GNU bug report logs - #70456
Request for merging "core-updates" branch

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: Guillaume Le Vaillant <glv <at> posteo.net>
To: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>
Cc: Steve George <steve <at> futurile.net>, ludo <at> gnu.org, mail <at> cbaines.net, Lars-Dominik Braun <lars <at> 6xq.net>, efraim <at> flashner.co.il, 70456 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#70456: Request for merging core-updates branch
Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2024 20:19:45 +0000

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com> skribis:

> Hi,
>
> Guillaume Le Vaillant <glv <at> posteo.net> writes:
>
>> Lars-Dominik Braun <lars <at> 6xq.net> skribis:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> it seems the core-updates branch is first in the merge-queue. haskell-team
>>> was successfully built by the CI and is ready to be merged. Since there
>>> does not seem to be an ETA for core-updates, can I skip the queue and
>>> go ahead with merging haskell-team?
>>>
>>> Lars
>>
>> Hi.
>> The lisp-team branch is also in a good shape and ready to be merged.
>
> I think it's fine to merge these first; perhaps the core-updates merge
> request should be removed if it was preposterous (usually we issue the
> merge request when we are confident the branch is ready to me merged).

Hi.

It might be more logical to have two steps. First a "work started on
xyz-team branch" message to indicate to the QA to make the stats for
this branch, and then the "request for merging xyz-team branch" message
to put the branch in the merge queue.

I'll try to merge the lisp-team branch tomorrow (UTC+2 timezone).

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.