From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Mar 01 10:14:36 2024 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Mar 2024 15:14:36 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37275 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rg4ao-00079V-VI for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 01 Mar 2024 10:14:36 -0500 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:55322) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rg4ai-00079G-8M for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 01 Mar 2024 10:14:33 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rg4Xy-000350-D1 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Mar 2024 10:11:38 -0500 Received: from mail-lf1-x136.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::136]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rg4Xw-00073W-Sh for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Mar 2024 10:11:38 -0500 Received: by mail-lf1-x136.google.com with SMTP id 2adb3069b0e04-513173e8191so2517926e87.1 for ; Fri, 01 Mar 2024 07:11:35 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1709305893; x=1709910693; darn=gnu.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:user-agent:message-id:date :subject:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=OA3SJi2tMz7HS3l9YMP+5Ky154MsZhxnQKaMnwpgSVQ=; b=RG76+m7Acktcw+5vK51NZEzdQ46HfX+fOZiuQRL/5QsAQt+aquQJHlgUIKbP4dwNmq gpiZpuXh5bjfwbBPz1xCVU7sIM56OXBa4mRLTKDeMu+f5UDQvcdvOe5HnYJo5PK8xONx eOe7B2A2a8JhplT3zwlOFB2xirKepm8+KGa8x6PAY926p8gHIru8LxOYEkbeFz8naUZy 0qxJ0sabGfpa0iSpt4Nv/XJ8Zz9jphn22KwBJQFIIdL9eKCQ5vjIa0JNFu9O2Qf1WMF+ OjYg/lXP9+P75wKRyNseIAejUu533K0BMStzfai498jNljkf1P4G1YOtFhoO1RQKNLbd 0L1g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1709305893; x=1709910693; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:user-agent:message-id:date :subject:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=OA3SJi2tMz7HS3l9YMP+5Ky154MsZhxnQKaMnwpgSVQ=; b=Urz/IVzGYQEbhXXVXd3RsPixJp95Su/nk3Qv2B9701c/qbME+0R7srsP2z22C/lOqH QlLYRtJ2haeQ3dUM0+EcMhkXVhhavzju8YxRAkfabF/HusfuExlF8Lk8RgeLr6fMj3CE k8aP6aJMgT0EJ2RPxCoJX4wkOe/U4cwzoxhY8iqwz8vjNkaF4O45Uthvks8B3wgLO9Pl ZS6tP+qJEDP2nHivVEP4/IhYNaHYehU7cBL2rdXiC/k2QGQqZPhMbDW0KMo9ZABPPloJ g/yJYlOFhcw+bo9qxVylRrB6X1I+kZn45qxp2hsjVh1nGx53LYldBZql9tOn9rxUWl65 8n+w== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwKCw8rffCPNHL95QlznG9pLo70Zdq+6LovFUIgQwf4OHmyHMqg LI5+HZMwthrRfZKaRI3FDTsWFTfh0xwrEo8skOTiI1xbAe55ja6w/tpcIMss X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGcUoPwYUFd/l0OtUhwQxHPfADEIrleznYT7BMmZVl0TjqRcuXwCkxbpOs1V1WqJJ4kjWMwCg== X-Received: by 2002:ac2:5495:0:b0:513:2b9e:1d92 with SMTP id t21-20020ac25495000000b005132b9e1d92mr1516636lfk.41.1709305893410; Fri, 01 Mar 2024 07:11:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from mini (82.131.75.21.cable.starman.ee. [82.131.75.21]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c41-20020a05651223a900b00513256fb6fasm631552lfv.187.2024.03.01.07.11.32 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 01 Mar 2024 07:11:32 -0800 (PST) From: =?utf-8?Q?Andr=C3=A9_A=2E_Gomes?= To: bug-guix@gnu.org Subject: Regression regarding guix shell and its "pure" flag? Date: Fri, 01 Mar 2024 17:11:32 +0200 Message-ID: <87ttlqvvff.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::136; envelope-from=andremegafone@gmail.com; helo=mail-lf1-x136.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) Hi Guix, Take a package that you have installed in the default profile, say "which". Then notice that when issuing "guix shell --pure" followed by "which which" replies that the command can't be found. On the other hand, when starting the environment via "guix shell", the command can be found. If my memory isn't tricking me, the "pure" flag used to behave differently. It simply started the shell with a clean env, but it still exposed the packages from the default profile. Am I missing something or is this a regression? Thanks. --=20 Andr=C3=A9 A. Gomes "You cannot even find the ruins..." From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Mar 03 11:46:57 2024 Received: (at 69487) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Mar 2024 16:46:57 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41044 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rgozJ-000354-8G for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 03 Mar 2024 11:46:57 -0500 Received: from jpoiret.xyz ([206.189.101.64]:46052) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rgozH-00034x-R1 for 69487@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 03 Mar 2024 11:46:56 -0500 Received: from authenticated-user (jpoiret.xyz [206.189.101.64]) by jpoiret.xyz (Postfix) with ESMTPA id A3AFE185448; Sun, 3 Mar 2024 16:46:25 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=jpoiret.xyz; s=dkim; t=1709484385; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=Vk4bXWWN25OAGyNvv0gU6PRC9QlmKss02I8w0hdzJ8U=; b=BGnhW0KmkkXWIlDsEZ4PpZ1b9xnZecVt7gsECuQLuHahV7+fIAhYKb6fGwRqxEwNnVRY0M 9wz1lphVFTOF8RV/0mcJhx91BYDrhZvrPtg2m9Ti/FJhO6C82jmJ76n1R/h96JxicacrDO spuBnO1SVqqqUxTwE2GYP6c2Dp7FwhoN++Jepl0TlCYR4CdWbenLyUOgnE2qkNBwUnSr9g jBbUINeowISmBgfaF6ieSQ7n5YS11xJdDNwO8n8niqmhQlaW74TQmvB+xYbBfFMuJGsuOD L0lOVq3UGhzP/2yxZQ8BeW/LkseFb9uMxMX+pVpf2uJYIc5JzkmVS4ES2WAGHQ== From: Josselin Poiret To: =?utf-8?Q?Andr=C3=A9_A=2E_Gomes?= , 69487@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#69487: Regression regarding guix shell and its "pure" flag? In-Reply-To: <87ttlqvvff.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87ttlqvvff.fsf@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 03 Mar 2024 17:46:23 +0100 Message-ID: <87edcrmffk.fsf@jpoiret.xyz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Spamd-Bar: - Authentication-Results: jpoiret.xyz; auth=pass smtp.auth=jpoiret@jpoiret.xyz smtp.mailfrom=dev@jpoiret.xyz X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 69487 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Andr=C3=A9 Andr=C3=A9 A. Gomes writes: > Hi Guix, > > Take a package that you have installed in the default profile, say > "which". Then notice that when issuing "guix shell --pure" followed by > "which which" replies that the command can't be found. On the other > hand, when starting the environment via "guix shell", the command can be > found. > > If my memory isn't tricking me, the "pure" flag used to behave > differently. It simply started the shell with a clean env, but it still > exposed the packages from the default profile. Am I missing something > or is this a regression? No, this is `--pure` working as expected, the other behavior you describe would be considered a bug. Maybe you used to have the default profile loaded through .bashrc, even though this is discouraged exactly for that reason? Best, =2D-=20 Josselin Poiret --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQHEBAEBCAAuFiEEOSSM2EHGPMM23K8vUF5AuRYXGooFAmXkqV8QHGRldkBqcG9p cmV0Lnh5egAKCRBQXkC5Fhcaiv7AC/sGMRVeFbM3JP/ATd51CCibVMDSe09Py83I SktHhCasFPGKqnaC8t98I8KjiCXD99g7GU3whRIbz/mC1gWJEgodTQak/zsI3sKO Z8KoSuffbmcrttBYwA2D2oHJlUdaXUjI6/UcsNVJftV3io/0Gx6KJ17Ma04KSJ1F gBw50Tu9enQP5st4cgAMTyoCvGYzwegVZf9z9QSrreflDSDG9m0EfpMkVKmQ0FMY eO8XGxWj40mValZQIirAcdN98BPIYi4f4W8LMF+qT1H9r8DPqzGXjqQuiX+fGEMF CjAUI+k/oUTxUozqq9GN43WWfFHDIY5r4Z7ozdbzFMPi2oW0c64VqDbuGcrg4jo7 znggX0CaV5gzDdzdNbM6NA42vxvxU31ByjovBMCqO7jmBGXLLuHaOvzmaxqfY3x2 Rn7kiG3+RtlnUjPjNyVqFPm2FIshhihuTi7BZ7v6bXXslK/JP3BdIhVtWLRntxma s0Zkozb2IbXnVVcksbG/bU5Qu9U0JhA= =7+9J -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Jun 20 05:45:48 2024 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Jun 2024 09:45:48 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50590 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1sKEMW-000490-4J for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 20 Jun 2024 05:45:48 -0400 Received: from mail-lf1-f52.google.com ([209.85.167.52]:61933) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1sKEMU-00048n-QV for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 20 Jun 2024 05:45:47 -0400 Received: by mail-lf1-f52.google.com with SMTP id 2adb3069b0e04-52bc335e49aso701618e87.3 for ; Thu, 20 Jun 2024 02:45:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1718876677; x=1719481477; darn=debbugs.gnu.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:from:to:message-id :date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=jzMien6VSf+xTiKgXxs05JsFrKx3vTDI/k2r2em9VI8=; b=HVDor4qj3osF6nInHRrQ01A23IWdl0IiYJroEGiWCGFpQDM4wqUonBw+FgCNs8eNoZ da+dfOF6emyjAuXLt+Ha16TS3eZquV4D6rj+YIOqVegL+HnWIAZCRbf7Q8xDwtVHhK7V dQAGNnKmmjdD8uz6M2RMHNP9IXXQRV3cB5okrgisSHB8SGCNCoeaYpbxMgESaOJwgJW/ lkmZS9MSHk6mdN1qgD/Jv9E+Rq83pe94LSKO6g1T0n5n/Mkzo/xztZo9v0y46wrf5p7G 43Ef9x9Hjhx++NZVAc9BlBnrHLutVbYHiX3f09E05Uqt+vWKAOfnfOj9pBDR3kUX1YMz l+hQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1718876677; x=1719481477; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:from:to:message-id :date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=jzMien6VSf+xTiKgXxs05JsFrKx3vTDI/k2r2em9VI8=; b=LVhiRpdb8lZVAHsCwl6z4DbKhZA/jzU1bmevfd1vxNeYirF0ZyZR0yN8lKpPeQK/e5 LhIiD3iBuPGi2IA5xZ37TxrsbMRWigwCO6orMAXS51hkYYNiz3mC52m7qQ6jVOiAdugS F0Kidu+sXyRgxgdvfUCOtVExaelkf5NL31GiEhtJKNurvN0zJzs6VH5LzwmetR8owp9K SeTtV+Za5d6RZ/J39w0LEptVjQLCNxk689Fh7SPqhSnC0jDncO5jzuij9CVPMEWghn0O djKMcWkejx+oiW38lFL3hXLX8aIctkm8+0vyCN59IHNTYVF82QzKtzGIGIlYnEN7ON50 1SuQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxudW5DuXCSnMoJlOtQXzNcj5Z2ZQcBUeqh79ZmcH/qouiGoL8O XBSBnoEZ2XjtUnbXmR7CnJEJfIDmy9X54szrC51uVyffHIKEwESr8V1Dwg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHGV4GzRM3g7Pf25Srjnas8twNLjB9pIG8VhL2iGs+QHvg7buYsbK4RHq5uipW0mRtwIZutfg== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:685:b0:52c:9808:ddc3 with SMTP id 2adb3069b0e04-52ccaa5dc28mr3610008e87.15.1718876676689; Thu, 20 Jun 2024 02:44:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mini (82.131.116.197.cable.starman.ee. [82.131.116.197]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 2adb3069b0e04-52ca2825879sm1981735e87.57.2024.06.20.02.44.36 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 20 Jun 2024 02:44:36 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2024 12:44:36 +0300 Message-Id: <87cyoc6j97.fsf@gmail.com> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: =?utf-8?Q?Andr=C3=A9_A=2E_Gomes?= Subject: control message for bug #69487 MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Score: 2.7 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: close 69487 quit Content analysis details: (2.7 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (andremegafone[at]gmail.com) -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [209.85.167.52 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 RBL: Average reputation (+2) [209.85.167.52 listed in wl.mailspike.net] 2.7 MALFORMED_FREEMAIL Bad headers on message from free email service -0.0 T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE No description available. X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 1.7 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: close 69487 quit Content analysis details: (1.7 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [209.85.167.52 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 RBL: Average reputation (+2) [209.85.167.52 listed in wl.mailspike.net] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (andremegafone[at]gmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record 2.7 MALFORMED_FREEMAIL Bad headers on message from free email service -0.0 T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE No description available. -1.0 MAILING_LIST_MULTI Multiple indicators imply a widely-seen list manager close 69487 quit From unknown Sat Aug 16 21:20:19 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2024 11:24:11 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator