GNU bug report logs - #69997
Should ‘guix import pypi’ get dependencies from pyproject files?

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: Tanguy LE CARROUR <tanguy <at> bioneland.org>
To: Ludovic Courtès <ludovic.courtes <at> inria.fr>
Cc: Sharlatan Hellseher <sharlatanus <at> gmail.com>, Munyoki Kilyungi <me <at> bonfacemunyoki.com>, Lars-Dominik Braun <lars <at> 6xq.net>, jgart <jgart <at> dismail.de>, Marius Bakke <marius <at> gnu.org>, 69997 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#69997: Should ‘guix import pypi’ get dependencies from pyproject files?
Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2024 08:46:01 +0100

Hi Ludo’,


Quoting Ludovic Courtès (2024-03-28 19:09:49)
> Tanguy LE CARROUR <tanguy <at> bioneland.org> skribis:
> 
> > Quoting Ludovic Courtès (2024-03-26 17:04:52)
> 
> [...]
> 
> >> But then I mean, we could offer, say, ‘guix import upstream https://…’,
> >> and that thing could parse ‘setup.py’ or similar to produce a package
> >> definition from that.
> >
> > I’m not against a good-old-generic-solution®, but this one might be
> > a bit… too generic. It contains no mention to Python, so the next logical step
> > would be `guix import URL`. Not that I would not like it, though! 😁
> 
> Well, this has been on my mind for a long time.  Such a tool could
> provide at least a useful package skeleton even for software using CMake
> or Autotools.
> 
> > So I would say… let’s wait and see what the others think. In the
> > meantime, I’ll have to dive deeper in the PEP and the actual importer
> > code.
> 
> Looks like consensus among you Pythonistas has yet to be reached
> regarding whether ‘pyproject.toml’ data would be a useful addition.  :-)

I have to admit that the Zen of Python [1] "There should be one-- and preferably only one --
obvious way to do it." has been recently difficult to follow packaging-wise!

[1]: https://peps.python.org/pep-0020

Even Poetry, the one I’ve been using for years, as made questionable
decisions [2] and I have to admit that I had a look at the competitors.

[2]: https://python-poetry.org/docs/faq/#why-does-poetry-not-adhere-to-semantic-versioning


> PS: I hear more and more long-time Python developers dismayed by the sad
>     state of packaging and code evolution in Python.  In Guile land, we
>     say: refugees welcome!  Come discover a great language and a great
>     community (together with their own set of problems).

Thanks for the kind invitation, but… I have an acute form of parens-itis.
Seeing more that a pair of parenthesis on a single line make my eyes bleed! 😅
And… `#` is for comments, every other use is complete heresy and those
who go against the creed should suffer! … isn’t that what the parentheses
are for?! 😉

Any way, thanks again for caring about Python!

Regards,

-- 
Tanguy

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.