GNU bug report logs -
#69749
(bindat-type sint 32 t) -> unbound variable bitlen
Previous Next
Full log
View this message in rfc822 format
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Your message dated Sun, 17 Mar 2024 21:13:10 +0200
with message-id <86wmq04qpl.fsf <at> gnu.org>
and subject line Re: bug#69749: (bindat-type sint 32 t) -> unbound variable bitlen
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #69749,
regarding (bindat-type sint 32 t) -> unbound variable bitlen
to be marked as done.
(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs <at> gnu.org.)
--
69749: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=69749
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems
[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]
-- file bd.el
(require 'bindat)
(bindat-pack (bindat-type sint 32 t) 42)
--
emacs -Q --batch -l bd.el -->
Error: void-variable (bitlen)
mapbacktrace(#f(compiled-function (evald func args flags) #<bytecode
-0x160fbb9816517825>))
debug-early-backtrace()
debug-early(error (void-variable bitlen))
(/ bitlen 8)
(+ bindat-idx (/ bitlen 8))
(setq bindat-idx (+ bindat-idx (/ bitlen 8)))
(let ((v field2)) (setq bindat-idx (+ bindat-idx (/ bitlen 8))))
(let ((field2 (if (< v 0) (+ v wrap) v))) (let ((v field2)) (setq
bindat-idx (+ bindat-idx (/ bitlen 8)))))
(let ((v v)) (let ((field2 (if (< v 0) (+ v wrap) v))) (let ((v
field2)) (setq bindat-idx (+ bindat-idx (/ bitlen 8))))))
(lambda (v) (let ((v v)) (let ((field2 (if (< v 0) (+ v wrap) v)))
(let ((v field2)) (setq bindat-idx (+ bindat-idx (/ bitlen 8)))))))(42)
bindat--length-group(42 #s(bindat--type :le (lambda (v) (let ((v v))
(let ((field2 (if (< v 0) (+ v wrap) v))) (let ((v field2)) (setq
bindat-idx (+ bindat-idx (/ bitlen 8))))))) :ue (lambda nil (let ((n (if
t (bindat--unpack-uintr bitlen) (bindat--unpack-uint bitlen)))) (if (>=
n max) (- n wrap) n))) :pe (lambda (v) (let ((v v)) (let ((field2 (if (<
v 0) (+ v wrap) v))) (let ((v field2)) (if t (bindat--pack-uintr bitlen
v) (bindat--pack-uint bitlen v))))))))
bindat-length(#s(bindat--type :le (lambda (v) (let ((v v)) (let
((field2 (if (< v 0) (+ v wrap) v))) (let ((v field2)) (setq bindat-idx
(+ bindat-idx (/ bitlen 8))))))) :ue (lambda nil (let ((n (if t
(bindat--unpack-uintr bitlen) (bindat--unpack-uint bitlen)))) (if (>= n
max) (- n wrap) n))) :pe (lambda (v) (let ((v v)) (let ((field2 (if (< v
0) (+ v wrap) v))) (let ((v field2)) (if t (bindat--pack-uintr bitlen v)
(bindat--pack-uint bitlen v))))))) 42)
bindat-pack(#s(bindat--type :le (lambda (v) (let ((v v)) (let
((field2 (if (< v 0) (+ v wrap) v))) (let ((v field2)) (setq bindat-idx
(+ bindat-idx (/ bitlen 8))))))) :ue (lambda nil (let ((n (if t
(bindat--unpack-uintr bitlen) (bindat--unpack-uint bitlen)))) (if (>= n
max) (- n wrap) n))) :pe (lambda (v) (let ((v v)) (let ((field2 (if (< v
0) (+ v wrap) v))) (let ((v field2)) (if t (bindat--pack-uintr bitlen v)
(bindat--pack-uint bitlen v))))))) 42)
load-with-code-conversion("/tmp/bd.el" "/tmp/bd.el" nil t)
command-line-1(("-l" "/tmp/bd.el"))
command-line()
normal-top-level()
Symbol’s value as variable is void: bitlen
This bug is difficult to understand. Run from an IELM buffer, this code
works as expected. The macroexpansion of the bindat-type declaration
includes a binding for bitlen.
GNU Emacs 29.2 (build 2, x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 3.24.41,
cairo version 1.18.0) of 2024-03-09, modified by Debian
[Message part 3 (message/rfc822, inline)]
> Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2024 19:28:17 +0100
> Cc: 69749-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> From: Eric Marsden <eric.marsden <at> risk-engineering.org>
>
> Le 3/16/2024 à 12:16 PM, Eli Zaretskii a écrit :
> >> The patch I installed indeed doesn't impact the performance of the code.
> >> The underlying detail which requires `lexical-binding` to be active does
> >> cause the code for `sint` to be significantly less efficient than that
> >> for `uint`, tho, so if performance is important, you may prefer to use
> >> `uint` and do the conversion to a signed integer manually elsewhere. 🙁
> > Thanks, should we now close this bug?
>
> In my opinion yes, and thanks.
>
> (Not sure whether my cc to -done will work.)
It will.
This bug report was last modified 1 year and 144 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.