Subject: bug#6991: Please keep bytecode out of *Backtrace* buffers

From: Clément Pit--Claudel <[email-masked]>
Date: Sat, 26 Nov 2016 22:34:47 -0500

On 2016-11-26 19:33, Noam Postavsky wrote:
> I think it might make sense to hide the bytecode with display
> properties, but keep the text itself so that it's not lost when copied
> to an email.

This sounds like a great idea!  Maybe with an indication that bytecode was omitted?  Something like "[bytecode]"?

I wonder if it would make sense to move `backtrace' to Lisp, too; it would make it easier to customize it.

Clément.