GNU bug report logs -
#69738
[BUG] rmail-mail-new-frame doesn't delete the new frame after composing the message on Emacs 29.2
Previous Next
Reported by: rameiko87 <at> posteo.net
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2024 22:51:02 UTC
Severity: normal
Done: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
Full log
View this message in rfc822 format
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Your message dated Thu, 21 Mar 2024 10:57:25 +0200
with message-id <86edc42c96.fsf <at> gnu.org>
and subject line Re: bug#69738: [BUG] rmail-mail-new-frame doesn't delete the new frame after composing the message on Emacs 29.2
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #69738,
regarding [BUG] rmail-mail-new-frame doesn't delete the new frame after composing the message on Emacs 29.2
to be marked as done.
(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs <at> gnu.org.)
--
69738: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=69738
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems
[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]
For brevity I don't include the steps for C-c nor for C-s but only for
C-d and C-k; but I can assure you that the case of C-c would yield the
same result; I wonder what the desired result would be for C-s instead.
Steps to reproduce:
emacs -Q -nw
M-: (setq rmail-mail-new-frame t)
M-x rmail
m
C-c C-d
alternatively, use C-c C-k on the last line.
Expected result:
The frame is deleted (as the manual specifies at the end of 34.10).
Actual result:
The frame is not deleted.
[Message part 3 (message/rfc822, inline)]
> Cc: 69738 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2024 15:54:47 +0200
> From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
>
> > Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2024 22:49:54 +0000
> > From: rameiko87 <at> posteo.net
> >
> > For brevity I don't include the steps for C-c nor for C-s but only for
> > C-d and C-k; but I can assure you that the case of C-c would yield the
> > same result; I wonder what the desired result would be for C-s instead.
> >
> > Steps to reproduce:
> >
> > emacs -Q -nw
> > M-: (setq rmail-mail-new-frame t)
> > M-x rmail
> > m
> > C-c C-d
> >
> > alternatively, use C-c C-k on the last line.
> >
> > Expected result:
> > The frame is deleted (as the manual specifies at the end of 34.10).
> >
> > Actual result:
> > The frame is not deleted.
>
> It's a documentation bug: that frame is deleted only if certain
> conditions are met. One of those conditions is that there are
> visible frames on display besides the frame where the message was
> composed. In the -nw session, that condition is not met. See
> rmail-mail-return for more details about what is actually being done
> in each case.
>
> IOW: this is a feature, and (IMO) a reasonable one at that, it just
> needs a better documentation.
I've now made the documentation more accurate (on the emacs-29
branch), and I'm therefore closing this bug.
This bug report was last modified 1 year and 26 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.