GNU bug report logs -
#69677
[PATCH gnome-team 0/1] Fix opam on gnome-team
Previous Next
Full log
View this message in rfc822 format
Le 9 mars 2024 21:35:43 GMT+01:00, Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler <at> gmail.com> a écrit :
>Hi Vivien,
>
>Am Samstag, dem 09.03.2024 um 20:39 +0100 schrieb Vivien Kraus:
>> My guess is that we have 2 ocaml libraries implementing Base64
>> (ocaml-base64 and ocaml-extlib, propagated from ocaml-dose3). Dune
>> sees that we have a powerful ocaml-base64 installed, so it lays out
>> the compatibility version 6 for us, but when it comes to actually
>> building the project, ocamlfind prioritizes the ocaml-extlib path by
>> adding it first, and it shadows our powerful ocaml-base64
>> implementation.
>>
>> With this new extlib actor in the plot, I could search better. It
>> seems like Opam is aware of the issue:
>>
>> https://github.com/ocaml/opam/issues/5694
>>
>> The solution seems to be for extlib to ship a minimal version. But
>> maybe this should primarily concern the ocaml team, not gnome-team,
>> as it looks to me like a recipe for breaking at least half of the
>> ocaml ecosystem.
Sounds like we could switch extlib to the dune build-system, possibly adding a #:package argument to make sure it doesn't build the compat version.
>How much of it is broken with gnome-team already (vs. broken on other
>branches)? It wouldn't be nice of us to say "here, we broke it, you
>fix it please". It also appears as though opam only has two dependants
>– are we not tracking this correctly or is a minimal version in use
>anyway?
opam is not used to build ocaml packages, so it's not a surprise to me it has so few dependents. Would be nice not to break it though, it's still a useful program by itself :)
>
>Cheers
>
>
>
This bug report was last modified 1 year and 98 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.