GNU bug report logs - #70214
'install' fails to copy regular file to autofs/cifs, due to ACL or xattr handling

Previous Next

Full log

Message #14 received at 70214 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Bruno Haible <bruno <at> clisp.org>
To: 70214 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Pádraig Brady <P <at> draigbrady.com>
Cc: "linux-cifs <at> vger.kernel.org" <linux-cifs <at> vger.kernel.org>,
 Andreas Gruenbacher <andreas.gruenbacher <at> gmail.com>
Subject: Re: bug#70214: 'install' fails to copy regular file to autofs/cifs,
 due to ACL or xattr handling
Date: Sat, 13 Apr 2024 21:29:08 +0200

Hi Pádraig,

I wrote:
> > 5) The same thing with 'cp -a' succeeds:
> > 
> > $ build-sparc64/src/cp -a /var/tmp/foo3941 $HOME/foo3941; echo $?
> > 0
> > $ build-sparc64-no-acl/src/cp -a /var/tmp/foo3941 $HOME/foo3941; echo $?
> > 0

You wrote:
> The psuedo code that install(1) uses is:
> 
> copy_reg()
>    if (x->set_mode) /* install */
>      set_acl(dest, x->mode /* 600 */)
>        ctx->acl = acl_from_mode ( /* 600 */)
>        acl_set_fd (ctx->acl) /* fails EACCES */
>        if (! acls_set)
>           must_chmod = true;
>        if (must_chmod)
>          saved_errno = EACCES;
>          chmod (ctx->mode /* 600 */)
>          if (save_errno)
>            return -1;

And, for comparison, what is the pseudo-code that 'cp -a' uses?
I would guess that there must be a relevant difference between both.

Bruno

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.