmail.com>
> > > Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2024 12:25:24 +0530
> > > Cc: Yuan Fu <casouri <at> gmail.com>, 70478 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> > >
> > > Also should I squash the changes of both the above commits into one
> and then create a patch file?
> >
> > You should squash, yes.  Other than that, attaching the patches as you
> > did is fine.
> >
> > Thanks.
> > <0001-Fix-treesitter-font-lock-settings-for-built-in-funct.patch>
>
> Thanks! Should I apply this to master or emacs-29? It’s a fix so I think
> emacs-29?
>
> Yuan

[Message part 2 (text/html, inline)]

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.