GNU bug report logs - #70219
Bug/Issue with timeout and signals

Previous Next

Package: coreutils;

Reported by: "Branden R. Williams" <brw <at> brandenwilliams.com>

Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2024 18:01:03 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: notabug

Done: Pádraig Brady <P <at> draigBrady.com>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: "Branden R. Williams" <brw <at> brandenwilliams.com>
To: 70219 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#70219: Bug/Issue with timeout and signals
Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2024 10:19:39 -0500
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
I was integrating the timeout command into a shell script and realized the manpage & the --help docs do not accurately describe how the tool works. In addition, there appears to be a bug related to arguments passed. I am running version 9.1.

According to the help screen, this command should work:

	timeout -k 10s ping example.com <http://example.com/>

It fails, however, because the next argument after invoking -k is the kill signal you want to send. The command (to send a SIGKILL) must be:

	timeout -k 9 10s ping example.com <http://example.com/>

I believe the kill after functionality and docs should be modified to send a default signal of SIGTERM without an additional argument so the first iteration above would work. Then you could explain that if you wanted to send a DIFFERENT signal, use the -s flag that is there to pass one. But according to the docs, the first command SHOULD work. Even using the --kill-after= syntax passes in the kill signal into that argument, not the actual time.

Thank you for your consideration and for maintaining such a critical set of tools! 

Regards,

B

[Message part 2 (text/html, inline)]

This bug report was last modified 1 year and 46 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.