GNU bug report logs -
#69894
29.1; Icalendar export conflict with calendar iso date
Previous Next
Reported by: RwN <rwn <at> mailo.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2024 04:06:04 UTC
Severity: normal
Found in version 29.1
Done: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
Full log
Message #11 received at 69894 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
On 3/28/24 03:53, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>> diff -u --label /usr/local/share/emacs/29.1/lisp/calendar/icalendar.el.gz --label /tmp/icalendar.el /tmp/jka-commHr8dl /tmp/icalendar.el
>> --- /usr/local/share/emacs/29.1/lisp/calendar/icalendar.el.gz
>> +++ /tmp/icalendar.el
>> @@ -894,8 +894,8 @@
>> (save-match-data
>> (cond ( ;; iso-style numeric date
>> (string-match (concat "\\s-*"
>> - "\\([0-9]\\{4\\}\\)[ \t/]\\s-*"
>> - "0?\\([1-9][0-9]?\\)[ \t/]\\s-*"
>> + "\\([0-9]\\{4\\}\\)[ \t/-]\\s-*"
>> + "0?\\([1-9][0-9]?\\)[ \t/-]\\s-*"
>> "0?\\([1-9][0-9]?\\)")
>> datestring)
>> (setq year (read (substring datestring (match-beginning 1)
>>
>> Diff finished. Tue Mar 19 02:40:06 2024
>>
>> Is it a correct solution to proposed?
> Paul, WDYT about the proposed change?
I'm no expert on diary files. Certainly the "-" is ISO format (space and
tab are not).
By the way, those two instances of 0?\\([1-9][0-9]?\\) both look bogus
to me, as they match strings like 099 that are implausible month or
day-of-month numbers.
This bug report was last modified 1 year and 42 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.