GNU bug report logs - #7035
Savannah Emacs page fixes

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: Stefan Monnier <monnier <at> IRO.UMontreal.CA>
Cc: rgm <at> gnu.org, 7035 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#7035: Savannah Emacs page fixes
Date: Sat, 18 Sep 2010 11:09:44 +0200

> From: Stefan Monnier <monnier <at> IRO.UMontreal.CA>
> Date: Sat, 18 Sep 2010 10:14:31 +0200
> Cc: 7035 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> 
> >>> http://savannah.gnu.org/mail/?group=emacs
> >> 
> >>> 1) Any reason not to add the help-emacs-windows and gnu-emacs-sources
> >>> lists?
> >> 
> >> This page is auto-generated. So to add those lists, we'd have to
> >> change them into standard lists managed by lists.gnu.org.
> 
> > But they are standard lists.gnu.org lists:
> 
> > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-emacs-windows
> > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-emacs-sources
> 
> > AFAIK, there is no difference between these and eg bug-gnu-emacs.
> 
> I guess savannah hasn't been made aware that these belong to the
> `emacs' project.
> 
> >>> 2) The "to post a message" comment is inappropriate for the lists:
> >>> emacs-bug-tracker, emacs-diffs, and info-gnu-emacs.
> >> Again, this is auto-generated,
> > Oh well, I thought it might be.
> 
> Actually, the problem is that mailing-list configuration has only
> "public" and "private" settings which control how easily one can
> subscribe, but it doesn't have any settings about who can send email to
> that list.

So what's the conclusion regarding these lists?  Should I add them or
not?  If you want them added, just say so.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.