GNU bug report logs - #70065
[PATCH 0/6] gnu: Update to Racket 8.12, Chez Scheme 10, and Zuo 1.9.

Previous Next

Package: guix-patches;

Reported by: Philip McGrath <philip <at> philipmcgrath.com>

Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2024 05:17:01 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: patch

Done: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: Philip McGrath <philip <at> philipmcgrath.com>
To: Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler <at> gmail.com>, 70065 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Cc: Katherine Cox-Buday <cox.katherine.e+guix <at> gmail.com>, Andrew Tropin <andrew <at> trop.in>, Skyler Ferris <skyvine <at> protonmail.com>
Subject: [bug#70065] [PATCH v2 7/8] gnu: chez-scheme: Update and simplify machine-type handling.
Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2024 23:59:13 -0400
Hi Liliana,

On 4/1/24 11:45, Liliana Marie Prikler wrote:
> Am Montag, dem 01.04.2024 um 02:51 -0400 schrieb Philip McGrath:
>> Since Chez Scheme 10.0.0 supports all of the backends added in
>> Racket's
>> branch, the complexity of '%chez-features-table' is no longer needed.
>> Ideally, even more of this logic could be maintained upstream, but
>> this
>> change will simplify maintenance in the mean time.
>>
>> [...]
>>
>> +(define-syntax define-machine-types
>> +  (lambda (stx)
>> +    (syntax-case stx (any)
>> +      ((_ any id0 id ...)
>> +       #`(define #,(datum->syntax #'id0 '%machine-types)
>> +           '(id0 id ...))))))
> The datum->syntax call here looks weird.

It is a little unusual. The goal is to be able to copy the *use* of 
define-machine-types directly from the Chez Scheme source code, making 
it easier to update in the future. The datum->syntax call is needed to 
synthesize an identifier that will bind in the surrounding context.

>> +;; The following is copied from s/cmacros.ss, line 36, in the Chez
>> source
>> +(define-machine-types
>> +  any
>> +  pb        tpb
> You should maybe comment ;; unthreaded    threaded

I wouldn't mind that if you think it would be useful, though I'd rather 
not do a v3 just for this. If someone does want to add it, I'd strongly 
prefer for the comment to outside of the define-machine-types 
S-expression so the use stays exactly as in the Chez source.

>> +  pb32l     tpb32l
>> +  pb32b     tpb32b
>> +  pb64l     tpb64l
>> +  pb64b     tpb64b
>> +  i3nt      ti3nt
>> +  i3osx     ti3osx
>> +  i3le      ti3le
>> +  i3fb      ti3fb
>> +  i3ob      ti3ob
>> +  i3nb      ti3nb
>> +  i3s2      ti3s2
>> +  i3qnx     ti3qnx
>> +  i3gnu     ti3gnu
>> +  a6nt      ta6nt
>> +  a6osx     ta6osx
>> +  a6le      ta6le
>> +  a6fb      ta6fb
>> +  a6ob      ta6ob
>> +  a6nb      ta6nb
>> +  a6s2      ta6s2
>> +  ppc32osx  tppc32osx
>> +  ppc32le   tppc32le
>> +  ppc32fb   tppc32fb
>> +  ppc32ob   tppc32ob
>> +  ppc32nb   tppc32nb
>> +  arm32le   tarm32le
>> +  arm32fb   tarm32fb
>> +  arm32ob   tarm32ob
>> +  arm32nb   tarm32nb
>> +  arm64nt   tarm64nt
>> +  arm64osx  tarm64osx
>> +  arm64le   tarm64le
>> +  arm64fb   tarm64fb
>> +  arm64ob   tarm64ob
>> +  arm64nb   tarm64nb
>> +  rv64le    trv64le
>> +  rv64fb    trv64fb
>> +  rv64ob    trv64ob
>> +  rv64nb    trv64nb
>> +  la64le    tla64le
>> +)
>>   

Thanks,
Philip




This bug report was last modified 1 year and 38 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.