From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Sep 03 18:26:33 2010 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Sep 2010 22:26:33 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OreiP-00028g-HQ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 03 Sep 2010 18:26:33 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OreiN-00028b-Mz for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 03 Sep 2010 18:26:32 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Orek2-0006tU-KK for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 03 Sep 2010 18:28:18 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.1 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]:46451) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Orek2-0006tQ-Ho for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 03 Sep 2010 18:28:14 -0400 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=38405 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Orejp-0007Mb-LW for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Sep 2010 18:28:14 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Orege-0006GV-Jm for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Sep 2010 18:25:37 -0400 Received: from mail-qw0-f41.google.com ([209.85.216.41]:36693) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Orege-0006GO-G4 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Sep 2010 18:24:44 -0400 Received: by qwf7 with SMTP id 7so3030935qwf.0 for ; Fri, 03 Sep 2010 15:24:44 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=VnWqbUwf45MGiY3s6bfNLHpXyZFHeboJzTL3CLiDTJY=; b=QOf1tlSf+ho21BJEuKuA4p7xTeIU0VJGzTFHku1CGqmZf7UJoA53r/oMDzqkhG904f EMSTdhMIFV7p4NiZjCIgW4v2gSXZbB/C13fpxdoT4pOScMxz6CvzsaftbxowjxX5PjG/ rs+5+gl30g21hC3OLibtgu+2/ObF9WZ5aoT6g= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; b=HqOPJfzQDpC+iyPlXqRFqmgR3V1NKovCLtCxvr5blzHJ6MDPFRVlQIQU/fep/jTGQ8 +OOohUoAnYP2Hg7v7iaYJ0Wc4IYkbrK/0wkylqP0j9ER9X+tI58OnvCi+9ac6q8lHK2f 9PRDnYS9Qicni+CtV6k4+zWv+HAEitb3Ofb28= Received: by 10.224.45.135 with SMTP id e7mr482846qaf.166.1283552683991; Fri, 03 Sep 2010 15:24:43 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.27.133 with HTTP; Fri, 3 Sep 2010 15:24:21 -0700 (PDT) From: Lennart Borgman Date: Sat, 4 Sep 2010 00:24:21 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Could goto-char please have its own history list? To: Emacs Bugs Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-Spam-Score: -4.6 (----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -4.6 (----) I can't see no reason its history should be mixed by something else. (More than devel historic reasons ;-) From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Aug 10 15:53:10 2011 Received: (at 6980) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Aug 2011 19:53:10 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QrEpx-0004ac-U9 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 10 Aug 2011 15:53:10 -0400 Received: from smarty.dreamhost.com ([208.113.175.8]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QrEpv-0004aU-4M for 6980@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 10 Aug 2011 15:53:08 -0400 Received: from ps18281.dreamhostps.com (ps18281.dreamhost.com [69.163.218.105]) by smarty.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F16306E8088; Wed, 10 Aug 2011 12:51:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (ps18281.dreamhostps.com [69.163.218.105]) by ps18281.dreamhostps.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0122451C366; Wed, 10 Aug 2011 12:51:49 -0700 (PDT) From: Juri Linkov To: Lennart Borgman Subject: Re: Could goto-char please have its own history list? Organization: JURTA References: Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2011 22:50:39 +0300 In-Reply-To: (Lennart Borgman's message of "Sat, 4 Sep 2010 00:24:21 +0200") Message-ID: <878vr1rqpc.fsf@mail.jurta.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 6980 Cc: 6980@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) > I can't see no reason its history should be mixed by something else. > (More than devel historic reasons ;-) It makes sense to share the same history that contains only numeric values between all commands that use `read-number', like e.g. `goto-line' and `goto-char' (with some changes), because non-numeric values (added to the history from other commands) are useless for such number-reading commands. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Aug 10 17:43:20 2011 Received: (at 6980) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Aug 2011 21:43:20 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QrGYa-000826-HS for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 10 Aug 2011 17:43:20 -0400 Received: from rcsinet15.oracle.com ([148.87.113.117]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QrGYY-00081z-Rb for 6980@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 10 Aug 2011 17:43:19 -0400 Received: from rtcsinet21.oracle.com (rtcsinet21.oracle.com [66.248.204.29]) by rcsinet15.oracle.com (Switch-3.4.4/Switch-3.4.4) with ESMTP id p7ALg0rx001580 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 10 Aug 2011 21:42:02 GMT Received: from acsmt357.oracle.com (acsmt357.oracle.com [141.146.40.157]) by rtcsinet21.oracle.com (8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p7ALfu0w018754 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 10 Aug 2011 21:41:57 GMT Received: from abhmt113.oracle.com (abhmt113.oracle.com [141.146.116.65]) by acsmt357.oracle.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id p7ALfpWU003004; Wed, 10 Aug 2011 16:41:51 -0500 Received: from dradamslap1 (/130.35.178.194) by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Wed, 10 Aug 2011 14:41:51 -0700 From: "Drew Adams" To: "'Juri Linkov'" , "'Lennart Borgman'" References: <878vr1rqpc.fsf@mail.jurta.org> Subject: RE: bug#6980: Could goto-char please have its own history list? Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2011 14:41:51 -0700 Message-ID: <89731AF8DD9241E7807DCEED9672DC4B@us.oracle.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 In-Reply-To: <878vr1rqpc.fsf@mail.jurta.org> Thread-Index: AcxXlx57b5+iahV3QA6QLV2E5H32ugADsbOA X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6109 X-Source-IP: rtcsinet21.oracle.com [66.248.204.29] X-CT-RefId: str=0001.0A090207.4E42FB2A.0093,ss=1,re=0.000,fgs=0 X-Spam-Score: -4.2 (----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 6980 Cc: 6980@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -4.2 (----) > > I can't see no reason its history should be mixed by something else. > > (More than devel historic reasons ;-) > > It makes sense to share the same history that contains only numeric > values between all commands that use `read-number', like > e.g. `goto-line' and `goto-char' (with some changes), because > non-numeric values (added to the history from other commands) > are useless for such number-reading commands. I don't have much of an opinion about the suggestion. There are always pros & cons to making a history more or less specific. But I'll point out that just because non-numeric histories are inappropriate for numeric input does not mean that the same numeric history should be used for all numeric inputs. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Aug 18 07:56:09 2011 Received: (at 6980) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Aug 2011 11:56:09 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qu1Cj-0006JC-6a for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 18 Aug 2011 07:56:09 -0400 Received: from smarty.dreamhost.com ([208.113.175.8]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qu1Cg-0006J3-Qd for 6980@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 18 Aug 2011 07:56:07 -0400 Received: from ps18281.dreamhostps.com (ps18281.dreamhost.com [69.163.218.105]) by smarty.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C10CC6E8074; Thu, 18 Aug 2011 04:54:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (ps18281.dreamhostps.com [69.163.218.105]) by ps18281.dreamhostps.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4A1D451C3C3; Thu, 18 Aug 2011 04:54:06 -0700 (PDT) From: Juri Linkov To: "Drew Adams" Subject: Re: bug#6980: Could goto-char please have its own history list? Organization: JURTA References: <878vr1rqpc.fsf@mail.jurta.org> <89731AF8DD9241E7807DCEED9672DC4B@us.oracle.com> Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2011 14:52:20 +0300 In-Reply-To: <89731AF8DD9241E7807DCEED9672DC4B@us.oracle.com> (Drew Adams's message of "Wed, 10 Aug 2011 14:41:51 -0700") Message-ID: <87sjoz543b.fsf@mail.jurta.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 6980 Cc: 'Lennart Borgman' , 6980@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) >> > I can't see no reason its history should be mixed by something else. >> > (More than devel historic reasons ;-) >> >> It makes sense to share the same history that contains only numeric >> values between all commands that use `read-number', like >> e.g. `goto-line' and `goto-char' (with some changes), because >> non-numeric values (added to the history from other commands) >> are useless for such number-reading commands. > > I don't have much of an opinion about the suggestion. > There are always pros & cons to making a history more or less specific. > > But I'll point out that just because non-numeric histories are inappropriate for > numeric input does not mean that the same numeric history should be used for all > numeric inputs. Yes, not all number-reading commands should share the numeric history. For instance, version-control commands that read a revision number can also accept non-numeric values like "submit:". So every case should be carefully considered on its own. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Aug 18 08:29:51 2011 Received: (at 6980) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Aug 2011 12:29:51 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qu1jJ-00072h-EM for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 18 Aug 2011 08:29:50 -0400 Received: from mail-ew0-f44.google.com ([209.85.215.44]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qu1jH-00072a-CV for 6980@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 18 Aug 2011 08:29:48 -0400 Received: by ewy19 with SMTP id 19so930111ewy.3 for <6980@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 18 Aug 2011 05:27:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=MfOOyIAjYpbbFsn63y+1KomyuhzBpsdnwIJZtfLOaM4=; b=ucA0tZc72T5bZ8pCG1Vq+JBPKrVYCJ/ntfmogxy6PGblUbQSiJngdpLWfgLDy9dZ0C /eee/jXO/Q2pP4px0qGn/TfzGhbXuT+puHdF2hppvIc0MNcPbZoujLI6U+NPkG0ykSeU k0vZLTmF1pfFkkTM05ncyqNeBtv8hrk1cc3Fw= Received: by 10.213.29.76 with SMTP id p12mr175452ebc.74.1313670467636; Thu, 18 Aug 2011 05:27:47 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.213.19.132 with HTTP; Thu, 18 Aug 2011 05:27:27 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87sjoz543b.fsf@mail.jurta.org> References: <878vr1rqpc.fsf@mail.jurta.org> <89731AF8DD9241E7807DCEED9672DC4B@us.oracle.com> <87sjoz543b.fsf@mail.jurta.org> From: Lennart Borgman Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2011 14:27:27 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#6980: Could goto-char please have its own history list? To: Juri Linkov Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -3.6 (---) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 6980 Cc: 6980@debbugs.gnu.org, Drew Adams X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -3.6 (---) On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 13:52, Juri Linkov wrote: >>> > I can't see no reason its history should be mixed by something else. >>> > (More than devel historic reasons ;-) >>> >>> It makes sense to share the same history that contains only numeric >>> values between all commands that use `read-number', like >>> e.g. `goto-line' and `goto-char' (with some changes), because >>> non-numeric values (added to the history from other commands) >>> are useless for such number-reading commands. >> >> I don't have much of an opinion about the suggestion. >> There are always pros & cons to making a history more or less specific. >> >> But I'll point out that just because non-numeric histories are inappropr= iate for >> numeric input does not mean that the same numeric history should be used= for all >> numeric inputs. > > Yes, not all number-reading commands should share the numeric history. > > For instance, version-control commands that read a revision number > can also accept non-numeric values like "submit:". =C2=A0So every case > should be carefully considered on its own. And of course I mean "I can see no reason its history should be mixed by something else". ;-) From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Nov 18 23:36:20 2020 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Nov 2020 04:36:20 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37496 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kfbgC-0006DO-1t for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 23:36:20 -0500 Received: from mail-ed1-f49.google.com ([209.85.208.49]:36857) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kfbg9-0006Cu-45 for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 23:36:18 -0500 Received: by mail-ed1-f49.google.com with SMTP id m16so4424389edr.3 for ; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 20:36:17 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=vN3iK/7y3BOHgx5Vlfd4SCD2dL50wU9SLmqcow3+LNw=; b=EAo3Ha/cduJma76Y8A8UEbVMKBTEixz/HEYDkXQ0A8Bv88GMyNC0+kCfHrbXp51Igy qUj8VngN49upqE8wE3hBg0J1XLgzGTco1zxXsS4GKvjy/GpP2uX1P9tkWxIa9HMMouwt ITIO6KDvNTGtJYK5G8DIGGT+un3ifsl1r+T4XUaGOpWiW4Xk2gff1TRSKJ8kJeI2FUt7 powxlC4UiuIpwTQEVPiI1W4rXFNmPFunLkudxJmK08aJpYsNVPmf//KFg1k4drvraswE AQ1HpBpNePB5A1oCpQrydz5+YABfsUe4iM7n7R/qgGXqH4EGiYf0PmaIUEgfcAuPortd H0qw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533Jb5qeNQi0gojk+bIp+Df2C3NTia4+gzA8iIfulw7EqXOu06n2 19cBs3HAGpkaxyhxw8O5cS599A8yZBH/S/uaq+hH1Ww6cIM= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzmAe3HIGToKjwxBJ9OW4wL0uRtp8EaF/ZuwOjV8XbK9BVF+kewBso6+n1ykDHbGjXlKH7VUQe592MpI0l0kU4= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:1114:: with SMTP id u20mr27601944edv.377.1605760571286; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 20:36:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from 753933720722 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 20:36:10 -0800 From: Stefan Kangas MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2020 20:36:10 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: To: control@debbugs.gnu.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Score: 2.5 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: tags 6980 + easy thanks Content analysis details: (2.5 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.2 HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS From and EnvelopeFrom 2nd level mail domains are different 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (stefankangas[at]gmail.com) 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 RBL: Average reputation (+2) [209.85.208.49 listed in wl.mailspike.net] -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [209.85.208.49 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 UNPARSEABLE_RELAY Informational: message has unparseable relay lines 2.0 BLANK_SUBJECT Subject is present but empty 0.2 FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN 2nd level domains in From and EnvelopeFrom freemail headers are different X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 1.5 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: tags 6980 + easy thanks Content analysis details: (1.5 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 RBL: Average reputation (+2) [209.85.208.49 listed in wl.mailspike.net] -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [209.85.208.49 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.2 HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS From and EnvelopeFrom 2nd level mail domains are different 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (stefankangas[at]gmail.com) 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 UNPARSEABLE_RELAY Informational: message has unparseable relay lines 2.0 BLANK_SUBJECT Subject is present but empty -1.0 MAILING_LIST_MULTI Multiple indicators imply a widely-seen list manager 0.2 FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN 2nd level domains in From and EnvelopeFrom freemail headers are different tags 6980 + easy thanks From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Feb 17 04:38:34 2021 Received: (at 6980) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Feb 2021 09:38:34 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42502 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lCJI2-0008Q7-EH for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 17 Feb 2021 04:38:34 -0500 Received: from relay10.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.178.230]:55243) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lCJHy-0008Pd-RM for 6980@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 17 Feb 2021 04:38:31 -0500 Received: from mail.gandi.net (m91-129-96-116.cust.tele2.ee [91.129.96.116]) (Authenticated sender: juri@linkov.net) by relay10.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 79CA3240008; Wed, 17 Feb 2021 09:38:22 +0000 (UTC) From: Juri Linkov To: Lennart Borgman Subject: Re: bug#6980: Could goto-char please have its own history list? References: <878vr1rqpc.fsf@mail.jurta.org> Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2021 10:51:08 +0200 In-Reply-To: <878vr1rqpc.fsf@mail.jurta.org> (Juri Linkov's message of "Wed, 10 Aug 2011 22:50:39 +0300") Message-ID: <875z2rf56r.fsf@linkov.net> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -0.5 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 6980 Cc: 6980@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.5 (-) >> I can't see no reason its history should be mixed by something else. >> (More than devel historic reasons ;-) > > It makes sense to share the same history that contains only numeric > values between all commands that use `read-number', like > e.g. `goto-line' and `goto-char' (with some changes), because > non-numeric values (added to the history from other commands) > are useless for such number-reading commands. Matt reminded about this request in https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2021-02/msg01270.html Now `read-number' has own history in `read-number-history' added a year ago in bug#38282. The same commit 7c5d6a2afc6 also added `goto-line-history' for `goto-line'. So this request could be closed unless there is still a need to add `goto-char-history' for `goto-char' too. I'm not sure if `read-number-history' is sufficient already, or own history should be added to every number-reading command like `move-to-column', etc. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Jul 18 16:23:10 2021 Received: (at 6980) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Jul 2021 20:23:10 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57473 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1m5DJe-0005st-0C for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 18 Jul 2021 16:23:10 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:37736) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1m5DJc-0005sY-40 for 6980@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 18 Jul 2021 16:23:09 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=3DQRIjskT/CLnmitvCDVxBkDpzlKimJcfhg0cZmOwu0=; b=gDYDXAvm0cTpxv9cYRVycO/SAC k7qjmDhwIXXlQlZSPQTc6w79i1Rk0ke72+WsKe5bCFdfadgqDkS8ZBCnsAECLxZUOCZcdbrbf6M10 WdWHLn1RbhW4vRNKwzNHn2H93CGFZPBVvblfohvNC995PgijgK/DWqVMytM3bAl2dQUg=; Received: from cm-84.212.220.105.getinternet.no ([84.212.220.105] helo=elva) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1m5DJS-0003ta-Mk; Sun, 18 Jul 2021 22:23:01 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: Juri Linkov Subject: Re: bug#6980: Could goto-char please have its own history list? References: <878vr1rqpc.fsf@mail.jurta.org> <875z2rf56r.fsf@linkov.net> X-Now-Playing: David Bowie's _Diamond Dogs_: "Rebel Rebel" Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2021 22:22:58 +0200 In-Reply-To: <875z2rf56r.fsf@linkov.net> (Juri Linkov's message of "Wed, 17 Feb 2021 10:51:08 +0200") Message-ID: <87k0lnmkwt.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Juri Linkov writes: > Now `read-number' has own history in `read-number-history' added a year ago > in bug#38282. The same commit 7c5d6a2afc6 also added `goto-line-history' > for `goto-line'. > > So this request could be [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 6980 Cc: Lennart Borgman , 6980@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Juri Linkov writes: > Now `read-number' has own history in `read-number-history' added a year ago > in bug#38282. The same commit 7c5d6a2afc6 also added `goto-line-history' > for `goto-line'. > > So this request could be closed unless there is still a need to add > `goto-char-history' for `goto-char' too. I'm not sure if > `read-number-history' is sufficient already, or own history should be added > to every number-reading command like `move-to-column', etc. I think the new number history is probably sufficient, so I'm closing this bug report. But I wouldn't object if somebody feels strongly that `goto-char' should have its own history. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Jul 18 16:23:13 2021 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Jul 2021 20:23:13 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57476 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1m5DJh-0005t8-7F for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 18 Jul 2021 16:23:13 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:37752) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1m5DJg-0005sk-1T for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 18 Jul 2021 16:23:12 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Subject:From:To:Message-Id:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Cc: MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=LA0w5vGugC9c4LiQroVoF7pFnWbp/jY4WpEaxxOj82o=; b=opM87axiwqb0Hj+0ZYNesljzJt RyUFiPg9lETu6sop4b1jm27JNmFRETEIivEGN9vAUluPP+M/oetxTvpsmswjw/aGDliSAbGXSViWa 8bwuawQ3GWlfq3LoRECnfv1U+KoXxkGemMO/lq/802SUf8W7CehW3dwnmADu28TmVo2A=; Received: from cm-84.212.220.105.getinternet.no ([84.212.220.105] helo=elva) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1m5DJY-0003tn-Gr for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 18 Jul 2021 22:23:06 +0200 Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2021 22:23:04 +0200 Message-Id: <87im17mkwn.fsf@gnus.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: control message for bug #6980 X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: close 6980 quit Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) close 6980 quit From unknown Fri Jun 20 07:24:22 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2021 11:24:06 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator