GNU bug report logs - #69480
Emacs Lisp needs, for its great 'native-compile', 'declare' and 'the' for fixnums and arrays.

Previous Next

Full log

Message #65 received at 69480 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Stephen Berman <stephen.berman <at> gmx.net>
To: Andrea Corallo <acorallo <at> gnu.org>
Cc: robertstephenboyer <at> gmail.com, Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>,
 69480 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#69480: Emacs Lisp needs, for its great 'native-compile',
 'declare' and 'the' for fixnums and arrays.
Date: Fri, 01 Mar 2024 15:35:09 +0100

On Fri, 01 Mar 2024 09:07:54 -0500 Andrea Corallo <acorallo <at> gnu.org> wrote:

> Stephen Berman <stephen.berman <at> gmx.net> writes:
>
>> On Fri, 01 Mar 2024 15:41:24 +0200 Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> wrote:
>>
[...]
>>> My suggestion was to compare profiles in the byte-compiled and
>>> native-compiled cases.
>>>
>>> Btw, are you running both cases in the same session?  If so, don't:
>>> restart Emacs and run the other case instead.
>>
>> Ok, I've now done that.  Here's the report for the run with native
>> compilation:
>>
>>        12599  95% - command-execute
>>        12487  95%  - funcall-interactively
>>        12486  95%   - eval-expression
>>        12485  95%    - #<compiled -0x5db3e1955cb81d1>
>>        12485  95%     - #<compiled -0x8a5cf032951a0fe>
>>        12480  95%      - eval
>>        12480  95%       - progn
>>        12367  94%        - benchmark-call
>>        12367  94%         - #<lambda 0x8c97b8cb7bd82>
>>        12367  94%            build-sieve
>>          113   0%        - emacs-lisp-native-compile-and-load
>>          113   0%         - emacs-lisp-native-compile
>>          113   0%          - native-compile
>
> IIUC this is profiling the native compilation itself.
>
> BTW I'd suggest the profile is done with perf (and running batch).

I don't have perf installed, but I build the kernel from source, so I
guess I could build and install perf, but...

> Given you see on your machine similar times for native and byte compiled
> the expected outcome should be tha tthe time is spent in some C routine
> of our core.

If you consider ~12.7 (native-compiled) and ~9.6 (byte-compiled),
similar for this benchmark, and since Eli said it's expected that
native-compiled elisp can be slower than byte-compiled elisp for some
programs, then I guess I can just accept that for this case, the
difference between my timings is within a reasonable margin of error and
not due to some problem with my libgccjit (which I also built and
installed myself).

Steve Berman

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.