GNU bug report logs -
#69738
[BUG] rmail-mail-new-frame doesn't delete the new frame after composing the message on Emacs 29.2
Previous Next
Reported by: rameiko87 <at> posteo.net
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2024 22:51:02 UTC
Severity: normal
Done: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
Full log
Message #31 received at 69738 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Actually the neat solution is probably to treat frames as a ring, so
that C-x 5 o would go back to the previous frame. Is there any reason
why frames were not conceived as a ring, but ``rigidly''?
> Dear Eli,
>
> To answer your question: your patch doesn't work, and the reason is
> that I have Rmail on frame #6 and Elfeed on frame #3. Rmail-reply
> creates frame #42, from which both C-x 5 0 and C-x 5 o land on frame
> #27. C-u - C-x 5 o goes from #42 to #3, and also from #27 to #3 after
> #42 was deleted.
>
> As for the current code for GUI, I can't understand why it _works_
> since the same exact problem should arise. I never used the GUI but I
> would expect that it actually doesn't work for GUI either, for the
> same reasons above. I think the design of Emacs makes the order of
> frames rigid, so every new frame can be arbitrarily far from the
> original Rmail frame.
>
> One way is to remember the frame where Rmail was and revert back to
> that one after deleting the reply frame.
>
> On 14.04.2024 18:30, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>>> Why not just remove the condition of (display-multi-frame-p)? It's
>>> neater, and I can't see any drawbacks compared to your patch (but the
>>> fact that your code insists on switching to other before deleting the
>>> frame makes me think there must be some reason...?)
>>
>> Yes, I have my reasons: I'd like to make sure we switch to the exact
>> frame the user wants -- the one showing the Rmail buffer. Unlike on
>> GUI displays, only a single frame is shown on a TTY, so if we
>> accidentally switch to the wrong frame, the user will not see the
>> frame they need, something that does happen on GUI terminals.
>>
>> Does the patch as I sent it work for you? If not, please tell what
>> doesn't work.
This bug report was last modified 1 year and 26 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.