GNU bug report logs - #70233
[PATCH] Update emacs-lsp-mode to 9.0.0

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Nicolas Goaziou <mail <at> nicolasgoaziou.fr>
Cc: tracker <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#70233: closed ([PATCH] Update emacs-lsp-mode to 9.0.0)
Date: Sat, 06 Apr 2024 15:11:02 +0000

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Your message dated Sat, 06 Apr 2024 17:10:16 +0200
with message-id <877cha7civ.fsf <at> nicolasgoaziou.fr>
and subject line Re: [bug#70233] [PATCH] Update emacs-lsp-mode to 9.0.0
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #70233,
regarding [PATCH] Update emacs-lsp-mode to 9.0.0
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs <at> gnu.org.)


-- 
70233: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=70233
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems

[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Apoorv <apoorvs <at> tuta.io>
To: Guix Patches <guix-patches <at> gnu.org>
Subject: [PATCH] Update emacs-lsp-mode to 9.0.0
Date: Sat, 6 Apr 2024 08:49:40 +0200 (CEST)

[Message part 3 (text/plain, inline)]

lsp-mode got a update recently https://github.com/emacs-lsp/lsp-mode/releases/tag/9.0.0, which fixes this issue  that I was facing. So I am sharing a patch for the update.

-- 
 Sent with Tuta; enjoy secure & ad-free emails: 
 https://tuta.com

[Message part 4 (text/html, inline)]

[0001-Update-emacs-lsp-mode-to-9.0.0.patch (text/x-patch, attachment)]

[Message part 6 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Nicolas Goaziou <mail <at> nicolasgoaziou.fr>
To: Apoorv via Guix-patches via <guix-patches <at> gnu.org>
Cc: 70233-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Apoorv <apoorvs <at> tuta.io>
Subject: Re: [bug#70233] [PATCH] Update emacs-lsp-mode to 9.0.0
Date: Sat, 06 Apr 2024 17:10:16 +0200

Hello,

Apoorv via Guix-patches via <guix-patches <at> gnu.org> writes:

> lsp-mode got a update recently
> https://github.com/emacs-lsp/lsp-mode/releases/tag/9.0.0, which fixes
> this issue  that I was facing. So I am sharing a patch for the update.

Thank you.

I used the "9.0.0" tag instead of a random commit hash, and normalized
commit message.

Applied!

Regards,
-- 
Nicolas Goaziou

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.