GNU bug report logs - #69528
30.0.50; [BUG] transient.el is not a member of package--builtin-versions

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: No Wayman <iarchivedmywholelife <at> gmail.com>

Date: Sun, 3 Mar 2024 17:26:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Found in version 30.0.50

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: Philip Kaludercic <philipk <at> posteo.net>, Stefan Monnier <monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca>, Stefan Kangas <stefankangas <at> gmail.com>, Andrea Corallo <acorallo <at> gnu.org>
Cc: iarchivedmywholelife <at> gmail.com, 69528 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, joseph <at> breatheoutbreathe.in
Subject: bug#69528: 30.0.50; [BUG] transient.el is not a member of package--builtin-versions
Date: Sat, 25 May 2024 13:49:01 +0300
> Cc: 69528 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, iarchivedmywholelife <at> gmail.com
> From: Philip Kaludercic <philipk <at> posteo.net>
> Date: Sat, 25 May 2024 08:04:24 +0000
> 
> Joseph Turner <joseph <at> breatheoutbreathe.in> writes:
> 
> > What about making `lm-version' handle the "package-version" header then
> > using `lm-version' in loaddefs-generate--parse-file?  See patches.
> 
> My main concern was if we want to have Package-Version always override
> Version, but if my patch modified loaddefs-gen, then I don't think there
> is much of a difference if we change lisp-mnt instead (in terms of the
> generality of the change).
> 
> So I am fine with the change, and think we can merge it.  Eli: Is master
> still fine for these kinds of changes?

I think so, yes.  But maybe I don't fully understand the effect of
this change?  Can you describe it?

I also added the other maintainers, in case they have opinions on
this.

Thanks.




This bug report was last modified 1 year and 12 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.