Subject: bug#69533: 30.0.50; Wrong byte compilation of a certain apply syntax

From: Michael Heerdegen <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 04 Mar 2024 09:17:20 +0100

"Basil L. Contovounesios" <[email-masked]> writes:

> FWIW, my guilty pleasure is using this calling convention with
> a non-literal form, e.g.:
>
>   (define-advice foo (:around (&rest args) my-foo)
>     (with-something (apply args)))

Hmm, I realize now that I have used this convention all the time, too,
without thinking about it (it just worked...), in the same
situation.  Instead of - what? - (apply #'funcall args)?  But I would
not say I like it.

Michael.