Subject: bug#7030: more info

From: David Reitter <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2011 08:50:14 +0100

On Dec 20, 2011, at 7:49 AM, Jan D. wrote:
> 
> I'm not a copyrights expert, but if some parts aren't assigned to FSF, should not the files (nsmenu.m, nsterm.m in this case) have another Copyright statement besides the one for FSF?

It may make sense, though I think that one can hold copyright without asserting it explicitly.  I think that may depend on jurisdiction.