GNU bug report logs -
#69731
[PATCH 0/2] Fix prosody system test
Previous Next
Reported by: Carlo Zancanaro <carlo <at> zancanaro.id.au>
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2024 11:59:02 UTC
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Done: Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler <at> gmail.com>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
Full log
View this message in rfc822 format
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Your message dated Sun, 17 Mar 2024 13:29:27 +0100
with message-id <bd0b8a27f87abb2cd12f178c471a5b4662bc4e51.camel <at> gmail.com>
and subject line Re: [bug#69731] [PATCH 0/2] Fix prosody system test
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #69731,
regarding [PATCH 0/2] Fix prosody system test
to be marked as done.
(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs <at> gnu.org.)
--
69731: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=69731
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems
[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]
In a previous patch[1], Liliana found that the prosody system test was
failing. I did some investigation, and found that this was because the
saslauth module doesn't allow PLAIN or LOGIN authentication on insecure
connections.
There is a configuration item for this, but we didn't have it as a part of the
Guix prosody-configuration objects, so I added it and then used it to make the
test pass.
[1]: https://issues.guix.gnu.org/69272#10
Carlo Zancanaro (2):
gnu: services: Add insecure-sasl-mechanisms to prosody configuration.
gnu: tests: Fix prosody system test.
doc/guix.texi | 12 +++++++++---
gnu/services/messaging.scm | 6 ++++++
gnu/tests/messaging.scm | 2 +-
3 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
base-commit: 2a8018e42c0d9b81de56cf322043c797e443c267
--
2.41.0
[Message part 3 (message/rfc822, inline)]
Am Dienstag, dem 12.03.2024 um 12:01 +1100 schrieb Carlo Zancanaro:
> On Mon, Mar 11 2024, Liliana Marie Prikler wrote:
> > Nice catch. Would you also like to submit tests for the modules in
> > 69272?
>
> I'm not sure how to test them. I had a look at the Freetalk API, but
> it doesn't seem like it supports any of the XMPP features that those
> extra modules add. We'd need to use a different client (or send raw
> XML stanzas) to poke prosody in the right ways.
>
> I'm not prepared to do that amount of exploratory work right now.
Fair enough, I pushed what you already have.
Cheers
This bug report was last modified 1 year and 143 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.