GNU bug report logs - #70087
[PATCH 1/4] gnu: gecode: Update to development version 6.3.0.

Previous Next

Package: guix-patches;

Reported by: Herman Rimm <herman <at> rimm.ee>

Date: Sat, 30 Mar 2024 11:41:01 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: patch

Done: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #23 received at 70087 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Andreas Enge <andreas <at> enge.fr>
To: Herman Rimm <herman <at> rimm.ee>
Cc: Eric Bavier <bavier <at> posteo.net>,
 Sharlatan Hellseher <sharlatanus <at> gmail.com>, 70087 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [bug#70087] [PATCH 1/4] gnu: gecode: Update to development
 version 6.3.0.
Date: Tue, 14 May 2024 13:44:31 +0200
Hello,

Am Tue, May 14, 2024 at 09:31:47AM +0200 schrieb Herman Rimm:
> A new version is required because for e.g. [1] the current gecode gives:
>   $ minizinc --solver gecode magic_square.mzn

thanks for the example! Actually you can also drop "--solver gecode", since
gecode is the default choice. And when doing
$ minizinc --solver coin-bc magic_square.mzn
it prints a solution.

So this is a good reason for updating gecode.
I do not know what would be a good commit; maybe the most recent one,
or anything before if that looks more stable. I will let you have
a look.

> > in any case it could not be called 6.3.0, since there is no such release.
> Can I use the 'git-version' procedure in the updated package and create
> a 'gecode/pinned' package which inherits from it for the 6.2.0 release?

As I understand things, you use '(git-version "6.2.0" 1 commit-number)'
for the first Guix package created from a release after 6.2.0.
There is no reason to have two packages - only minizinc depends on it,
and this is actually requiring a new package. So indeed, just update
the package.

Andreas





This bug report was last modified 1 year and 40 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.