GNU bug report logs -
#69732
[PATCH] gnu: atop: Update source hash.
Previous Next
Reported by: Greg Hogan <code <at> greghogan.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2024 13:01:02 UTC
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Done: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
Full log
View this message in rfc822 format
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Your bug report
#69732: [PATCH] gnu: atop: Update source hash.
which was filed against the guix-patches package, has been closed.
The explanation is attached below, along with your original report.
If you require more details, please reply to 69732 <at> debbugs.gnu.org.
--
69732: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=69732
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems
[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]
Hi,
Greg Hogan <code <at> greghogan.com> skribis:
> $ ./pre-inst-env guix build atop
> The following derivations will be built:
> /gnu/store/v6sqkj93jnnixg6294abs9f67nq7719c-atop-2.9.0.drv
> /gnu/store/rxf1gbfs97k5br7mhf8wsgy3qp5y6rbr-atop-2.9.0.tar.gz.drv
>
> building
> /gnu/store/rxf1gbfs97k5br7mhf8wsgy3qp5y6rbr-atop-2.9.0.tar.gz.drv...
> /sha256 hash mismatch for
> /gnu/store/raki8h0anzpxci2ghgcdz1crf9k2jrlx-atop-2.9.0.tar.gz:
> expected hash: 1y4qmc8i7zg2cqrmz38dxbsj8bb2h7jm1zz23gqcdygkgaymwddw
> actual hash: 09prpw20ps6cd8qr63glbcip3jrvnnic0m7j1q02g8hjnw8z50ld
I downloaded both the old tarball (still available as substitutes) and
the new one, and here’s the difference:
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
$ diff -ru /tmp/atop-2.9.0{.orig,}
Only in /tmp/atop-2.9.0: mkdate
$ cat /tmp/atop-2.9.0/mkdate
#!/bin/sh
# Make a new versdate.h with the current date filled
#
CURDATE=$(date +%Y/%m/%d\ %H:%M:%S)
echo "#ifndef __ATOP_VERSDATA__" > versdate.h
echo "#define __ATOP_VERSDATA__" >> versdate.h
echo "#define ATOPDATE \"$CURDATE\"" >> versdate.h
echo "#endif" >> versdate.h
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
Since that file does exactly what we don’t want, I added a snippet to
remove it (which effectively gets us back to the original tarball,
ironically.)
I also modified the commit log to explain that.
Thanks,
Ludo’.
[Message part 3 (message/rfc822, inline)]
$ ./pre-inst-env guix build atop
The following derivations will be built:
/gnu/store/v6sqkj93jnnixg6294abs9f67nq7719c-atop-2.9.0.drv
/gnu/store/rxf1gbfs97k5br7mhf8wsgy3qp5y6rbr-atop-2.9.0.tar.gz.drv
building
/gnu/store/rxf1gbfs97k5br7mhf8wsgy3qp5y6rbr-atop-2.9.0.tar.gz.drv...
/sha256 hash mismatch for
/gnu/store/raki8h0anzpxci2ghgcdz1crf9k2jrlx-atop-2.9.0.tar.gz:
expected hash: 1y4qmc8i7zg2cqrmz38dxbsj8bb2h7jm1zz23gqcdygkgaymwddw
actual hash: 09prpw20ps6cd8qr63glbcip3jrvnnic0m7j1q02g8hjnw8z50ld
hash mismatch for store item '/gnu/store/raki8h0anzpxci2ghgcdz1crf9k2jrlx-atop-2.9.0.tar.gz'
build of /gnu/store/rxf1gbfs97k5br7mhf8wsgy3qp5y6rbr-atop-2.9.0.tar.gz.drv failed
View build log at '/var/log/guix/drvs/rx/f1gbfs97k5br7mhf8wsgy3qp5y6rbr-atop-2.9.0.tar.gz.drv.gz'.
cannot build derivation `/gnu/store/v6sqkj93jnnixg6294abs9f67nq7719c-atop-2.9.0.drv': 1 dependencies couldn't be built
guix build: error: build of `/gnu/store/v6sqkj93jnnixg6294abs9f67nq7719c-atop-2.9.0.drv' failed
* gnu/packages/admin.scm (atop): Update source hash.
---
gnu/packages/admin.scm | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/admin.scm b/gnu/packages/admin.scm
index c12d47da4b..5148020c96 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/admin.scm
+++ b/gnu/packages/admin.scm
@@ -5119,7 +5119,7 @@ (define-public atop
version ".tar.gz"))
(sha256
(base32
- "1y4qmc8i7zg2cqrmz38dxbsj8bb2h7jm1zz23gqcdygkgaymwddw"))))
+ "09prpw20ps6cd8qr63glbcip3jrvnnic0m7j1q02g8hjnw8z50ld"))))
(build-system gnu-build-system)
(arguments
(list
base-commit: 1e5e3d8e24e8ed0b071fcd4b95d2a0a05c80c546
--
2.44.0
This bug report was last modified 1 year and 47 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.