GNU bug report logs -
#70231
Performance issue on sort with zero-sized pseudo files
Previous Next
Full log
View this message in rfc822 format
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Hi,
I have found a performance issue with the sort command when used on
pseudo files with zero size. For instance, sorting `/proc/kallsyms`, as
demonstrated below, takes significantly longer than executing with
`cat`, generating numerous temporary files. I confirmed this issue on
v8.32 as well as on commit 8f3989d in the master branch.
$ time cat /proc/kallsyms | sort > /dev/null
real 0m0.954s
user 0m0.873s
sys 0m0.096s
$ time sort /proc/kallsyms > /dev/null
real 0m8.555s
user 0m3.367s
sys 0m5.064s
$ strace -e trace=openat sort /proc/kallsyms 2>&1 > /dev/null \
| grep /tmp/sort | head -100
...
openat(AT_FDCWD, "/tmp/sortM6Y6Y1", ...
openat(AT_FDCWD, "/tmp/sortPrHKMG", ...
$ strace -e trace=openat -c sort /proc/kallsyms > /dev/null
% time seconds usecs/call calls errors syscall
------ ----------- ----------- --------- --------- ----------------
100.00 6.419777 19 333258 8 openat
------ ----------- ----------- --------- --------- ----------------
100.00 6.419777 19 333258 8 total
It appears that the buffer size allocated for pseudo files with zero
size is insufficient, likely because it is based on their file size,
which is zero. As seen in the attached patch, I think using
`INPUT_FILE_SIZE_GUESS` to calculate the buffer size when the file size
is zero would resolve this issue.
Best regards,
Takashi Kusumi
[0001-sort-fix-performance-issue-on-zero-sized-pseudo-file.patch (text/plain, attachment)]
This bug report was last modified 1 year and 39 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.