GNU bug report logs - #69392
[PATCH gnome-team 0/2] Add entries for important gnome-team changes

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: "pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)" <pelzflorian <at> pelzflorian.de>
To: Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 69392 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, rg <at> raghavgururajan.name, Vivien Kraus <vivien <at> planete-kraus.eu>, maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com
Subject: [bug#69392] [PATCH v3 3/3] news: Add entry for changes in GNOME 44 and its desktop service.
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2024 09:21:36 +0100

Hi all.  Good to see so many translations, and so much development for
Guix!

@Vivien:
> Suggested fr: "Le service @code{gnome-desktop-service-type} sépare
> maintenant les paquets @code{shell}, @code{utilities} et @code{extra-

Perhaps “les champs” as in English, instead of “les paquets”.

@Liliana:
Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler <at> gmail.com> writes:
> * etc/teams.scm: Add entry.

teams?

> +unter andrem zwischen den Feldern shell, utilities, und extra-packages und
> +bringt so etwas mehr Struktur in die Konfiguration.

In German, there shouldn’t be an Oxford comma, instead: utilities und
extra-packages (without comma).

Other than that, even though I would have written “unter anderem”, I do
approve of the “unter andrem”.  Wiktionary says it’s OK. :)

> +Mit dem Update zu GNOME 44 wurden einige Erweiterungen als obsolet deklariert
> +und andere entfernt.  Falls ein Paket, dessen Name mit
> +@code{gnome-shell-extension-} beginnt zu einem Fehler während Ihrer

Paariges Komma fehlt: “beginnt, zu einem Fehler”

> +Update-Routine führt, entfernen Sie es von ihrem Profil.")))

von Ihrem Profil

Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler <at> gmail.com> writes:
>> Since it is Texinfo, maybe you could use @dots{} instead of “...”.
> Not sure if that works recursively.
>> été dépréciées et d’autres supprimées. Si un paquet nommé
>> @code{gnome-shell-extension-@dots{}} émet une erreur quand vous
>> effectuez la mise à jour, vous devriez l’enlever de votre profil."
> Have you checked how that renders?

There is precedent in another news entry on Childhurds:

When you do this, @command{guix system} generates
a @file{/etc/guix/machines.scm} file by concatenating the @code{(build-machine
@dots{})} expressions you specified.

Regards,
Florian

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.